On 5/28/2021 16:33, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2021 19:52:19 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category.
APA explicitly, and for good reason, accounts for self-publishing,
indicating that the Author was the publisher.
Ah ok, that
On Fri, 28 May 2021 19:52:19 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
> > If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category.
> > APA explicitly, and for good reason, accounts for self-publishing,
> > indicating that the Author was the publisher.
>
> Ah ok, that explains the output I was
On 2021-05-28, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:02:10 -0400 (EDT)
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> > If you have not defined a publisher, how should ANY format place the
>> > undefined publisher's name?
>>
>> Simply leave it blank?
>
> If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a
On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:02:10 -0400 (EDT)
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > If you have not defined a publisher, how should ANY format place the
> > undefined publisher's name?
>
> Simply leave it blank?
If there is no publisher, then @unpublished is a better category. APA
explicitly, and for good
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 20:21:55 - (UTC)
> Nicola wrote:
>
> > Thank you all for the precious comments.
> >
> > The current LMTX appears to have almost fixed my issue, except that
> > inproceedings entries without a publisher have the text "Author"
>
On Thu, 27 May 2021 20:21:55 - (UTC)
Nicola wrote:
> Thank you all for the precious comments.
>
> The current LMTX appears to have almost fixed my issue, except that
> inproceedings entries without a publisher have the text "Author"
> instead of the publisher's name.
>
> I must say that I
On 2021-05-25, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2021 23:10:34 -0400
> Rik Kabel wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5/24/2021 22:12, Alan Braslau wrote:
>> > On Mon, 24 May 2021 17:53:49 -0400
>> > Rik Kabel wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is intended. Or rather, it is a side-effect of the intended
>> >> behavior.
>>
On Mon, 24 May 2021 23:10:34 -0400
Rik Kabel wrote:
>
> On 5/24/2021 22:12, Alan Braslau wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 May 2021 17:53:49 -0400
> > Rik Kabel wrote:
> >
> >> This is intended. Or rather, it is a side-effect of the intended
> >> behavior.
> >>
> >> If you add an editor ("editor={Baz,
On 5/24/2021 22:12, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2021 17:53:49 -0400
Rik Kabel wrote:
This is intended. Or rather, it is a side-effect of the intended
behavior.
If you add an editor ("editor={Baz, Bar}") you will get something
like:
Foo, B. (1983). Title of the paper. In B. Baz
On Mon, 24 May 2021 17:53:49 -0400
Rik Kabel wrote:
> This is intended. Or rather, it is a side-effect of the intended
> behavior.
>
> If you add an editor ("editor={Baz, Bar}") you will get something
> like:
>
> Foo, B. (1983). Title of the paper. In B. Baz (Ed.), /Booktitle/.
>
On 5/24/2021 16:28, Nicola wrote:
I don't know if this is restricted to inproceedings entries, but
consider the following test.bib:
@inproceedings{Foo:1983,
author = {Foo, Bar},
booktitle = {Booktitle},
pages = {34--39},
title = {Title of the paper},
I don't know if this is restricted to inproceedings entries, but
consider the following test.bib:
@inproceedings{Foo:1983,
author = {Foo, Bar},
booktitle = {Booktitle},
pages = {34--39},
title = {Title of the paper},
year = {1983}
}
When this is typeset:
12 matches
Mail list logo
