I updated ConTeXt standalone again and test it.
The result is same as before.
In the log file, it located the font but it issues the luatex error.
The font version is 1.001.
The only difference of the luatex which I can see is that (mine: Standalone,
rev 4972) and (Luigi’s: TeXLive 2014, rev
There may be another problem which I don’t know.
I have tested your source by installing NotoSansCJKkr-Regular.otf etc.
It seems to work OK.
Note that I'm using .otf fonts, not .ttf ones.
I attach cjkkrtest.tar.gz in which there are k.tex and k.pdf.
Best,
Akira
cjkkrtest.tar.gz
Description:
However the resulting PDF shows incorrect characters.
Incorrect characters are in Hirakana and Katakana.
The incorrect Japanese characters are also shown in the case of
SourceHanSans-Regular.otf, the same feature in the
case of NotoSansCJKjp-Regular.otf.
On the other hand, if I use
On 9/27/2014 12:07 PM, Akira Kakuto wrote:
However the resulting PDF shows incorrect characters.
Incorrect characters are in Hirakana and Katakana.
The incorrect Japanese characters are also shown in the case of
SourceHanSans-Regular.otf, the same feature in the
case of
Hi Hans,
... ...
gives the same output here.
You must be testing with the 1.000 fonts.
Yes, version 1.000 fonts worked with the ConTeXt.
Best,
Akira
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 9/27/2014 12:07 PM, Akira Kakuto wrote:
However the resulting PDF shows incorrect characters.
Incorrect characters are in Hirakana and Katakana.
The incorrect Japanese characters are also shown in the case of
On 9/27/2014 12:27 PM, Akira Kakuto wrote:
Hi Hans,
... ...
gives the same output here.
You must be testing with the 1.000 fonts.
Yes, version 1.000 fonts worked with the ConTeXt.
new beta ... it took me quite some tracing and time to figure out that
we can better ignore the Identity
new beta ... it took me quite some tracing and time to figure out that
we can better ignore the Identity cidmap ..
Thank you very much. The PDF is correct now with 1.001 HanSans CJK fonts.
Best regards,
Akira
___
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp
wrote:
new beta ... it took me quite some tracing and time to figure out that we
can better ignore the Identity cidmap ..
Thank you very much. The PDF is correct now with 1.001 HanSans CJK fonts.
At page 98 (of the pdf)
I have tested your source by installing NotoSansCJKkr-Regular.otf etc.
It seems to work OK.
Note that I'm using .otf fonts, not .ttf ones.
I attach cjkkrtest.tar.gz in which there are k.tex and k.pdf.
Your output is perfect.
But I still get an error message which is as same as Luigi
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jeong Dal hak...@me.com wrote:
I have tested your source by installing NotoSansCJKkr-Regular.otf etc.
It seems to work OK.
Note that I'm using .otf fonts, not .ttf ones.
I attach cjkkrtest.tar.gz in which there are k.tex and k.pdf.
Your output is
But I still get an error message which is as same as Luigi mentioned.
Here the TeX Live 2014 version: 0.79.1 (rev 4971) does not work
with the NotoSansCJKkr-Regular.otf.
I'm using the current trunk version: 0.79.1 (rev 5041).
Experimental version (rev 5057) will be better.
Best,
Akira
Dear all,
Recently, I installed “Noto Sans CJK” font which is developed by Adobe and
Google.
After “mtxrun —generate”, luatex locates the font.
For test, I run the following code and got “fatal error:no return code”
message.
Even though I didn’t include Korea test, it says the same error
Recently, I installed “Noto Sans CJK” font which is developed by Adobe and
Google.
After “mtxrun —generate”, luatex locates the font.
For test, I run the following code and got “fatal error:no return code” message. Even though I didn’t include Korea test, it
says the same error message.
In
2014 10:30:51 +0900
From: Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: [NTG-context] about Noto Sans CJK font problem
Message-ID: 2136E6CBAF67499789D6C08EDA3FE859@CJ3001517A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; Format=flowed
Recently, I installed ?Noto Sans CJK
15 matches
Mail list logo
