[NTG-context] lmtx update

2023-02-06 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
Hi, We were considering to drop the virtual math fonts mechanism (which has served its purpose in the transition in the very early days of luatex but became obsolete as math fonts evolved) but in the end we were forced keep this feature and even upgrade it because we liked iwona, kurier and

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-24 Thread Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context wrote: > > > This is the setup I have been using, but I'm unsure if the problem could be > > related to the other problem I had. (Not scaled to a MWE, but short > > enough.) I

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-23 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/23/2021 7:42 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context wrote: This is the setup I have been using, but I'm unsure if the problem could be related to the other problem I had. (Not scaled to a MWE, but short enough.) I figured the issue by removing

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-23 Thread Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021, Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context wrote: > This is the setup I have been using, but I'm unsure if the problem could be > related to the other problem I had. (Not scaled to a MWE, but short enough.) > I figured the issue by removing some of the lines. I get the same

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-23 Thread Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context
This is the setup I have been using, but I'm unsure if the problem could be related to the other problem I had. (Not scaled to a MWE, but short enough.) I figured the issue by removing some of the lines. \usemodule[vim] \definetextbackground[codebkg] [ frame=on,

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2021-08-23 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/23/2021 12:55 AM, Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context wrote: Hi, Here is another thing which worked previously for me: ConTeXt ver: 2021.07.30 00:57 LMTX fmt: 2021.8.8 int: english/english Now: ConTeXt ver: 2021.08.22 11:54 LMTX fmt: 2021.8.22 int: english/english Error: lua

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-23 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/23/2021 12:10 AM, Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context wrote: Hi, Thanks for having had a look into the t-vim. At least the document compiles fine (I get a PDF), although multiple complaints from the lua end when I use "$" or "#" in my source, for example #!/usr/bin/bash etc.

[NTG-context] lmtx update

2021-08-22 Thread Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context
Hi, Here is another thing which worked previously for me: ConTeXt ver: 2021.07.30 00:57 LMTX fmt: 2021.8.8 int: english/english Now: ConTeXt ver: 2021.08.22 11:54 LMTX fmt: 2021.8.22 int: english/english Error: lua error: registered function call [396]:

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-22 Thread Wolfgang Schuster via ntg-context
Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context schrieb am 23.08.2021 um 00:10: Hi, Thanks for having had a look into the t-vim. At least the document compiles fine (I get a PDF), although multiple complaints from the lua end when I use "$" or "#" in my source, for example #!/usr/bin/bash etc.

[NTG-context] lmtx update/t-vim (again)

2021-08-22 Thread Benjamin Buchmuller via ntg-context
Hi, Thanks for having had a look into the t-vim. At least the document compiles fine (I get a PDF), although multiple complaints from the lua end when I use "$" or "#" in my source, for example #!/usr/bin/bash etc. culminating in Sorry, but I'm not programmed to handle this case; I'll

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2021-08-19 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 8/19/2021 10:07 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: Hi, Here are the highlights of todays update: - somewhat more compact tuc files, not for all documents, but it can accumulate; also less memory used then; i could bring down an

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2021-08-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > Hi, > > Here are the highlights of todays update: > > - somewhat more compact tuc files, not for all documents, but it can > accumulate; also less memory used then; i could bring down an extreme > 2000 page 5 column doc tuc file down to

[NTG-context] lmtx update

2021-08-19 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
Hi, Here are the highlights of todays update: - somewhat more compact tuc files, not for all documents, but it can accumulate; also less memory used then; i could bring down an extreme 2000 page 5 column doc tuc file down to 5% -- it was 70 MB; for the luametatex manual it reducec the tuc

[NTG-context] lmtx update: two experimental features

2021-04-18 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I uploaded a new version. There are two new features that are experimental. This time we attempt to deal with the more tricky things and artifacts of the otherwise nice tex machinery we need to get rid of. One can rightfully argue that they are not really issues as one can work around

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/2/2021 11:15 AM, mf wrote: Il 01/03/21 15:44, Hans Hagen ha scritto: \starttext \startuseMPgraphic{circle} lmt_parshape [ path   = fullcircle scaled 136mm, offset = 2mm, bottomskip = - 1.5LineHeight, ] ; \stopuseMPgraphic \start

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/2/2021 11:15 AM, mf wrote: Il 01/03/21 15:44, Hans Hagen ha scritto: \starttext \startuseMPgraphic{circle} lmt_parshape [ path   = fullcircle scaled 136mm, offset = 2mm, bottomskip = - 1.5LineHeight, ] ; \stopuseMPgraphic \start

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-02 Thread mf
Il 01/03/21 15:44, Hans Hagen ha scritto: \starttext \startuseMPgraphic{circle}     lmt_parshape [     path   = fullcircle scaled 136mm,     offset = 2mm,     bottomskip = - 1.5LineHeight,     ] ; \stopuseMPgraphic \start

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-01 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/1/2021 6:27 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thank you for the new upload. The teaser examples work fine, many thanks ! I have a question though: how can one center within a page a text, for example typeset in a circular shape? I tried with \startalignment, and also with

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-01 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thank you for the new upload. The teaser examples work fine, many thanks ! I have a question though: how can one center within a page a text, for example typeset in a circular shape? I tried with \startalignment, and also with \startplacefigure but none of these gives a centered

[NTG-context] lmtx update / teaser

2021-03-01 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I uploaded a new lmtx. As I'm currently going through the metafun todo files I ended up at the fancy shape part (parshapes) running over multiple paragraphs and decided to provide a (kind of low level) interface that integrates that. The example code is a few decades old but still works

[NTG-context] LMTX update 2020.11.17 ----> 11.19 | Paragraph indenting

2020-11-21 Thread Richard Mahoney
Hello, I noticed yesterday that paragraph indenting appears to have changed between LMTX 2020.11.17 & 11.19. Usually the first paragraph after a section heading does not indent, as it does with all subsequent paragraphs. With 11.19 the first paragraph does have an indent. I've had to revert to

Re: [NTG-context] LMTX update 2020.11.17 ----> 11.19 | Paragraph indenting

2020-11-21 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 11/21/20 10:44 PM, Richard Mahoney wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed yesterday that paragraph indenting appears to have changed between > LMTX 2020.11.17 & 11.19. Usually the first paragraph after a section heading > does not indent, as it does with all subsequent paragraphs. With 11.19 > the first

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-17 Thread Eduardo Bohoyo
El 17/9/20 a las 12:50, Eduardo Bohoyo escribió: El 17/9/20 a las 12:35, Wolfgang Schuster escribió: Eduardo Bohoyo schrieb am 17.09.2020 um 10:14: Thank you for this illustrative example, Wolfgang. So, what \forgetparagraphfreezing does is to reverse the order that lmtx currently imposes

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-17 Thread Eduardo Bohoyo
El 17/9/20 a las 12:35, Wolfgang Schuster escribió: Eduardo Bohoyo schrieb am 17.09.2020 um 10:14: Thank you for this illustrative example, Wolfgang. So, what \forgetparagraphfreezing does is to reverse the order that lmtx currently imposes by default, right? In other words,

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Eduardo Bohoyo schrieb am 17.09.2020 um 10:14: Thank you for this illustrative example, Wolfgang. So, what \forgetparagraphfreezing does is to reverse the order that lmtx currently imposes by default, right? In other words, \forgetparagraphfreezing, recovers the default behaviour of MkIV.

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-17 Thread Eduardo Bohoyo
El 17/9/20 a las 1:07, ebohoyod escribió: El 16/9/20 a las 18:23, Wolfgang Schuster escribió: ebohoyod schrieb am 16.09.2020 um 17:52: Hi, It seems that the Lettrine module is one of those affected:

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-16 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
ebohoyod schrieb am 16.09.2020 um 17:52: Hi, It seems that the Lettrine module is one of those affected: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/562534/does-context-fail-in-the-lmtx-environment-with-the-lettrine-module?noredirect=1#comment1418902_562534 But, honestly, first, I don't know

[NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-09-16 Thread ebohoyod
Hi, It seems that the Lettrine module is one of those affected: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/562534/does-context-fail-in-the-lmtx-environment-with-the-lettrine-module?noredirect=1#comment1418902_562534 But, honestly, first, I don't know what means "/Of course it might have other

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-03 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 7/31/20 10:32 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the long mail ... > > One of the changes in lmtx is that we freeze the properties that > determine the paragraph shape as well as breaking into lines in such a > way that we have predictable behaviour. As a side effect it can be that >

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: Thanks for the update. Other work in progress is: better columns in itemize, esp proper footnote support (not that I ever need that but I know users do so ...), experiments work ok, but I need to check spacing. In general, footnotes (will) behave a bit

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hraban, Thank you for reminding me of the solution cooked up by Wolfgang for you a few years ago. That solution works fine when the notes are short enough, but in some cases the notes in the margin bump into each other (indeed it is not a good habit to have long notes, but in some cases one

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
> Am 01.08.2020 um 15:20 schrieb Otared Kavian : > > Regarding footnotes, would it be possible to have a built-in support for > writing the footnotes in the margin? (For instance, assuming that the layout > is such that for instance the right margin takes 1/3 of the page width, then > the

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Otared Kavian
> On 1 Aug 2020, at 16:17, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 8/1/2020 3:20 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: >>> On 31 Jul 2020, at 10:32, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> >>> […] >>> >>> Other work in progress is: better columns in itemize, esp proper footnote >>> support (not that I ever need that but I know users do

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/1/2020 3:20 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: On 31 Jul 2020, at 10:32, Hans Hagen wrote: […] Other work in progress is: better columns in itemize, esp proper footnote support (not that I ever need that but I know users do so ...), experiments work ok, but I need to check spacing. In general,

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-08-01 Thread Otared Kavian
> On 31 Jul 2020, at 10:32, Hans Hagen wrote: > > […] > > Other work in progress is: better columns in itemize, esp proper footnote > support (not that I ever need that but I know users do so ...), experiments > work ok, but I need to check spacing. In general, footnotes (will) behave a >

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-07-31 Thread Hans Hagen
On 7/31/2020 10:40 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hi Hans, On 31 Jul 2020, at 10:32, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, Sorry for the long mail ... One of the changes in lmtx is that we freeze the properties that determine the paragraph shape as well as breaking into lines in such a way that we have

Re: [NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-07-31 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi Hans, > On 31 Jul 2020, at 10:32, Hans Hagen wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for the long mail ... > > One of the changes in lmtx is that we freeze the properties that determine > the paragraph shape as well as breaking into lines in such a way that we have > predictable behaviour. As a side

[NTG-context] lmtx update

2020-07-31 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, Sorry for the long mail ... One of the changes in lmtx is that we freeze the properties that determine the paragraph shape as well as breaking into lines in such a way that we have predictable behaviour. As a side effect it can be that existing code (lmtx only) will behave differently