Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse within combination

based alternative. \starttext \startcollecting % \startcollect \startcombination[3*1] \stopcollect % \dorecurse{3}   {\startcollect    {\externalfigure[dummy]}{}    \stopcollect} % \startcollect \stopcombination \stopcollect % \stopcollecting \stoptext Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse within combination

Am 07.07.22 um 20:52 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context: How can I do this? Sorry for the noise, I solved it with Lua. The cld manual even contains a combinations example. Hraban ___ If your question

[NTG-context] dorecurse within combination

Hi, I’d like to place pages from a multipage PDF in a combination: \startcombination[3*1] \dorecurse{3}{% {\externalfigure[multipage][width=\textwidth/3,page=\recurselevel]}{} } \stopcombination That doesn’t work, because ConTeXt expects a { after \startcombination. (“A left brace

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Dear Aditya, Jairo, Wolfgang, and Otared, Thank you for the replies and explanations. I also read the blog. In this case, using '##1’ is an easy way. For more complex table, I may use luacode. Thanks again. Best regards, Dalyoung

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

\starttabulate[|c|] \dorecurse{9}{\expanded{\NC \recurselevel \NC\NR}} \stoptabulate \stoptext Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context

[NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Hi, I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only in the second example. Does the tabulate cause the error? What

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:42, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: >>> […] > > You gave the same reply 11 years ago :-) which is also listed in the blog > post. … Which shows that some things don't change

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > > > T

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

\dorecurse{8} {\startxrow\startxcell \recurselevel \stopxcell\stopxrow} \stopxtable \stoptext Best regards: Otared K. > On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:07, Jeong Dal wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > There is no error

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 16:35: On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: Hi, I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first example and only two rows are created

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

2020 a la(s) 09:16, Jeong Dal (hak...@me.com) escribió: > Hi, > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the > first example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse{}{} problem

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, Jeong Dal wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make a table using \dorecurse or \doloop as in the example. > There is no error but \recurselevel is not increased, all are 0 in the first > example and only two rows are created with the \recurselevel 0 and 2 only i

Re: [NTG-context] \recursestring undefined when inside \dorecurse

On 6/14/2020 11:41 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \dorecurse{25}{\recurselevel\par} \doloopoverstring{a,b,c}{\recursestring} } \stoptext Both LMTX and MkIV complain about \recursestring for being undefined. I wonder

[NTG-context] \recursestring undefined when inside \dorecurse

Dear list, I have the following sample: \starttext \dorecurse{25}{\recurselevel\par} \doloopoverstring{a,b,c}{\recursestring} } \stoptext Both LMTX and MkIV complain about \recursestring for being undefined. I wonder whether this is inteded or it is a bug. Many thanks

[NTG-context] \beginBLOCKS and \endBLOCKS do not work in \dorecurse

Hi, I cannot make \beginBLOCKS and \endBLOCKS work in a \dorecurse loop. Is it possible? Here is a minimum non working exemple (from https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/defineblock): %% \startdocument \defineblock[question] \hideblocks[question] % We don't want to print blocks where we

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

> On 20 Jan 2017, at 18:00, Rik Kabel wrote: > […] > > Otared, > > I am not sure what you are doing, but if you are using only the code snippet > that Hans posted, you will get a blank page. You have to define the layer and > page background in addition to Hans'

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

ahajan wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should, separately. Please tell m

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

9 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: >> >>> ConTeXters, >>> >>> When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are >>> overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for >>> yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the li

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

On 1/20/2017 8:59 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Rik Kabel wrote: ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should, separately. Please tell me

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse problem

Hi Rik, I can confirm the behaviour you are reporting (even without \startstandardmakeup—\stopstandardmakeup, but adding a line of text in the document in order to have an output). It seems that \dorecurse suppresses the passage to another line, since if one says \dorecurse{10} the texts

[NTG-context] dorecurse problem

ConTeXters, When \dorecurse is active in the following MWE, the lines of text are overprinted. At least, this is the case for me, please confirm it for yourself. When \dorecurse is disabled, the lines print as they should, separately. Please tell me what I am doing wrong

Re: [NTG-context] \startanimation and \dorecurse

) of p;% draw q withcolor red; fill fullcircle scaled 3 shifted point length q of q withcolor blue; setbounds currentpicture to unitsquare shifted (-0.5,-0.5) scaled 75; \stopuseMPgraphic \starttext \startanimation[menu=yes, menucolor=blue, framerate=5] \dorecurse{20} {\expanded{\frame{ \useMPgraphic

Re: [NTG-context] \startanimation and \dorecurse

; N:=20; sn:= \MPvar{s}; q := subpath (0, sn/N*L) of p;% draw q withcolor red; fill fullcircle scaled 3 shifted point length q of q withcolor blue; setbounds currentpicture to unitsquare shifted (-0.5,-0.5) scaled 75; \stopuseMPgraphic \starttext \startanimation \dorecurse{20} {\startexpanded

Re: [NTG-context] \startanimation and \dorecurse

; \stopuseMPgraphic \starttext \startanimation \dorecurse{20} {\startexpanded %\setupMPvariables[Circles][s] \useMPgraphic{Circles}{s=\recurselevel} \stopexpanded} \stopanimation \stoptext %% However, it just draw 20 figures instead of making an animation. Would you please tell

[NTG-context] \startanimation and \dorecurse

\startanimation { \dorecurse{5}{% \setupMPvariables[Circles][s=\recurselevel] \processMPbuffer [Circles] }} \stopanimation \stoptext It seems to me that \startanimation just treat the figures {\dorecurse … } as just one figure. Is there a way to treat it 5 figures to generate animation? Thank

Re: [NTG-context] \startanimation and \dorecurse

; draw fullcircle scaled \MPrawvar{Circles}{s}u; \stopbuffer \starttext \startanimation { \dorecurse{5}{% \setupMPvariables[Circles][s=\recurselevel] \processMPbuffer [Circles] }} \stopanimation \stoptext It seems to me that \startanimation just treat the figures {\dorecurse … } as just

Re: [NTG-context] reset blocks with dorecurse

Is there a way to empty the blocks after each recurse cycle. If i make three exams with the command \dorecurse[3], in the first exam i found the hints and the answers of all exams. I try with the commands \resetnumber[hint, answer], but don't work. begin question-hint-answer-blocks.tex

Re: [NTG-context] reset blocks with dorecurse

Am 15.01.2014 um 15:06 schrieb DesdeChaves desdecha...@gmail.com: Please, can someone provide some assistance in resolving this problem, if possible. I need to prepare a worksheet for Friday and I'm having this problem, ie, each worksheet show the hints and the answers of all worksheets.

Re: [NTG-context] reset blocks with dorecurse

Thank you. Jorge 2014/1/15 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com Am 15.01.2014 um 15:06 schrieb DesdeChaves desdecha...@gmail.com: Please, can someone provide some assistance in resolving this problem, if possible. I need to prepare a worksheet for Friday and I'm having this

[NTG-context] reset blocks with dorecurse

Is there a way to empty the blocks after each recurse cycle. If i make three exams with the command \dorecurse[3], in the first exam i found the hints and the answers of all exams. I try with the commands \resetnumber[hint, answer], but don't work. begin question-hint-answer-blocks.tex

[NTG-context] \dorecurse and \startcombination

Hello, Does anyone have a suggestion how to use \dorecurse within combinations? (without having to use lua...) Alan minimal example: \starttext \startcombination [2] \dorecurse{2}{{#1}{#1}} \stopcombination \stoptext ! Missing { inserted. system tex error on line 3 in file

[NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

Does anyone have a solution to \dorecurse within TABLE? Alan Minimal example: \starttext \dorecurse{8}{\recurselevel\crlf} \bTABLE \dorecurse{8}{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \stoptext ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr wrote: Does anyone have a solution to \dorecurse within TABLE? Alan Minimal example: \starttext \dorecurse{8}{\recurselevel\crlf} \bTABLE \dorecurse{8}{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

2012-10-26 Alan BRASLAU: Does anyone have a solution to \dorecurse within TABLE? Alan Minimal example: \starttext \dorecurse{8}{\recurselevel\crlf} \bTABLE \dorecurse{8}{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR} \dorecurse{8}{\expanded{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR}} \eTABLE \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:27:09 +0200 Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote: \dorecurse{8}{\expanded{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR}} Thank you. And I found something new to understand: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/System_Macros/Expansion_Control Now, is there some better way, or perhaps

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

Am 26.10.2012 um 15:03 schrieb Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr: On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:27:09 +0200 Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote: \dorecurse{8}{\expanded{\bTR\bTD\recurselevel\eTD\eTR}} Thank you. And I found something new to understand: http://wiki.contextgarden.net

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

2012-10-26 Alan BRASLAU: Now, is there some better way, or perhaps not, around creating my own counter (of course, I can use a counter for the column as well...) You can use \currentTABLEcolumn and \currentTABLErow \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{8}{ \bTR \dorecurse{5}{\bTD

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse within TABLE

Helps to read the wiki, with a link to: http://randomdeterminism.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/tex-programming-the-past-the-present-and-the-future/ Simple enough: \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{8}{ \bTR \dorecurse{5}{\bTD \the\numexpr#1,\the\numexpr##1 \eTD} \eTR } \eTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse in table

but that doesn't solve the problem in this case. I would think that the following code is equivalent: \blank \SetTableToWidth{\textwidth} \starttable[|lp(0.90\textwidth)|] Some text \SR \dorecurse{4}{ \SR \HL } \stoptable \blank But it is not. I get

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse in table

Op maandag 6 sep 2010 23:18 CEST schreef Aditya Mahajan: The following code does what I want: \blank \SetTableToWidth{\textwidth} \starttable[|lp(0.90\textwidth)|] Some text \SR \SR \HL \SR \HL \SR \HL \SR \HL \stoptable \blank [CUT] Table and expansion are tricky. The error is

[NTG-context] dorecurse...

Hello, I was busy to build a larger table with a lot of empty but numbered rows. So I thought to use the \dorecurse macro to help me. Now I can't recall the actual value of \recurselevel. Interestingly it fails only when calling for preparing whole rows in the table. When

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse...

Am 21.02.10 11:37, schrieb Willi Egger: Hello, I was busy to build a larger table with a lot of empty but numbered rows. So I thought to use the \dorecurse macro to help me. Now I can't recall the actual value of \recurselevel. Interestingly it fails only when calling for preparing whole

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse...

rows. So I thought to use the \dorecurse macro to help me. Now I can't recall the actual value of \recurselevel. Interestingly it fails only when calling for preparing whole rows in the table. When the \recurselevel is retrieved in normal text it works as expected. Please refer

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse...

Am 21.02.10 17:51, schrieb Willi Egger: Hm, that I see your answer I think I have seen this earlier :-( http://randomdeterminism.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/tex-programming-the-past-the-present-and-the-future/ Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] dorecurse...

No! Even with a comment on my own account ;-( very bad! Thanks Willi On Feb 21, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 21.02.10 17:51, schrieb Willi Egger: Hm, that I see your answer I think I have seen this earlier :-(

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 06.03.2009 um 07:41 schrieb luigi scarso: My summary of this thread: http://randomdeterminism.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/tex-programming-the-past-the-present-and-the-future/ It's exactly what I think . Thank you very much. Nice article, it fits perfectly in the programming section of the

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

%%% TeX version \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \dorecurse{2} {\recurselevel. \recurselevel\crlf} And you think it's a good idea to use \expandafter in your document? TeX version, not context ... :) btw

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Aditya Mahajan adityam at umich.edu writes: My summary of this thread: http://randomdeterminism.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/tex-programming-the-past-the-present-and-the-future/ Aditya I like the Luatex code of Luigi. Though it is longer than what Wolfgang suggested (and in this case, I am

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Do I pick up any beginners book on Lua? There really is only one beginners book on Lua :-) _Programming in Lua_, by Roberto Ierusalimschy, the Lua author. There are a few other books, mostly about Lua and games, because Lua has become quite popular in the gamers' community, but

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

I like the Luatex code of Luigi. Though it is longer than what Wolfgang suggested (and in this case, I am using Wolfgang's solution now that I know about it), the luatex code seems to be the kind of programming that I am more comfortable with. In fact, in Latex when I was trying to achieve

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

\dorecurse{6} {\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel \eTD} \eTR \dorecurse{6} {\bTR \edef\firstrecurselevel{\recurselevel} \expandafter\bTD \recurselevel \eTD \dorecurse{6} {\expandafter \bTD \the\numexpr\firstrecurselevel+\recurselevel\relax \eTD} \eTR} \eTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Arthur and Luigi, thanks for your responses. Arthur, your response makes it very clear, what I need to do. I will start with the book you recommend. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

: You don't need as many \expandafter as you did in your example, one before \bTD in each loop is enough. \bTABLE \bTR \bTD $(+)$ \eTD \dorecurse{6} {\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel \eTD} \eTR \dorecurse{6} {\bTR \edef\firstrecurselevel{\recurselevel} \expandafter\bTD \recurselevel \eTD

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, luigi scarso wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.03.2009 um 01:17 schrieb luigi scarso: \starttext %%% TeX version \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR\expandafter \bTD

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

with the \expandafter before \bTD. \for loop: This does not work, for the same reason that the \dorecurse solution does not work. You need to exapnad \x and \y in the first row and first column. I should next time check the output. Sure, the same rules as \dorecurse apply to the \for loop

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

\dorecurse{5} {\bTR \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD          \bTD \recurselevel  \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \dorecurse{2} {\recurselevel. \recurselevel\crlf} \stoptext works ok here with latest minimals This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.35.0-2009022702 (Web2C 7.5.7) ConTeXt  ver: 2008.11.10 21:40 MKIV  fmt

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 05.03.2009 um 01:17 schrieb luigi scarso: \starttext %%% TeX version \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \dorecurse{2} {\recurselevel. \recurselevel\crlf} And you think it's a good idea to use

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.03.2009 um 01:17 schrieb luigi scarso: \starttext %%% TeX version \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD\expandafter        \bTD \recurselevel  \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

for a normal user, I should keep this in my mind. Are you sure ? What is a normal user ? People who want to use TeX to write a document but copy code from examples, old list messages etc. but don't why they have to do it something like this. As soon as you use \dorecurse , you become

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

People who want to use TeX to write a document but copy code from examples, old list messages etc. but don't why they have to do it something like this. OK, it's hard to write a fancy layout without defining your own header styles etc. without a definition but use then as many high level

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 05.03.2009 um 14:23 schrieb luigi scarso: http://texblog.net/latex-archive/plaintex/expandafter/ hey, this is not a moderate use of expandafter as I intended .. I dropped latex for similar examples . In this situation please, grep setvalue base/* ??? I can't understand the relation

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.03.2009 um 14:23 schrieb luigi scarso: http://texblog.net/latex-archive/plaintex/expandafter/ hey, this is not a moderate use of expandafter as I intended .. I dropped latex for similar examples

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 05.03.2009 um 15:23 schrieb luigi scarso: I prefear \setvalue{quote small}{\quote\small} {\getvalue{quote small} foo } This is non trivial example, normally I would define a new quote command with \definedelimitedtext[quotesmall][quote] but you above code can't be achieved with

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.03.2009 um 15:23 schrieb luigi scarso: I prefear \setvalue{quote small}{\quote\small} {\getvalue{quote small} foo } This is non trivial example, normally I would define a new quote command

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, luigi scarso wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.03.2009 um 01:17 schrieb luigi scarso: \starttext %%% TeX version \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR\expandafter \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD\expandafter        \bTD

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

My summary of this thread: http://randomdeterminism.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/tex-programming-the-past-the-present-and-the-future/ It's exactly what I think . Thank you very much. -- luigi ___ If your question is

[NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Can someone please explain why the second example below works but the first does not work? Thanks very much. \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD \bTD \recurselevel \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \dorecurse{2} {\recurselevel. \recurselevel

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Curious Learn curiousle...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please explain why the second example below works but the first does not work? Thanks very much. \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD          \bTD \recurselevel  \eTD\eTR

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

\dorecurse{5} {\bTR \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD          \bTD \recurselevel  \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \dorecurse{2} {\recurselevel. \recurselevel\crlf} \stoptext works ok here with latest minimals This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.35.0-2009022702 (Web2C 7.5.7) ConTeXt  ver: 2008.11.10 21:40 MKIV  fmt

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 04.03.2009 um 20:35 schrieb Curious Learn: Can someone please explain why the second example below works but the first does not work? Thanks very much. \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR \bTD \recurselevel. \eTD \bTD \recurselevel \eTD\eTR} \eTABLE \bTABLE \dorecurse{5

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes: \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\expanded{\bTD\recurselevel\eTD}\eTR} \eTABLE Wolfgang As your other solutions, this worked great. I suppose I have to use \expanded for every \bTD \eTD pair. Can you please explain why

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 04.03.2009 um 21:57 schrieb Curious Learn: Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes: \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\expanded{\bTD\recurselevel\eTD}\eTR} \eTABLE As your other solutions, this worked great. I suppose I have to use \expanded for every \bTD \eTD pair

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\bTD#1\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE This is evil genious! Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 04.03.2009 um 22:43 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\bTD#1\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE This is evil genious! Can be used nested too. \starttext \bTABLE \dorecurse{5} {\bTR \dorecurse{5}{\bTD#1:##1\eTD} \eTR} \eTABLE

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Not really. \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\bTD#1\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE Wolfgang Awesome How does one learn these things? Is this Tex programming or Context programming. Thanks very much. ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] \dorecurse and \recurselevel in Natural Tables

Am 04.03.2009 um 23:17 schrieb Curious Learn: Not really. \bTABLE \dorecurse{5}{\bTR\bTD#1\eTD\eTR} \eTABLE Wolfgang Awesome How does one learn these things? Follow the mailing list and read parts of the source. Is this Tex programming or Context programming. It's a ConTeXt