> On 30 Nov 2021, at 19:34, Alexandre Christe via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
>
>
> What I've done is to play with mathalignment and \framed. Here is a MWE:
>
> \starttext
> \defineoverlay[midrule][{\blackrule[height=.02cm,width=5.5cm]}]
>
>
Hello list,
It seems that font scaling to a letter is not working consistently in LMTX.
This example:
\definefont[TitleA][Sans sa a]
\definefont[TitleAB][Sansbold sa a]
\starttext
{\ssa This is ssa \TitleA and this is TitleA}\par
{\ssbf This is ssbf \TitleAB and this is
Dear list,
[image: image.png]
What I've done is to play with mathalignment and \framed. Here is a MWE:
\starttext
\defineoverlay[midrule][{\blackrule[height=.02cm,width=5.5cm]}]
\framed[frame=off,background=midrule,boffset=.65cm]{\startformula
Hi,
(1) See previous mails on the list (those who requested it have to wikify):
- mixed bars (with limitations)
- horizontal registers (flushing)
(2) As a side effect of reshuffling some code (as well as being complete):
- \boxshift 0 = 10pt
- hbox shift -10pt{...}
These box shifts are what
On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
But the problem is that you have to create an “underbardot" that contains both the
bar and the dots, to fix the non-nesting problem. It is then quite hard to get that
definition to align properly with any enclosing “underbar” (I
On 11/30/2021 2:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context
wrote:
Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of
course...
I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but
Hi!
Apologies for spamming this list with my all the floaty stuff.
There's an issue with defining new floats in LMTX in combination
with bottom placement.
The following works in MkIV, but throws an error in LMTX:
I'm ignoring this; it doesn't match any \if.
mtx-context | fatal error:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:05:23 +0100
Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
> Maybe you could define your own float type for the cases without
> caption?
I've done that for other options, too, I guess no-caption-floats get
a dedicated float type as well now. It's more robust than relying on
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > Another question: what do you mean with a dy-shift version?
>
> Nested bars have a parameter ‘dy’ which controls the vertical shifts needed
> to make sure that they do not overlap. Text backgrounds do not have that
> option at
Ok, so I will see. But, if even you gave up, I should better hope that someone
else hears our desperate cries ;)
Denis
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Taco Hoekwater
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. November 2021 14:52
> An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
> Cc: Maier, Denis Christian (UB)
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 14:38, Denis Maier via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of
> course...
>
> I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but
> unfortunately I don't know metafun yet.
>
> If my
Am 30.11.21 um 14:19 schrieb Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context:
I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well.
YES, #metoo
As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside
\overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations
Thanks, Taco. Good to know. Although it's not what I wanted to hear, of
course...
I was thinking using mp to draw the combination could be solution, but
unfortunately I don't know metafun yet.
If my understanding of https://source.contextgarden.net/node-rul.mkiv is
correct, it should be
> On 30 Nov 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars.
>
> - A normal underbar
> - A dotted underbar
> - A combination of both
>
> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted
Hi!
In the following example “Lorem ipsum” sits on an otherwise empty
page in LMTX. Output is as expected with MkIV. Has the interface
changed or may it be a bug in LMTX?
\starttext
\null\godown [15.5cm]
\samplefile{knuth}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod
Am 30.11.21 um 13:38 schrieb Marco Patzer via ntg-context:
As far as I know there's no way to only turn off captions, so one
has to know the default placement value (which might be buried in an
environment file) and specify it again together with the “none”
option.
If you (or someone else)
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:06:00 +0100
Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
> Well, in {bottom,top,here} it’s the order that TeX should try.
“location“ sets the location of the caption as well as the position
of the entire float. If you want to influence one, you'll also have
to specify the
Am 30.11.21 um 12:16 schrieb Marco Patzer via ntg-context:
Hi!
Today I discovered that the parameter order in float location matters:
\starttext
\samplefile{knuth}
\startplacefigure [location={top,none}] %% works: float is at the top
\externalfigure
\stopplacefigure
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Hans Hagen
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. November 2021 14:26
> An: Maier, Denis Christian (UB) ; ntg-
> cont...@ntg.nl
> Betreff: Re: AW: [NTG-context] Title for tabulate
>
> On 11/28/2021 1:22 PM, denis.ma...@unibe.ch wrote:
> >
> >> -Ursprüngliche
Hi!
Today I discovered that the parameter order in float location matters:
\starttext
\samplefile{knuth}
\startplacefigure [location={top,none}] %% works: float is at the top
\externalfigure
\stopplacefigure
\startplacefigure [location={none,top}] %% top is ignored here
Hi,
for a current project I'll need different variants of underbars.
- A normal underbar
- A dotted underbar
- A combination of both
Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above
the normal bar.
This is not working
%%%
Hi,
I’d like to create a caption with the first line hanging/outdented compared to
the lines afterwards, like this:
> Figure 1. Here is the line of text
>that goes on to a second line. The
>first line is hanging.
I’ve posted this question here:
22 matches
Mail list logo
