Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Hello Idris,
I didn't see any reply to this e-mail you sent two weeks ago, so I
wanted to give it a try:
In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
U004C U0303 (l ̃)
is always treated as l with tilde above, taking into
I only wanted to add a note:
XeTeX always converts, say, c + combining caron into a ccaron whenever
one exists in the font (and does that on a really low-level). If
ccaron doesn't exist (or if there's no such comination in unicode), it
simply requests both glyphs from the font (and only modern
Thanks for the reminder. We have been thinking about creating an
lpeg variant that operates on tokens and/or nodes instead of
simple data strings, but that will take quite a bit of work.
That sure would be nice.
It would be possible to simplify the loop logic by storing 'v' in
a local
Hi Hans,
I have always found the space at the beginning of each item in
\startitemize[text] to be too large. Currently, this is hard coded to be
\emwidth plus \intertwordstretch minus \interwordshrink (line 1132 of
core-itm.tex with the comment new per 2006/10/20). I always end of
copying the
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
\catcode`\_ = 11
or ...
\nonknuthmode
(there's also \donkunthmode -)
-
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Hello Idris,
I didn't see any reply to this e-mail you sent two weeks ago, so I
wanted to give it a try:
In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
U004C U0303 (l ̃)
is always treated as l with tilde above, taking into
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
:) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
\catcode`\_ = 11
or ...
\nonknuthmode
(there's also \donkunthmode -)
Hey, somehow never noticed
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:27 -0700, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
U004C U0303 (l ̃)
is always treated as l with tilde above, taking into account italics
and
without using \~l (which does not work in, eg, footnote)?
if i know the precise specs i can build it into the utf collapser
I can work that out for you, but we need to think about how to treat
all this consistently, in particular with respect to the questions Mojca
raised:
· Equivalent sequences need to be treated the same way (c + combining
XeTeX always converts, say, c + combining caron into a ccaron whenever
one exists in the font
Does it really? I had understood from the last discussion on the
XeTeX list that it did not, with the example of capital alpha +
combining breathing which was not set correctly. But maybe it's
10 matches
Mail list logo
