Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-03-13 Thread h h extern
David Wooten wrote: I'm back to ask another question: After an initial successful installation of the purchased fonts, I've come to find that there is a serious quirk. That is, when I try to use any special glyph, be it an accented character of any kind, or e.g. an eth. The result of something

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-03-12 Thread Adam Lindsay
David Wooten said this at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:40:14 -0800: That is, when I try to use any special glyph, be it an accented character of any kind, or e.g. an eth. Hi David, I took a look at your file (off-list), and it looks like you're using the 8r encoding. Interesting that you bring the eth

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-03-12 Thread David Wooten
On Mar 12, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Adam Lindsay wrote: David Wooten said this at Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:07:25 -0800: Hmm. What do your typescript definitions look like, then? Does ConTeXt know you're using 8r as the encoding for the font? I believe so. An example from the typescript file:

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-03-11 Thread David Wooten
Greetings ConTeXters I'm back to ask another question: After an initial successful installation of the purchased fonts, I've come to find that there is a serious quirk. That is, when I try to use any special glyph, be it an accented character of any kind, or e.g. an eth. The result of something

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-03-11 Thread Adam Lindsay
David Wooten said this at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:40:14 -0800: After an initial successful installation of the purchased fonts, I've come to find that there is a serious quirk. That is, when I try to use any special glyph, be it an accented character of any kind, or e.g. an eth. The result of

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-02-24 Thread David Wooten
Thanks so much! After a fair amount of tinkering testing, I've got it worked out. Regards, David Wooten On Feb 21, 2005, at 1:17 AM, Adam Lindsay wrote: Thomas A.Schmitz said this at Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:50 +0100: Just a quick reply: having the afm is already very good. The file without an

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-02-21 Thread Thomas A . Schmitz
Just a quick reply: having the afm is already very good. The file without an extension looks suspiciously like a Mac font resource. Can you try running the utility fondu on it (from the command line)? That will usually produce the pfbs (very likely, there's more than one: roman, italics, bold

[NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-02-21 Thread David Wooten
Greetings all, I've been having a lot of fun struggling with the installation of a newly purchased font, and wanted to double check a preliminary question before I give in and ask a more thorough question ;) I'm working with Mac OS X, so I bought a font-set with both Mac TTF and Postscript

Re: [NTG-context] Initial Font Installation Question (Mac)

2005-02-21 Thread Adam Lindsay
Thomas A.Schmitz said this at Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:50 +0100: Just a quick reply: having the afm is already very good. The file without an extension looks suspiciously like a Mac font resource. Can you try running the utility fondu on it (from the command line)? That will usually produce the