On 04/08/2014 05:09 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
[...]
I’m speaking about the different results when you use “G” or
“Greeknumerals” as name for the conversion in \defineconversionset,
while the first works in bookmarks the second doesn’t work even though
there is no difference between both
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\definestructureconversionset[cs][0,Greeknumerals,greeknumerals][n]
\setupheads[sectionconversionset=cs]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\placebookmarks[chapter, section]
\starttext
\dorecurse{5}{\chapter{Chapter}
\section
Am 07.04.2014 um 20:45 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\definestructureconversionset[cs][0,Greeknumerals,greeknumerals][n]
\setupheads[sectionconversionset=cs]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\placebookmarks[chapter, section
On 04/07/2014 08:59 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.04.2014 um 20:45 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
[...]
I cannot get either Greeknumerals or greeknumerals working in PDF
bookmarks.
\defineconversionset[cs][n,G,g][n]
Many thanks for your help, Wolfgang.
Since Romannumerals and romannumerals
Am 07.04.2014 um 21:18 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
On 04/07/2014 08:59 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.04.2014 um 20:45 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
[...]
I cannot get either Greeknumerals or greeknumerals working in PDF
bookmarks.
\defineconversionset[cs][n,G,g][n]
Many
On 7 avr. 2014, at 21:25, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 07.04.2014 um 21:18 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
[…]
Since Romannumerals and romannumerals (or Characters and characters) are
required, I thought it would be consistent to use Greeknumerals
to the
case one would say a), b), c), d) etc.
Would Thomas Schmitz give us some insight?
In fact, I was wondering what “Greeknumerals” would translate to. The most
common system used in antiquity is the “Milesian” system: α=1, β=2 etc., but 6
is expressed by ς; ι=10; ρ=100, with two archaic
) are
required, I thought it would be consistent to use Greeknumerals and
greeknumerals. But I was obviously wrong.
This could be a bug because there shouldn’t be a difference between the two
conversion names.
Maybe not, since Roman numerals i, ii, iii, iv, etc correspond really to the
way Romans
Romannumerals and romannumerals (or Characters and characters) are
required, I thought it would be consistent to use Greeknumerals and
greeknumerals. But I was obviously wrong.
This could be a bug because there shouldn’t be a difference between the two
conversion names.
Maybe not, since
