Sorry, I don't understand what the problem is!
I have a problem with
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item $a_n=2+\frac{1}{n+1}$
\item $a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}}-3$
\stopitemize
Hi,
this did not wotk because the second formula is than the first and
the \column help with the first formula?
Because itemize use for the columns key the multicolumns envrionment
where you can force a new column with the \column command.
The internal work for this case is something like in the following example:
\starttext
\startcolumns
$a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n
I have a problem with
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item $a_n=2+\frac{1}{n+1}$
\item $a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}}-3$
\stopitemize
Hi,
this did not wotk because the second formula is than the first
and
-^ (what?)
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Is there something like an \mathstrut macro? (I know, that there
exists a macro with this name, but that uses ')' as height.)
For single line math, the height of ) is sufficient. If you want larger
heights you can do
Hallo,
I have a problem with
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item $a_n=2+\frac{1}{n+1}$
\item $a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}}-3$
\stopitemize
which is NOT in columns.
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
works!
How can I solve this?
Wolfgang
2007/10/29, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo,
I have a problem with
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item $a_n=2+\frac{1}{n+1}$
\item $a_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}}-3$
\stopitemize
which is NOT in columns.
\startitemize[columns,a]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
works!
Hi,
on debian testing this small file
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
blahblah
\startitemize[n,continue]
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
gives an itemization that starts at zero, plus the continue does not
work either (context version: 2007.09.28 16:52
On 10/10/07, plink wrote:
Hi,
on debian testing this small file
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
blahblah
\startitemize[n,continue]
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
gives an itemization that starts at zero, plus the continue does not
work either
Horacio Suarez wrote:
hello all, generous people:
I have in a file this:
\startitemize[a,packed]
\item uno
\item dos
\stopitemize
If I compile it on windows, (ver 2007.08.29) it´s ok; but if I compile
it on linux ubuntu (context version: 2007.04.17) I get
It was the Ubuntu tex instalation.
Horacio Suarez wrote:
hello all, generous people:
I have in a file this:
\startitemize[a,packed]
\item uno
\item dos
\stopitemize
If I compile it on windows, (ver 2007.08.29) it´s ok; but if I compile
it on linux ubuntu
Horacio Suarez wrote:
It was the Ubuntu tex instalation.
perhaps ctxtools --update will work, bit if not, someone with
an ubuntu system has to jump in (Sanjoy?).
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of
I will update with ctxtools. Thankyou very much.
From: Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users ntg-context@ntg.nl
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] itemize + linux context update
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:54:28 +0200
hello all, generous people:
I have in a file this:
\startitemize[a,packed]
\item uno
\item dos
\stopitemize
If I compile it on windows, (ver 2007.08.29) it´s ok; but if I compile it on
linux ubuntu (context version: 2007.04.17) I get this ERROR:
Missing = inserted for
On 9/6/07, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hallo!
I have tried snippets like
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item zwei
\item drei
\stopitemize
but could'nt found a solution.
It looks like a misfeature (ie. bug) to me
2007/8/28, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo,
how can I start an itemization with 2
I have tried snippets like
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item zwei
\item drei
\stopitemize
but could'nt found a solution.
Btw.: Is there a differenz between
how can I start an itemization with 2
I have tried snippets like
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item zwei
\item drei
\stopitemize
but could'nt found a solution.
Btw.: Is there a differenz between
\setupitemize[]
and
\setupitemgroup
Hallo,
how can I start an itemization with 2
I have tried snippets like
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][start=2]
\startitemize[n]
\item zwei
\item drei
\stopitemize
but could'nt found a solution.
Btw.: Is there a differenz between
\setupitemize[]
and
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][]
Wolfgang
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
With luatex, the following gives
\starttext
\startitemize[r]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
! LuaTeX error
/context/current/texmf/tex/context/base/core-con.lua:163: attempt
to call field 'tolower' (a nil value).
ok, fixed, should be just
With luatex, the following gives
\starttext
\startitemize[r]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
! LuaTeX error
.../context/current/texmf/tex/context/base/core-con.lua:163: attempt
to call field 'tolower' (a nil value).
\romannumerals ...nvert.romannumerals(\number #1)}
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hallo,
has nobody tested this with
did you update?
No, I have not updated yet!
I would like to understand this error first.
Can you please explain, why a comment can toggle an error?
Filtering comments should be very
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hallo,
has nobody tested this with
did you update?
No, I have not updated yet!
I would like to understand this error first.
Can you please explain, why a comment can toggle an error?
Filtering comments should be very low level (plain TeX or ConTeXt
Hallo,
has nobody tested this with
ConTeXt version = 2007.07.03 19:38 MKII?
Wolfgang
Here is an other example!
Remove the three-line-comment, and the error is gone!
Strange what?
Wolfgang
-
\setupbodyfont[sansserif,11pt]
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hallo,
has nobody tested this with
did you update?
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
All,
Has this bug been fixed?
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0$
\item $|x|4$
\stopitemize
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
David Arnold wrote:
All,
Has this bug been fixed?
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0$
\item $|x|4$
\stopitemize
yes
--
-
Hans Hagen |
Hallo!
Here is a minimal example of how this happens. I had posted it
sometime back.
\starttext
\setupitemize[each][][stopper=:]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[a]
\item Bla
\item Blub
\item Bautz
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Here is an other example!
Remove the
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:47:33 -0400
Hamid Kamrani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a minimal example of how this happens. I had posted it sometime back.
\starttext
\setupitemize[each][][stopper=:]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[a]
\item Bla
\item Blub
\item Bautz
\stopitemize
\eTD
someone has found an itemize bug. Is this my problem
too, or what could be my problem.
I tried to create a minimal example. But I am not able to reproduce
the problem in a smaller file.
Wolfgang
___
If your question
not
a: Bla
b: Blub
c: Bautz
A few weeks ago someone has found an itemize bug. Is this my problem
too, or what could be my problem.
I tried to create a minimal example. But I am not able to reproduce
the problem in a smaller file.
hm, looks like somthing gets out of sync
i really
not
a: Bla
b: Blub
c: Bautz
A few weeks ago someone has found an itemize bug. Is this my problem
too, or what could be my problem.
I tried to create a minimal example. But I am not able to reproduce
the problem in a smaller file.
hm, looks like somthing gets out of sync
i really
2007/7/12, David Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All,
Think I found a bug in itemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0$
\item $|x|4$
\stopitemize
\stoptext
On my system, the first item is not labeled, the second and third are
labeled
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:46, David Arnold wrote:
All,
Think I found a bug in itemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0$
\item $|x|4$
\stopitemize
\stoptext
I don't understand your parameters. The Manual allows for columns
/
IntAlgText/fall2007/chapter4/section4.pdf
Example 13 on page 394.
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:09 AM, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:46, David Arnold wrote:
All,
Think I found a bug in itemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0
/fall2007/chapter4/section4.pdf
Example 13 on page 394.
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:09 AM, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:46, David Arnold wrote:
All,
Think I found a bug in itemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0
All,
Think I found a bug in itemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item $|x|-5$
\item $|x|0$
\item $|x|4$
\stopitemize
\stoptext
On my system, the first item is not labeled, the second and third are
labeled a and b.
gimp $ ctxtools --contextversion
CtxTools
Hi,
I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
Patrick
--
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
\startitemize [n]
\item eins
\item zwei
\startitemize
\item dies
Quoting Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
Patrick
--
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
Hi Aditya,
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
\setupitemize[1][packed]
so in this example both are packed :)
Right after sending my mail I realized that this could be used against
me :)
Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
each level. So, only
Quoting Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
each level. So, only way around is to use an explicit unpacked
somewhere, e.g.,
\setupitemize[each][unpacked]
\setupitemize[1][packed]
OK, I see. Is this a feature or a (I
Should I downgrade to an older Context version, or is
there a fix available ?
TIA
Wim
Hamid Kamrani wrote:
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem
This happens on live context too. Itemize starts with 0 in some
situations. You can create the problem with:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\stopitemize
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On 7/1/07, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL
Hi,
When I use
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
the list starts at 0 (zero) instead of 1 (one)
I am using the standalone Windows version
ConTeXt ver: 2007.06.26 23:21 MKII fmt: 2007.7.1 int: english/english
Kind regards
Wim
Hello Wim,
When I use
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
the list starts at 0 (zero) instead of 1 (one)
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item One
\item Two
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Are you sure about this? I've just tried the above in
live.contextgarden.net and the result looks
Patrick et al,
I also tried it on live.contextgarden.net and there it works fine.
But not with my Context.
I have some definitions but they did not change for more than 6 months,
and comparing my setups with some of my backups, nothing has changed.
The only change is that I updated Context with
changed.
The only change is that I updated Context with ctxtools --update from the
Scite menu.
I don't know which of my definitions or setups could cause this. I
am not using \setupitemize. I hope someone can help.
There was some changes in itemize code recently. Hans added
`reverse' option, so
To Aditya
It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
problem reappears. That may help in figuring out if it is something
wrong in
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To Aditya
It is possible that this change caused your existing setup to break.
Can you create a minimum example that exhibits the problem? Start with
Patrick's example, and start adding lines from your setup, so that the
problem reappears. That
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have a reverse key for itemize, so that
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
gives
3. one
2. two
1. three
I thought that this should be easier than random items, but I can not
figure how random
Hi,
Is it possible to have a reverse key for itemize, so that
\startitemize[n,reverse]
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
gives
3. one
2. two
1. three
I thought that this should be easier than random items, but I can not
figure how random key works.
Aditya
locally to itemigroup fixes the problem.
Jano
ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII
%%% minimal example
\enableregime[utf]
\showgrid
\showstruts
%\setuplayout[grid=yes]
%\setupitemgroup[itemize][before={\lineskiplimit=-10pt}]
aaa
bbb
ccc
Ú ddd
eee
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item aaa
everything is OK.
Changing \lineskiplimit locally to itemigroup fixes the problem.
Jano
ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII
%%% minimal example
\enableregime[utf]
\showgrid
\showstruts
%\setuplayout[grid=yes]
%\setupitemgroup[itemize][before={\lineskiplimit=-10pt}]
aaa
bbb
ccc
Ú ddd
eee
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2007/4/24, Jano Kula [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The strut at the begining of an item in the itemgroup breaks the line
skip (even if it is set on grid) if there is some accent above the
uppercase letter. Contrary to normal text, where
Hallo!
use \par at the end of the question
Why?
\question pick up it sargument and uses \par as delimiter, otherwise
we could not apply attributes to the question text
\question is the 'minimalistic approach,
\startquestion
\stopquestion
is the best way ans works
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini schrieb:
Hallo,
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
\starttext
Hi Bernd!
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
\starttext
\chapter{Aufgaben}
\beginquestion
Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hi Bernd!
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
\starttext
2007/4/4, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo,
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
Hallo,
what I am doing wrong with the following snipped?
The \par in the \item does not work.
---
\defineenumeration[question][location=top,text=Aufgabe]
\defineblock[question]
\starttext
\chapter{Aufgaben}
\beginquestion
\question
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
\placefigure will always start a new paragraph, but usually you don't
notice that since you want it in a separate paragraph anyway. It has
to do with boxes, although I have no idea how exactly Hans implemented
itemize/itemgroup environment.
You can help yourself a bit
Hi,
as soon as I put a placefigure in an \item paragraph, the whole
paragraph starts one line below the stopper. Is this a conceptual issue
or just a weirdness?
What is the best way to start at the same height? I couldn´t find
anything in the wiki or the details ...
As an example, see:
it in a separate paragraph anyway. It has
to do with boxes, although I have no idea how exactly Hans implemented
itemize/itemgroup environment.
You can help yourself a bit by using
\item \strut\vskip -\lineheight\placefigure...
although there should be a better solution. (I would agree
Peter Rolf schrieb:
Lutz Haseloff wrote:
Peter Rolf schrieb:
just guessing (but worth a try):
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=any fixed dimen]
The default is .5ex, which depends on the current font (see end of
core-itm.tex).
HTH, Peter
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=2cm]
doesn't work.
Hi all,
If I use:
\startitemize[m,packed]
\item 三个小矮人 (some chinese characters)
\item Die drei Männlein im Walde
\stopitemize
I get more space between the number and the text in the
chinese line as in the latin line.
The difference is .3-.4em depending on the fonts.
How can I avoid this?
Lutz Haseloff wrote:
Hi all,
If I use:
\startitemize[m,packed]
\item 三个小矮人 (some chinese characters)
\item Die drei Männlein im Walde
\stopitemize
I get more space between the number and the text in the
chinese line as in the latin line.
The difference is .3-.4em depending on the
Peter Rolf schrieb:
just guessing (but worth a try):
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=any fixed dimen]
The default is .5ex, which depends on the current font (see end of
core-itm.tex).
HTH, Peter
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=2cm]
doesn't work.
Iterestingly an inserted \mbox makes the error
Lutz Haseloff wrote:
Peter Rolf schrieb:
just guessing (but worth a try):
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=any fixed dimen]
The default is .5ex, which depends on the current font (see end of
core-itm.tex).
HTH, Peter
\setupitemgroups[inbetween=2cm]
doesn't work.
Iterestingly an inserted
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
% frenchitemize
\setbox0=\hbox{--~}
\def\indenteddash#1{\hskip\parindent--~}
\definesymbol[indentdash][\indenteddash]
\def\startfrenchitemize{\startitemize[indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\parindent + \wd0 \relax]}
Hi all,
Some times ago, Taco helps me to define a custom itemize:
\setbox0=\hbox{--~}
\def\indenteddash#1{\hskip\parindent--~}
\definesymbol[indentdash][\indenteddash]
\setupitemize[each][indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\parindent + \wd0 \relax]
The result
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi all,
Some times ago, Taco helps me to define a custom itemize:
\setbox0=\hbox{--~}
\def\indenteddash#1{\hskip\parindent--~}
\definesymbol[indentdash][\indenteddash]
\setupitemize[each][indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\stopfrenchenumerate{\stopitemize}
% default behavior of itemize (frenchitemize)
\setupitemize[each][indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\parindent + \wd0 \relax]
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman
Hi,
I tried to play with \setupitemize, and I can't figure out what the
key distance actually does.
For example, the following two lines seem to produce the same effect:
\setupitemize[each][packed][width=20pt,distance=15pt]
\setupitemize[each][packed][width=20pt,distance=5pt]
Can someone
width is the size of the box containing the item number
distance is the distance between the item number box and the beginning of the
text of the item.
Helin Gai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to play with \setupitemize, and I can't figure out what the
key distance actually
Hi,
I am fighting to change the interlinespace in item text.
For instance:
\startitemize
\item This is the text
% here the interline space is very small
of the first item
\stopitemize
By the way, is there a way to change the font
depending on the item level?
Olivier
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Na Li wrote:
Another question, if I do
\startitemize[n]
\item
\startmylist
\item
\stopmylist
\stopitemize
The numbers, '1', '2', etc, from the outer list does not line up with
the first line of the inner list. How can that be fixed?
Try
On 9 May 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Na Li wrote:
Is there a way of defining an itemize style without having to specify
the same set of options to \startitemize every time? Something like:
\defineitemize[myitemize][s,packed][width=5em,stopper=:,style=bold]
\defineitemgroup
That does
I need use repeatedly a list like this, with the same set of words (five
or six of them), 'icon', 'coni', etc,
\startitemize[width=3em,symstyle=bold]
\sym{icon} blah
\sym{coni} llla
\stopitemize
How to define a customized list so I can do:
\startmylist
\item blah
\item llla
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Na Li wrote:
I need use repeatedly a list like this, with the same set of words (five
or six of them), 'icon', 'coni', etc,
\startitemize[width=3em,symstyle=bold]
\sym{icon} blah
\sym{coni} llla
\stopitemize
How to define a customized list so I can do:
=:,style=bold]
\item blah
\item lla
\stopitemize
Is there a way of defining an itemize style without having to specify
the same set of options to \startitemize every time? Something like:
\defineitemize[myitemize][s,packed][width=5em,stopper=:,style=bold]
Michael
Na Li wrote:
Is there a way of defining an itemize style without having to specify
the same set of options to \startitemize every time? Something like:
\defineitemize[myitemize][s,packed][width=5em,stopper=:,style=bold]
\defineitemgroup
Hans
On Fri, 5 May 2006 01:37:45 -0400 (EDT), Aditya Mahajan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's it. I wondered if it was possible a to specify a different
symbol for a head, something like this:
\startitemize[n][headstyle=bold]
\head Default head symbol (here a number)\par Body
\head Default
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, nico wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:13:09 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nico wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like
\sym
does for \item?
i'm not sure if i understand the question ... heads are like items so
Olivier wrote:
Is there a way to achieve this?
There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
Cheers, taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Hi Taco,
Quoting Taco Hoekwater :
-- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
Olivier wrote:
Is there a way to achieve this?
There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
I forgot to emphasize that the
Olivier wrote:
Hi Taco,
Quoting Taco Hoekwater :
-- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
Olivier wrote:
Is there a way to achieve this?
There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
indeed put
Olivier wrote:
Hi Taco,
Quoting Taco Hoekwater :
-- was [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:20 --
Olivier wrote:
Is there a way to achieve this?
There is probably a nicer solution, but this works:
\startitemize[inbetween={\blank[30pt]\hrule height 0pt}]
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:13:09 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nico wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like
\sym
does for \item?
i'm not sure if i understand the question ... heads are like items so
the same symbols apply (or do
nico wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like \sym
does for \item?
i'm not sure if i understand the question ... heads are like items so the same
symbols apply (or do you want different symbols for \item and \head in one
itemize
Hello,
When a reference is set to \head, a space after the square brackets
appears in the output. Shouldn't it be ignored? Applying a reference to
\item does not show the problem.
Besides, what is the best way to put item or head text in square brackets?
Using \relax works but I'm not sure
� wrote:
Hello,
is it normal, that the first margin=5em is not taken into account, but
the with \setupitemize it works?
Perhaps I misunderstand the second argument of \startitemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[packed][margin=5em]
\item bla
\item bla
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[margin=5em]
Hello,
Is it possible to change the symbol of \head in an itemize list, like \sym
does for \item?
Regards,
BG
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hello,
is it normal, that the first margin=5em is not taken into account, but
the with \setupitemize it works?
Perhaps I misunderstand the second argument of \startitemize.
\starttext
\startitemize[packed][margin=5em]
\item bla
\item bla
\stopitemize
\setupitemize[margin=5em]
Thanks Taco to help me on this issue.
I eventually use (allmost copy-paste from #context):
\setbox0=\hbox{--~}
\def\indenteddash#1{\hskip\parindent--~}
\definesymbol[indentdash][\indenteddash]
\setupitemize[each][indentdash,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes,width=\dimexpr
\parindent +
Hi all,
(see [NTG-context] itemize)
Now I use
\setupitemize[each][2,packed,joinedup,intext][indentnext=yes] % thanks
Hans for intext !
but I don't obtain indentation of the first line of each item...
i.e. I got
Un petit paragraphe
qui continue la ligne.
- le premier lment de
la liste
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi all,
Up to now, I used:
\startnarrower[left]
\startitemize[2,packed,joinedup]
\item 4 liaisons pivot (1 degré de liberté en rotation) soit 4 couples
cinématiques de classe V,
\item 1 liaison pivot glissant (2 degrés de liberté dont 1 en rotation
et 1 en
Hi all,
Up to now, I used:
\startnarrower[left]
\startitemize[2,packed,joinedup]
\item 4 liaisons pivot (1 degr de libert en rotation) soit 4 couples
cinmatiques de classe V,
\item 1 liaison pivot glissant (2 degrs de libert dont 1 en rotation
et 1 en translation) soit 1 couple cinmatique
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
No, the internal macro \dododosetupitemgroupconstant has bug.
The loose line has to be:
\v!loose*=\setfalse\optimizelistitem,
instead of
\v!loose*=\optimizeitemsfalse,
ah, stupid me, repaired
Hans
When typesetting an enumeration with a specified item text I
encountered an error with the combination of [loose] with \sym{} and
\mar{}.
The hope was that loose will allow underfull filling of the lines
without complaint (I don't like TeX complaining)
An example follows:
\starttext
Hi all,
\startnarrower[left]
\startitemize[1]
\item
\stopitemize
\stopnarrower
Is there another solution in order to ident itemize ?
Since many french documents need indentation of every paragraph and itemize,
maybe it will be a good idea to manage this behavior
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Try this code out with:
\startitemize
\item \XETEX
\item \PDFETEX
\stopitemize
it seems a bug..
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Cute little bug!
*extremely* sneaky workaround follows:
\setbox2=\hbox{\XETEX}
\def\XETEX{\copy2 }
Greetings, Taco
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Try this code out with:
\startitemize
\item \XETEX
\item \PDFETEX
\stopitemize
I have a feeling that \mirror and itemize interfere in a strage
701 - 800 of 852 matches
Mail list logo
