Re: [NTG-context] 14th ConTeXt Meeting (2020), Sibřina, Czech Republic

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 1/31/2020 6:06 PM, Jano Kula wrote: Dear all, as you may have noticed: the 14th ConTeXt Meeting will be held in Sibřina, Czech Republic on *September 6–12 (Sun–Sat), 2020* Meeting people you know from the list is always a great pleasure and fun as are discussed topics on LuaTeX,

Re: [NTG-context] Harfbuzz

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/1/2020 2:48 PM, Denis Maier wrote: Hi, I have just read that TeX Live 2020 will use the LuaHBTeX engine for LuaLaTeX. What is the status of HarfBuzz with ConTeXt? I've searched the wiki, but couldn't find anything. Do you need something specific? Hans

Re: [NTG-context] [HOWTO] spanning xtable cells

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/2/2020 4:59 PM, Floris van Manen wrote: Can someone (please) help me out to fix the incorrect/unintended stacking of cells within the xtable? i'll look into it. - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 11:22:26AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > we are waiting for you to predict the future, when do you think nofemoji > will pass nofnonemoji (we could draw a curve of how much got added each > version of unicode) .. visualizing your argument could help It’s never going to

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:47:46AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > I’m aware, just joking around. It was hard to tell. > But we get new emojis all the time but AFAIK there are still > characters/glyphs or whole scripting systems missing. You do realise that it’s not the same people

Re: [NTG-context] Official file ending?

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/5/2020 11:00 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am 2020-02-05 um 10:24 schrieb Hans Hagen : On 2/4/2020 8:27 PM, kaddour kardio wrote: Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it is more legitimate to got the "dot tex" than latex :) I always wonder where such info comes from.

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/5/2020 10:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Oh yes, I didn’t think of that. You don’t need a ligature for software cheats, though, they’re default. But if combustion engines get prohibited, does that affect the emojis? they will be kept (like ancient scripts are supported) actually

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/5/2020 10:37 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. Just for the record: it is not true at all that

Re: [NTG-context] How to approach a ConTeXt language server?

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/4/2020 4:45 PM, Philipp A. wrote: Language servers are the new big deal in editor and IDE development: https://langserver.org/ It would be cool to have a ConTeXt one for autocompletion (for ConTeXt: command names, \cite IDs, labels, named parameters, …), go-to-definition, hover

Re: [NTG-context] Official file ending?

2020-02-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:24 schrieb Hans Hagen : > > On 2/4/2020 8:27 PM, kaddour kardio wrote: >> Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it is more legitimate to >> got the "dot tex" than latex :) > I always wonder where such info comes from. Plain tex is a 45K file that is >

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:38 AM Arthur Reutenauer < arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > Just for the record: it is not true at all that Unicode is “mostly > emojis” nowadays. Even today, the vast majority of characters added > each year is 90% non-emoji. I make this point at every

Re: [NTG-context] How to approach a ConTeXt language server?

2020-02-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:42 schrieb Philipp A. : > > Thank you, that’s great information! > > What’s the “export XML”? Should I google that for you? https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Export Grüßlinge, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:37 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer > : > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest >> version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. > > Just for the record: it is not

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 2020-02-05 um 10:29 schrieb Hans Hagen : > > On 2/5/2020 9:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest >> version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. >> Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are

Re: [NTG-context] How to approach a ConTeXt language server?

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp A.
Thank you, that’s great information! What’s the “export XML”? Am Di., 4. Feb. 2020 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm < te...@fiee.net>: > > > Am 2020-02-04 um 16:45 schrieb Philipp A. : > > > > Language servers are the new big deal in editor and IDE development: > https://langserver.org/

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 09:45:09AM +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest > version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. Just for the record: it is not true at all that Unicode is “mostly emojis” nowadays. Even today,

Re: [NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/5/2020 9:45 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are also new animals, and most important: “my” ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] Official file ending?

2020-02-05 Thread Philipp A.
Ha, I was just writing about my confusion, thank you for clearing this up. So how about I add those four to Wikipedia and the ConTeXt wiki? Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:23 Uhr schrieb Hans Hagen : > On 2/4/2020 8:27 PM, kaddour kardio wrote: > > Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it

Re: [NTG-context] Official file ending?

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/4/2020 8:27 PM, kaddour kardio wrote: Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it is more legitimate to got the "dot tex" than latex :) I always wonder where such info comes from. Plain tex is a 45K file that is described in the tex book and serves as template for Don Knuths own

Re: [NTG-context] Official file ending?

2020-02-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/4/2020 8:27 PM, kaddour kardio wrote: Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it is more legitimate to got the "dot tex" than latex :) Le mar. 4 févr. 2020 à 17:57, Pablo Rodriguez > a écrit : On 2/3/20 3:28 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/3/2020 3:07

[NTG-context] Unicode 13 – save the \dodo!

2020-02-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Hi, I’m a bit late: Last week the Unicode consortium released the latest version of their nowadays mostly-emoji standard. Besides several entries for transgender representation, there are also new animals, and most important: “my” ConTeXt mascot, the Dodo! ;D see