Re: [NTG-context] [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] circuitikz module seems broken

2021-12-07 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 12/6/2021 9:49 PM, Jan-Erik Hägglöf via ntg-context wrote: Ok, so if I understand this correctly, you recommend install directly from ctan. The question is, I’m not sure how, but is it the tds arcive? i'm not sure how that gets updated but as tikz is a constantly moving i just got it from

Re: [NTG-context] [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] circuitikz module seems broken

2021-12-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > On 12/4/2021 10:37 PM, Jan-Erik Hägglöf via ntg-context wrote: > > I did replace the attached .mkxl files now in the correct directory tree > together with the rest of all m-xyz.mkxl module files. > > > > The same error message appears and

Re: [NTG-context] [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] circuitikz module seems broken

2021-12-05 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 12/4/2021 10:37 PM, Jan-Erik Hägglöf via ntg-context wrote: I did replace the attached .mkxl files now in the correct directory tree together with the rest of all m-xyz.mkxl module files. The same error message appears and i’m back at square one. hm, here i did: - install tikz from ctan -

Re: [NTG-context] [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] Re: [DKIM] circuitikz module seems broken

2021-12-03 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 12/3/2021 3:17 PM, skrantajanneman via ntg-context wrote: My thougts on this, if it is a possible alternative, to do such things in metafun instead? i guess so but we needs specs etc and time (nothing wrong with using tikz if one likes the syntax, apart from it being a dependency and a