On 5/3/07, Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this is an interesting discussion. I admit, that I do not have the
ultimate knowledge. Nevertheless I doubt whether the A3 format has to
be considered portrait.
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Image:SRA3.jpg
--
luigi
Am 2007-05-03 um 21:19 schrieb Willi Egger:
Consider A4 which is portrait because of the grain direction
(Laufrichtung) in the height. Otherwise A3 is two A4 and hence the
grain direction is in the shorthand. - Generally speaking the
graindirection is in the direction of the longer edge in
see also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PaperSizes
wow!
I never heard of RA/SRA sizes before (doubt that they're
standardized),
hmm, see
http://www.edsebooks.com/paper/naukeupaper.html
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_217
--
luigi
Am 2007-05-04 um 14:51 schrieb luigi scarso:
see also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PaperSizes
wow!
I never heard of RA/SRA sizes before (doubt that they're
standardized),
hmm, see
http://www.edsebooks.com/paper/naukeupaper.html
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_217
Thank you! Looks
[...]
see also http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PaperSizes
I never heard of RA/SRA sizes before (doubt that they're
standardized), but feel free to add them as soon as the wiki has moved.
It has moved - now I am waiting for the dns servers to update the new
IP.
Patrick
In page-lay.tex
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=320mm,\c!height=450mm]
maybe is wrong.
It should be
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=450mm,\c!height=320mm]
See http://www.theearthpaper.net/paper-sizes.html
but need a confirm
--
luigi
luigi scarso wrote:
In page-lay.tex
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=320mm,\c!height=450mm]
maybe is wrong.
It should be
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=450mm,\c!height=320mm]
See http://www.theearthpaper.net/paper-sizes.html
but need a confirm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_217
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_217
says the opposite.
Yes, but searching for 'SRA3 450x320 ' give some hits,
and I have two differents blocks of 500 sheets labelled
SRA3 450x320
Why this confusion ?
--
luigi
If your question
Peter Rolf schrieb:
luigi scarso wrote:
In page-lay.tex
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=320mm,\c!height=450mm]
maybe is wrong.
It should be
\definepapersize [SRA3] [\c!width=450mm,\c!height=320mm]
I have found both versions on the net, but as RA* and SRA* are only
scaled
Hi,
this is an interesting discussion. I admit, that I do not have the
ultimate knowledge. Nevertheless I doubt whether the A3 format has to
be considered portrait.
Consider A4 which is portrait because of the grain direction
(Laufrichtung) in the height. Otherwise A3 is two A4 and hence
10 matches
Mail list logo