On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
function track.simple(arg)
Try this:
print(TRACK:, arg)
\def\foottrack#1{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple(#1)}}}
With interaction enabled, the argument to \footnote{} gets evaluated twice.
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information:
On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of
interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof
Sorry, I had forgotten to answer your main-question:
\def\foottrack#1{\expanded{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple(#1)
and, if
Dear Hans,
I wrote to you
thank you for your latest effort to put u3d support in a working state, but
more thanks for more effort, but
May be a more robust way is to read first 3 bytes of the model file, since
U3D or PRC signature is always there - that can be done instead of
relying on
Hi Peter, hi all!
On 2010-04-17 08:52:05, Peter Münster wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of
interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof
Sorry, I had forgotten to answer your main-question:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:37:02 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com scribit:
[...]
the sign | (vertical bar) seems to be a special char (context/mkiv)
it is only compiled if present in pairs |text |
the message: File ended while use of \next
\type{|} works
To
Hello,
thanks to contributors of this list I was able to use ppchtex with
LaTeX when I encountered a \writestatus: Undefined control sequence
problem:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/044672.html
Everything went well (though I have a little use of ppchtex) but, as I
tried it some
On 17-4-2010 8:27, Peter Münster wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
function track.simple(arg)
Try this:
print(TRACK:, arg)
\def\foottrack#1{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple(#1)}}}
With interaction enabled, the argument to \footnote{} gets evaluated twice.
eventually
On 17-4-2010 9:20, Philipp Gesang wrote:
Hi Peter, hi all!
On 2010-04-1708:52:05, Peter Münster wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16 2010, Philipp Gesang wrote:
I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of
interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof
Sorry, I had forgotten to
Hi again,
footnotes keep me busy:
···8··
\def\sc{\setfontfeature{smallcaps}}
\definefontfeature [default][default]
[mode=node,onum=yes,liga=yes]
\definefontfeature [smallcaps][default]
Hello,
could anyone describe me, how to deal with orphans and widows in Context?
Now I use
\clubpenalty=8000
\widowpenalty=8000
is there any context way how to do that?
greetings
Jan
--
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
Am 17.04.10 10:51, schrieb R. Bastian:
what is the sense of |text | ?
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Composed_words
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Am 17.04.10 11:35, schrieb Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini:
Hallo,
I have to typeset a division and have two diverent solutions but they
both have problems.
\setuplines[style=type]
\startlines
110011:11=10001
11
...
~0
\stoplines
\stoptext
\setuplines[style=type,space=on]
\startlines
Taco:
Try
\setuppublications[alternative=num]
Thank you, but using that I get the same result:
\cite[myKey] prints out empty brackets [], not [1].
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
\define[1]\divisionrule
{\dontleavehmode\blap
{\vskip-\strutht
\blackrule[width=\the\dimexpr.5em*#1\relax,height=2\linewidth]}%
\vskip-\lineheight}
Ahh! Yes, this helps a lot.
Thank you very much!
Wolfgang
___
Michael Saunders odradek5 at gmail.com writes:
Taco:
Try
\setuppublications[alternative=num]
Thank you, but using that I get the same result:
Mk II gets the desired result; Mk IV does not.
Example:
\usemodule[bib]
\setuppublications[alternative=num,refcommand=num]
Michael Green:
Mk II gets the desired result; Mk IV does not.
Example:
\usemodule[bib]
\setuppublications[alternative=num,refcommand=num]
...
That's it then. I'm using Mk IV. Is there a proper way to use it?
By the way, the developers should know something: in English, a
criterium is a
16 matches
Mail list logo
