Hans van der Meer wrote:
This used to define command \fx in a typescript:
\definefontstyle [fax] [fx]
\definestyle [fax] [\fx] []
However MKIV produces an undefined control sequence \fx.
What happened?
actual definition of those commands is delayed so in order to test what
is wrong a more
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Working on typescripts for YY's LucidaBright (which are type1 fonts)
for MKIV (hoping to maintain compatibilty with MKII), the following code
produces all math in bold, even the first x+y.
\usetypescript[luc]\setupbodyfont[luci]\starttext $x+y$ -- $\bfmath
x+y$
Let me be more specific.
For handwriting I can do \setupbodyfont[luci,10pt,hw] and get
everything in handwriting, or {\hw ...} for local handwriting. The
typescript for handwriting is:
\starttypescript [handwriting] [lucibr] [name]
\definebodyfont [default] [hw]
Hans van der Meer wrote:
Let me be more specific.
For handwriting I can do \setupbodyfont[luci,10pt,hw] and get everything
in handwriting, or {\hw ...} for local handwriting. The typescript for
handwriting is:
\starttypescript [handwriting] [lucibr] [name]
\definebodyfont [default]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:41 AM, luigi scarsoluigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
$context --version
MTXrun | main context file:
/opt/luatex/minimals/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex
MTXrun | current version: 2009.08.13 13:13
$ luatex --version
This is LuaTeX, Version
B. Vogel wrote:
Hi all,
I have an enumeration: example that will reset by section.
Using my own header: Mysection the enumeration is not reset by section.
The second instance shows the failure.
However, after a \section it suddenly works.
And there is a problem with the sectioncounter
I examined the typescript given and started to apply it. I get however
a strange error in that a font is not found.
I replaced my line:
\definefontsynonym [LucidaCalligraphy-Italic] [file:lbc.tfm]
with the given:
\definefontsynonym [LucidaCalligraphy-Italic]
Yes, \hw does what it is supposed to do. {\hw ...} typesets in the
handwriting font. {\cg ...} also works.
On 19 aug 2009, at 11:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 19 aug 2009, at 09:08, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
This used to define command \fx in a typescript:
\definefontstyle
FIXED with
$ context --version
MTXrun | current version: 2009.08.13 13:13
$ luatex --version
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.43.0-2009081911
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:41 AM, luigi scarsoluigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
$context --version
MTXrun | main context file:
Thank you, but one small concern. If I omit second argument altoghether,
that is
\author{Bla-bla}
is it possible to have skip? (Now skip doesn't work until I provide empty
second parenthesizes)
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
\author{Bla-bla}{}
\define[2]\author{{\itx (#1)}{\hfill\tx
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Hans Hagen wrote:
B. Vogel wrote:
Hi all,
I have an enumeration: example that will reset by section.
Using my own header: Mysection the enumeration is not reset by section.
The second instance shows the failure.
However, after a \section it suddenly
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and \includegraphics
in LaTeX, i.e. no more need to
Hi Peter,
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and
Am 19.08.2009 um 13:00 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Thank you, but one small concern. If I omit second argument
altoghether, that is
\author{Bla-bla}
is it possible to have skip? (Now skip doesn't work until I provide
empty second parenthesizes)
When you define a command with two
Am 19.08.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Peter Münster:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there
are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of
beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox
Hi,
I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running
\everymath = {\displaystyle}
\starttext
${a\over b}$
\stoptext
results in
! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition.
l.4 ${a\over b
}$
Plain format under luatex has no problem here.
If I
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi Peter,
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello Hans,
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like \parbox and
Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Since there is no more need, to keep compatibility with MKII (there are
already a lot of differences), I suggest - for the benefit of beginners -
to change at least 2 things:
- let \framed or \externalfigure behave like
Eythan Weg wrote:
Hi,
I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running
\everymath = {\displaystyle}
\starttext
${a\over b}$
\stoptext
results in
! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition.
l.4 ${a\over b
}$
Plain format under luatex has
Am 19.08.2009 um 16:47 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Eythan Weg wrote:
Hi,
I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running\everymath =
{\displaystyle}
\starttext
${a\over b}$
\stoptext
results in ! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition.
l.4 ${a\over b
}$
Hello,
a half-philosophical question (not too relevant).
I was wondering: what color exactly is the screen
(\framed[background=screen]{...})? Or is it a special effect maybe?
I know that using it has long been deprecated, but I used it in many
older documents as it was easiest to remember
Am 19.08.2009 um 17:47 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Hello,
a half-philosophical question (not too relevant).
I was wondering: what color exactly is the screen
(\framed[background=screen]{...})? Or is it a special effect maybe?
screen are gray scales, e.g. gray is defined as
Xan wrote:
/ Hi,
//
// Is there any way for setupitemize only for \startitemize[a]?
// I want do something like:
//
// \setupitemize[a][left=(,right=),stopper=]
/
\defineitemgroup[myitemize] ...
Uf!, too much complicated.
I wonder if in the future we could set up itemize lists of some
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 17:59, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 19.08.2009 um 17:47 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Hello,
a half-philosophical question (not too relevant).
I was wondering: what color exactly is the screen
(\framed[background=screen]{...})? Or is it a special effect maybe?
screen
Am 16.08.2009 um 14:51 schrieb Xan:
Hi,
With this code:
\placefigure
[here]
[fig:graf-Cayley-Z2xZ3]
{An example of \type{\startcombination...}.}
{\startcombination[1*2]
{\startcombination[2*1]
{\externalfigure[lb1]} {a1}
{\externalfigure[lb2]} {a2}
\stopcombination} {a}
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you. I will ask further questions on the conference ;)
Vyatcheslav
When you define a command with two arguments you*need* two arguments,
context has a few
commands where you can make the second one optional but this requires
more code.
Wolfgang
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Vyatcheslav
Yatskovskyyatskov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Thank you. I will ask further questions on the conference ;)
So, in the end we will see Wolfgang at the conference ?
So, in the end we will see Wolfgang at the conference ?
Sorry, I was sure that Wolfgang will come. [blush]
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 16.08.2009 um 14:51 schrieb Xan:
Hi,
With this code:
\placefigure
[here]
[fig:graf-Cayley-Z2xZ3]
{An example of \type{\startcombination...}.}
{\startcombination[1*2]
{\startcombination[2*1]
{\externalfigure[lb1]} {a1}
30 matches
Mail list logo
