On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 11:21 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page?
plain old tex
\vbox{%
\startitemize
\stopitemize%
}
?
--
luigi
Am 17.03.2012 um 10:21 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page?
plain old tex
\vbox{%
Hey list,
Is there any way to hint to ConTeXt that the contents of a \startitemize
\stopitemize pair should try to be all on the same page?
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 23:26 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey list,
I'd like an itemized list using the following format...
Article I ...
Article II ...
Article III ...
...and so on. I've tried defining the behaviour with...
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 23:26 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey list,
I'd like an itemized list using the following format...
Article I ...
Article II ...
Article III ...
...and so on. I've tried defining the
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thanks Aditya. A couple questions for you.
\defineitemgroup[article]
\setupitemgroup
[article]
[
left={Article },
stopper=,
symbol=R,
before=\blank,
after=\blank,
distance=0.5em,
]
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
\starttext
\startarticle
\item First article
\item Second article
\stoparticle
Again
Another thing I just noticed is that using \startarticle[start=20]
before an item block doesn't always begin counting at that. On some
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:10 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thanks Aditya. A couple questions for you.
\defineitemgroup[article]
\setupitemgroup
[article]
[
left={Article },
stopper=,
symbol=R,
before=\blank,
after=\blank,
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:44 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thats how itemgroup are configured. You cannot mix assignments (key=value)
with options.
I don't follow. What is the difference between this,
\setupitemgroup
[article]
[
left={Article },
stopper=,
symbol=R,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:44 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Thats how itemgroup are configured. You cannot mix assignments (key=value)
with options.
I don't follow. What is the difference between this,
\setupitemgroup
[article]
[
left={Article },
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 00:22 -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
ConTeXt checks if the argument of \setupitemgroup has an assignment
(key=value), then it calls a version of \setparameters; otherwise it calls
a version of \processcommalist. So, if you use assignments and options in
the same command,
Hey list,
I'd like an itemized list using the following format...
Article I ...
Article II ...
Article III ...
...and so on. I've tried defining the behaviour with...
\defineenumeration[article]
[location=top,
text=Article,
between=\blank,
before=\blank,
after=\blank]
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey list,
I'd like an itemized list using the following format...
Article I ...
Article II ...
Article III ...
...and so on. I've tried defining the behaviour with...
\defineenumeration[article]
[location=top,
text=Article,
between=\blank,
On 6-1-2012 00:25, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Wagner Macedo:
As I know, yes, this is the intended behavior. You should be thinking in a
WYSIWYG way, but TeX, as most languages (except Python, that I know) works
apart you write every code in one line or write
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:25, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
No, this is a bug because with the “text” keyword you can create a inline
item which doesn’t start a new paragraph.
Wolfgang
Thanks for the confirmation. I hope it will be fixed soon.
Vianney
Hello,
If I type
Blabla. \startitemize[a,text] \item one \item two \stopitemize Blabla.
I get a linebreak before and after the itemize. Is this the intended
behaviour? How can I get a fully inline enumeration?
Thanks,
Vianney
...@gmail.com
If I type
Blabla. \startitemize[a,text] \item one \item two \stopitemize Blabla.
I get a linebreak before and after the itemize. Is this the intended
behaviour? How can I get a fully inline enumeration
Am 06.01.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Wagner Macedo:
As I know, yes, this is the intended behavior. You should be thinking in a
WYSIWYG way, but TeX, as most languages (except Python, that I know) works
apart you write every code in one line or write pretty indented.
No, this is a bug because
Ah... sorry. I read the manual but I didn't remember this feature.
--
Wagner Macedo
On 5 January 2012 20:25, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
No, this is a bug because with the “text” keyword you can create a inline
item which doesn’t start a new paragraph.
Why does framedtext extends to the right in \itemize? Shouldn't the width be
reduced by the extend of the item-shift? Isn't that the idea behind the
fit-parameter.
It wouldn't be a problem to calculate a reduced width, but how can I access the
marginshift caused by the item?
A minimal example
Am 04.01.2012 um 16:25 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Why does framedtext extends to the right in \itemize? Shouldn't the width be
reduced by the extend of the item-shift? Isn't that the idea behind the
fit-parameter.
It wouldn't be a problem to calculate a reduced width, but how can I
That is it! Thanks.
Hans van der Meer
On 4 jan. 2012, at 17:09, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 04.01.2012 um 16:25 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Why does framedtext extends to the right in \itemize? Shouldn't the width be
reduced by the extend of the item-shift? Isn't that the idea behind
Hi Hans,
another one.
\setupbackend[export=yes]
\starttext
\startitemize
\startitem test \stopitem
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Works with the beta but is broken in the experimental branch.
Regards
Andreas
On 2-1-2012 17:29, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi Hans,
another one.
\setupbackend[export=yes]
\starttext
\startitemize
\startitem test \stopitem
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Works with the beta but is broken in the experimental branch.
What is the difference between these two?
On 02.01.2012, at 17:32, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2-1-2012 17:29, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi Hans,
another one.
\setupbackend[export=yes]
\starttext
\startitemize
\startitem test \stopitem
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Works with the beta but is broken in the experimental branch.
This worked some weeks ago:
\defineconversion[ordinal][\enordinaldaynumber]
\starttext
\startitemize[ordinal]
\item Test
\item Test
\item Test
\item Test
\item Test
\stopitemize
\stoptext
current beta from today
Herbert
! Undefined control sequence.
system tex error on
}
\unexpanded\def\itemgroups_start_items[#whatever]%
which should be
\unexpanded\def\itemgroups_start_items
{\dosingleempty\itemgroups_start_items_indeed}
\unexpanded\def\itemgroups_start_items_indeed[#whatever]%
(else the check for [] gets lost)
thanks for testing (I cleaned up the itemize code
this one also worked some weeks ago:
\mainlanguage[de]
\starttext
\startitemize[8,packed]
[width=8em,distance=2em,items=5]
\ran {no\hss yes}
\its I can not do it without \TeX.
\mar{+} I use \TeX\ with other packages.
\its I hardly use \TeX.
\ran{\hss The future\hss}
\its I
On 29-12-2011 13:55, Herbert Voss wrote:
\defineconversion[ordinal][\enordinaldaynumber]
use
\defineconversion[ordinal][\ordinaldaynumber]
instead ... it adapts itself to the current language
(I'm cleaning up modules and removing off cases and that was one of
them, as it makes no sense to
Hi Hans,
many thanks fort the itemize fixes!
I’ve found another problem with the latest beta.
\setupbackend[export=yes]
\starttext
\startitemize
\item test
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Regards
Andreas
Hi,
With the latest beta
\setupitemize[2][packed,joinedup]
gives
checkmissing or ungrouped '=' after 'packed' in line 2
(@@opitemize:2:)
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as
On 18-12-2011 19:18, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
With the latest beta
\setupitemize[2][packed,joinedup]
gives
check missing or ungrouped '=' after 'packed' in line 2 (@@opitemize:2:)
fixed in next upload (case _a and _b needs to be swapped)
Hans
Hi Hans,
itemize with option “text” gives me still an error (beta: 15-Dec-2011 09:27).
\startitemize[text]
\item alpha \item beta \item gamma
\stopitemize
Regards
Andreas
___
If your question
On 15 déc. 2011, at 10:38, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi Hans,
itemize with option “text” gives me still an error (beta: 15-Dec-2011 09:27).
\startitemize[text]
\item alpha \item beta \item gamma
\stopitemize
Regards
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
It is correct that the latest beta has
On 7-12-2011 05:41, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Grid layout gets broken if I use \startitemize[column,two].
quick fix in next beta
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 |
Hi all,
is there an itemize option, so that the \blank[-line] in the following example
is not needed? If not, can we have one?
\starttext \showframe
\definedescription[Test]
\startTest {head}
% \blank[-line]
\startitemize[joinedup]
\item one \item two
\stopitemize
\stopTest
Hi,
Grid layout gets broken if I use \startitemize[column,two].
\setuplayout[grid=on]
\showgrid
\starttext
\input knuth
\startitemize[packed]
\item One
\item Two
\item Three
\item Four
\stopitemize
\input knuth
\startitemize[two,columns]
\item One
\item Two
\item Three
\item
On 17-11-2011 15:32, Troy Henderson wrote:
Occasionally when I use a two column itemize like
\startitemize[n,a,columns,two]
\item some text\column
\item some more text
\stopitemize
near the bottom of a page, the second column item gets sent to the next
page but the first column
Occasionally when I use a two column itemize like
\startitemize[n,a,columns,two]
\item some text\column
\item some more text
\stopitemize
near the bottom of a page, the second column item gets sent to the next
page but the first column item stays on the current page
On 26-9-2011 08:46, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29, R. Ermers wrote:
Snippets from log file:
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
Independent of everything else that has been said in that thread:
wouldn't it be nice to simply fall back on Latin
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 19:44, Hans Hagen wrote:
there is some fall back mechanism that does that but as soon as one defined
his/her own typescript that can interfere
How should we define trypescripts to avoid interference then?
Mojca
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29, R. Ermers wrote:
Snippets from log file:
! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
Independent of everything else that has been said in that thread:
wouldn't it be nice to simply fall back on Latin Modern for math when
some font doesn't provide
Am 26.09.2011 um 00:23 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, R. Ermers wrote:
My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though.
Apparently there is no math fallback.
Hard to say without an example.
Any suggestions?
Use text mode fractions!
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Any suggestions?
Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}.
This is still typeset in math mode. A alternative is to write the fraction as
“1/40”.
¼÷10, 0.025.
How about:
\definetypeface [xits] [mm] [math] [xits] [default]
Am 26.09.2011 um 10:49 schrieb Alan Braslau:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:34:45AM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Any suggestions?
Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}.
This is still typeset in math mode. A alternative is to write the fraction
as “1/40”.
¼÷10, 0.025.
Am Montag, den 26.09.2011, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
\definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes,script=latn]
\setupbodyfont[cambria]
Is there a font in Standalone which can be used to demonstrate the
behavior?
\starttext
1/40 {\setff{frac}1/40} \m{\frac{1}{40}}
With
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:31:09AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.09.2011, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
\definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes,script=latn]
\setupbodyfont[cambria]
Is there a font in Standalone which can be used to demonstrate the
behavior?
XITS, but
Thanks all, for your reactions.
I tried them all, but the process still stops at the \frac, which I changed now
into \frac{1}{40}, whatever I do.
The gentium font does not load properly; the file is typeset in Times instead.
I get these strange references to gentium instead.
Regards,
Robert
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:29:32AM +0200, R. Ermers wrote:
Dear all,
After my update a few days ago I have run into the problem earlier described
under the subject new beta (Marco Pessotto). The file processed nicely
until then. I use gentium as the main font.
Am 24.09.2011 um 11:29 schrieb R. Ermers:
Dear all,
After my update a few days ago I have run into the problem earlier described
under the subject new beta (Marco Pessotto). The file processed nicely
until then. I use gentium as the main font.
\definefont[gentium][Xserif][name:Gentium
Thanks for all your replies!
I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item:
$\frac1{40}$ in the whole text.
I am using mkiv.
Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was processed fine.
I add a minimal example below.
Thanks again for looking into this problem.
Am 25.09.2011 um 15:08 schrieb R. Ermers:
Thanks for all your replies!
I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item:
$\frac1{40}$ in the whole text.
I am using mkiv.
Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was processed fine.
I add a minimal example
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.09.2011 um 15:08 schrieb R. Ermers:
Thanks for all your replies!
I changed the superscript e into \high{e}. There is one other math item:
$\frac1{40}$ in the whole text.
I am using mkiv.
Until the recent update the document (90 pp.) was
][\textbullet]
As an added benefit, it gives a better output when exporting to xhtml.
You can get text symbols for itemize with “\setupsymbolset[text]”.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
Thanks for all advices!
I solved the problem, at least partially.
I now use \usetypescriptfile[type-gentium]
For some reason I have to change the signs in the unnumbered lists.
My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though.
Apparently there is no math fallback.
Any
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, R. Ermers wrote:
My one and only math item -- $\frac1{40}$ -- does cause a problem though.
Apparently there is no math fallback.
Hard to say without an example.
Any suggestions?
Use text mode fractions! \frac{1}{40}.
Aditya
Dear all,
After my update a few days ago I have run into the problem earlier described
under the subject new beta (Marco Pessotto). The file processed nicely until
then. I use gentium as the main font.
\definefont[gentium][Xserif][name:Gentium at 12pt]
See more details underneath.
I am right
:\currentitemgroup,
but my solution above doesn’t work with complex itemize constructs.
and then add (someplace) in the define macro:
\definestructureconversionset[itemgroup:#1][\currentitemconversionset][\currentitemsymbol]%
and at the end of the restarter:
\ifx\currentrepeatstart\empty
Am 07.09.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
I want items to display as follows (| represents the text area edge)
| 1. First item
| 2. Second item
| 2.1 Sub item
| 2.2 Sub item
| 3. Third item
I could not find a way to control the margin of the second
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 07.09.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
I want items to display as follows (| represents the text area edge)
| 1. First item
| 2. Second item
| 2.1 Sub item
| 2.2 Sub item
| 3. Third item
I could not find a way
In MkIV, \startitemize[n,repeat] gives a result that does not look right.
The numbers of the first level of itemize are missing.
\starttext
\startitemize[n,repeat]
\item One
\item Two
\startitemize[n]
\item Sub one
\item Sub two
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
I am
Am 08.09.2011 um 10:05 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
In MkIV, \startitemize[n,repeat] gives a result that does not look right. The
numbers of the first level of itemize are missing.
As you brought this up I’ll add another problem with repeated items (it shows
also your problem). When you can
work with complex itemize constructs.
and then add (someplace) in the define macro:
\definestructureconversionset[itemgroup:#1][\currentitemconversionset][\currentitemsymbol]%
and at the end of the restarter:
\ifx\currentrepeatstart\empty
\let\currentitemconversionset\currentitemsymbol
Hi,
I want items to display as follows (| represents the text area edge)
| 1. First item
| 2. Second item
| 2.1 Sub item
| 2.2 Sub item
| 3. Third item
I could not find a way to control the margin of the second level. Setting
\setupitemize[1][margin=2em]
Hi,
I sometimes misuse the command key of itemize like this:
\definehighlight[important][style=italic, color=red]
\starttext
\startitemize[command=\important]
\item {Term}: definition
\stopitemize
\stoptext
However when I try this with
\setupbackend[export=yes]
I get the following error
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I sometimes misuse the command key of itemize like this:
\definehighlight[important][style=italic, color=red]
\starttext
\startitemize[command=\important]
\item {Term}: definition
\stopitemize
\stoptext
However when I try
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I sometimes misuse the command key of itemize like this:
\definehighlight[important][style=italic, color=red]
Sorry...this works. My test file had
\definehighlight[important][style=em, color=red]
which fails even for
\important{A}
For pdf outout
Hi,
is it possible to right-align enumerations? Giving
something like the following
This is the first item *
A somewhat longer second item *
A short third item *
Thanks
Erik
No but you can use descriptions to get this output:
\definedescription
[myitem]
Hi all,
is it possible to assign different styles to each itemgroup or level of
'itemization'?
It is possible when using \head to assign a headstyle, but wouldn't it be
nice to assign a certain textstyle to an item level?
Consider something heavily customized (but still useful IMHO) like this:
1.
Am 07.07.2011 um 16:21 schrieb Christian:
Hi all,
is it possible to assign different styles to each itemgroup or level of
'itemization'?
It is possible when using \head to assign a headstyle, but wouldn't it be
nice to assign a certain textstyle to an item level?
Consider something
Consider something heavily customized (but still useful IMHO) like this:
1. First Level (bold, small caps)
- Second level (normal)
third level (italic)
* fourth level (smaller font [\tfx], text color dark
gray)
I somehow can't find a way to
\stopitemize
\stoptext
What you can also do is to ask Hans for style and color keys
to change the layout of the itemize content (would then only
be available when you use \startitem ... \stopitem).
Wolfgang
___
If your
\stoptext
What you can also do is to ask Hans for style and color keys to change the
layout of the itemize content (would then only be available when you use
\startitem ... \stopitem).
Thank you very much for this example!
This is already more than enough for a starting point. I guess the style
Am 07.07.2011 um 20:19 schrieb Christian:
Thank you very much for this example!
This is already more than enough for a starting point. I guess the style and
color keys for items might be an idea to hold on to. But at the moment I
neither do want to push this, nor is there the urgent need
Perfect, thanks!
If anyone is interested, there is a sample attached which demonstrates the problem and
the solution by autointro.
Lukas
Add: into to \startitemize
\startitemize[intro]
\item ...
\item ...
\item ...
\stopitemize
Or you can use \setupitemize[autointro]
Aditya
BTW, is there a difference between \startitemize[intro] and
\startitemize[autointro]?
- I tried both and both do the desired effect.
- autointro was your suggestion for \setupitemize whilst intro was option
for \startitemize...
Kind regards,
Lukas
\startitemize[intro]
\item ...
Am 31.03.2011 um 12:11 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
BTW, is there a difference between \startitemize[intro] and
\startitemize[autointro]?
Yes, “autointro” prevents a page break only when the last paragraph
has only one or two lines while “intro” always prevents a page
Hello,
I used the following setup for title:
\setuphead[title][style=\bfb,align=middle,after=\blank]
Then, in the middle of the source code, I used:
\title{A title}
% Unwanted page break here!
\startitemize
\item ...
\item ...
\item ...
\stopitemize
But it happened
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
Hello,
I used the following setup for title:
\setuphead[title][style=\bfb,align=middle,after=\blank]
Then, in the middle of the source code, I used:
\title{A title}
% Unwanted page break here!
Add: into to \startitemize
Am 26.03.2011 um 20:24 schrieb Andreas Harder:
Hi all,
the fit-option in itemize-environments seem to be broken. Can someone confirm
this?
strc-itm.mkiv (wrong order of arguments for \simplealignedbox):
\def\dolistitem % evt aantal items opslaan per niveau, scheelt zoeken
On 27-3-2011 8:06, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\def\dolistitem % evt aantal items opslaan per niveau, scheelt zoeken
thanks, fixed
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 |
Hi all,
the fit-option in itemize-environments seem to be broken. Can someone confirm
this?
\starttext
\startitemize[R,fit] % ,fit - error
\dorecurse{8}{\item test}
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Greeting
Andreas
2011/3/20 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com
Am 20.03.2011 um 22:08 schrieb Vedran Miletić:
Hi,
the following code makes first footnote disappear.
\starttext
\placetable{My table}{\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD {\bf Something} \eTD \bTD \startitemize[1, packed]
\item
Hi,
the following code makes first footnote disappear.
\starttext
\placetable{My table}{\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD {\bf Something} \eTD \bTD \startitemize[1, packed]
\item First
\item Second\footnote{test1} hello
\item Third\footnote{test2} hello
\stopitemize \eTD \eTR
\eTABLEbody
Am 20.03.2011 um 22:08 schrieb Vedran Miletić:
Hi,
the following code makes first footnote disappear.
\starttext
\placetable{My table}{\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD {\bf Something} \eTD \bTD \startitemize[1, packed]
\item First
\item Second\footnote{test1} hello
\item
Am 11.03.2011 um 04:07 schrieb Alasdair McAndrew:
The trouble arises when I put my tables into narrower, framedtext so as to be
able to force proper indentation:
Use tabulate.
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\dorecurse{20}
{\item This is a test
\starttabulate[|*{8}{l|}]
\NC (a) \NC
Thank you - that works fine; especially the first, in which the problems
read in order across, rather than down in columns.
cheers,
Alasdair
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 11.03.2011 um 04:07 schrieb Alasdair McAndrew:
The
On 10-3-2011 8:10, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
I am setting up notes and exercises for my students. Each set of exercises
is in an itemize environment, and each \item consists of a table of
problems. The trouble is, the itemize doesn't break across pages - I have
to put manual page breaks
, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 10-3-2011 8:10, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
I am setting up notes and exercises for my students. Each set of
exercises
is in an itemize environment, and each \item consists of a table of
problems. The trouble is, the itemize doesn't break across pages - I have
I am setting up notes and exercises for my students. Each set of exercises
is in an itemize environment, and each \item consists of a table of
problems. The trouble is, the itemize doesn't break across pages - I have
to put manual page breaks in.
How can I encourage automatic page-breaks
Hi all,
consider the following example. I there a proper way to hook \tfxx in an
itemize environment?
\starttext \showframe
\startitemize[n,packed][before=\tfxx,distance=5em]
\dorecurse{12}{\item test}
\stopitemize
Desired output is:
\tfxx
\startitemize[n,packed][distance=5em
Dear Li,
Thank you for the solution.
It works fine.
In ConTeXt, there are so many hidden jewelry for a simple user like me.
But it is a joy to find one by one.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
Hi Dalyoung,
??? (happy new year)?
You can try \setupitemize[symalign=flushright,distance=0.5em].
Dear Li,
Thank you for the solution.
It works fine.
In ConTeXt, there are so many hidden jewelry for a simple user like me.
But it is a joy to find one by one.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
Hi Dalyoung,
??? (happy new year)?
You can try \setupitemize[symalign=flushright,distance=0.5em].
Dear all,
First, yesterday was the new year's day in Lunar calendar, and it is the
biggest holiday in a year for us. So I'd like to say Happy New Year! again.
I use the following code to list some items and avoid the overlapping (viii)
and letters:
\startitemize[r,
2011/2/4 Jeong Dalyoung hak...@me.com:
Dear all,
First, yesterday was the new year's day in Lunar calendar, and it is the
biggest holiday in a year for us. So I'd like to say Happy New Year! again.
I use the following code to list some items and avoid the overlapping (viii)
and letters:
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item [Fiesta]
disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text inside the
brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Acto de Apertura [y muestra de emprendimientos].
\item
items should be enclosed in { } ?
Horacio Suarez
From: horaciosua...@hotmail.com
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:51:48 +
Subject: [NTG-context] itemize and [] question
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Horacio Suarez wrote:
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item [Fiesta]
disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text inside the
brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Acto de
Am 10.11.2010 21:51, schrieb Horacio Suarez:
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item
[Fiesta] disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text
inside the brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Acto de
401 - 500 of 852 matches
Mail list logo
