Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

Does anyone have a tip for me? I really want these tags in my document. Many thanks in advance, On 27 February 2017 at 19:22, Antoine Cailliau wrote: > I try to replicate the following : https://mailman.ntg.nl/ > pipermail/ntg-context/2006/021038.html (i.e. the

Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

I try to replicate the following : https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2006/021038.html (i.e. the equivalent of \tag in latex/amsmath). More precisely this: > %8<-- > \def\placeformulatag% >{\dosingleempty\doplaceformulatag} >

Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

Thanks. I updated the wiki. On 27 February 2017 at 17:18, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote: > > The following code is documented to change the numbering of the > equations. > > However, this still use numerals for the equations. > > [...] >

Re: [NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

On 02/27/2017 04:55 PM, Antoine Cailliau wrote: > The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. > However, this still use numerals for the equations. > [...] > Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change the numbering ? Hi Antoine, it’s numberconversion (as it

[NTG-context] Formula numbering conversion

The following code is documented to change the numbering of the equations. However, this still use numerals for the equations. \setupformulas[conversion=characters] \starttext \placeformula[test] \startformula E = mc^2 \stopformula \stoptext Is this a bug ? Is it the correct way to change