Re: [NTG-context] new (lmtx) beta

2019-10-11 Thread Jeong Dal
Dear Hans, >> Though it calculates function using “x^2 + y^2”, it is better to write the >> name of it as the output of $x^2 + y^2$. >> Is it possible to write it as in mathematical form? > >functionstyle = "math”, > It works nicely. >> Is there any reason to use two different

Re: [NTG-context] Difference in right justification in LMTX

2019-10-11 Thread Joseph Canedo
Hi Hans, I still get the issue with right justification with LMTX for some reason. I see a small whitespace between the last 't' in the line with LMTX which I don't see with Mkiv. I also notice that position of the 't' box computed from all previous boxes/characters in the line is different from

Re: [NTG-context] Difference in right justification in LMTX

2019-10-11 Thread Joseph Canedo
Le ven. 12 avr. 2019 à 09:39, Joseph Canedo a écrit : > Yes. I’ve deleted my lmtx installation directory and fetched the install > .zip from Pragma ADE web site and ran install.bat, to double check. > > > > *De : *Hans Hagen > *Envoyé le :*jeudi 11 avril 2019 22:59 > *À : *Joseph Canedo ;

Re: [NTG-context] List of Symbols/Abbreviations/Glosses with more then two entries

2019-10-11 Thread Thomas Welter
Since there has not been a response (and since I am still unhappy with the limitations of \definesynonyms) I came up with my own solution which is included in this mail. The code provides a fully automated handling of symbols. I think this might be useful for a lot of people in engineering,

Re: [NTG-context] (bug?) no destinations for footnote links in LMTX

2019-10-11 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 10/10/19 5:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 10/9/2019 4:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> I have the following sample: >> >> \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=standard] >> \starttext >> a\footnote{b} >> \stoptext >> >> I’m afraid that LMTX doesn’t generate a

Re: [NTG-context] new (lmtx) beta

2019-10-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/11/2019 4:09 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: Dear Hans, I read the manual of luametafun and do some examples. Thanks for many new features. It is  really great. I’d like to ask two things. 1. On  page 26,27, in the manual, http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/luametafun.pdf a function

[NTG-context] new beta

2019-10-11 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I uploaded a new beta. Some might have noticed that stepwise some font support has been redone. We're talking of lmtx only here. For instance low level handling of color fonts as used for emoji but there are also other (often incomplete) fonts out there (overlay, png, svg) has become (on

Re: [NTG-context] new (lmtx) beta

2019-10-11 Thread Jeong Dal
Dear Hans, I read the manual of luametafun and do some examples. Thanks for many new features. It is really great. I’d like to ask two things. 1. On page 26,27, in the manual, > > http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/luametafun.pdf >

Re: [NTG-context] Documentation of change / Evolving documents

2019-10-11 Thread Axel Kielhorn
Hello! I have added my document about evolving documents to the Wiki at: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Changes_Evolution and included it into the list of sample documents. Share and enjoy Axel ___ If your