Hello,
Thanks Hans and everyone who has worked on it for the new upload!
I have noticed a change which seems to break XML/html export for inline
equations; although I don't know if the issue is with the new version or
with how I'm using it.
Minimal example:
```
\setupbackend[
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\startbuffer[demo]
text
\stopbuffer
\startxmlsetups xml:sample
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{text}{xml:*}
\stopxmlsetups
\xmlregistersetup{xml:sample}
\startxmlsetups xml:text
block: a \xmlverbatim{#1} b\\
inline: a
On 12/4/2023 2:42 PM, Alexandre Christe wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your answer. It helps a lot. Would there be a way to only add
space when inline math is not followed by punctuation, i.e., when inline
math is followed by a space?
A. Christe
Le 4 déc. 2023 à 14:08 +0100, Hans Hagen , a
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your answer. It helps a lot. Would there be a way to only add space
when inline math is not followed by punctuation, i.e., when inline math is
followed by a space?
A. Christe
Le 4 déc. 2023 à 14:08 +0100, Hans Hagen , a écrit :
>
> \setupmathematics[textdistance=.25e
On 12/4/2023 6:43 AM, Alexandre Christe wrote:
Hi,
Here’s a MWE:
\setupinterlinespace[line=3ex]
\definefontfeature[default][default][lnum=yes,tnum=yes]
\usetypescriptfile[alegreya_libertinus]
\setupbodyfont[alegreya-light,ss,10pt]
\setupmathematics[autopunctuation={all}]
% math definitions
\e
ote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I’m facing some strange spacing with inline maths. Sometimes the space
> > is ok (like around the first two fractions), but sometimes it is way too
> > little. Do I miss to configure something?
> your spacing is little between words too
On 12/3/2023 10:31 PM, Alexandre Christe wrote:
Dear list,
I’m facing some strange spacing with inline maths. Sometimes the space
is ok (like around the first two fractions), but sometimes it is way too
little. Do I miss to configure something?
your spacing is little between words too
Dear list,
I’m facing some strange spacing with inline maths. Sometimes the space is ok
(like around the first two fractions), but sometimes it is way too little. Do I
miss to configure something?
Thanks in advance,
A. Christe
On 10/30/2023 8:05 AM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Yes well of course no issue arises if I just change the whole font.
But I wanted to keep using the mono font thus reporting issues with it.
In that case you have to go for flushleft
\setupalign[verytolerant,nothyphenated,flushleft]
because otherwise tex
On 10/29/2023 1:33 PM, Mia Bikey wrote:
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
how about just using this
\setupbodyfont[concrete]
\starttext
When $a, b
Hi,
I was using \setupalign[verytolerant,stretch] so that the mono font does
not go inside the right inline image but after using that command the
inline math seems to spread.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[10pt, mono]
This is how it
Thanks, that works great.
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 7:10 PM Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 10/28/2023 2:25 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> > Am 28.10.23 um 14:17 schrieb Mia Bikey:
> >> Hi,
> >> I was using mono font as my default font but it appears to have issues
> &g
On 10/28/2023 2:25 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 28.10.23 um 14:17 schrieb Mia Bikey:
Hi,
I was using mono font as my default font but it appears to have issues
with right side inline images.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[mono
issues
> > with right side inline images.
> >
> > Here is a Minimal Working Example:
> >
> > ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
> >
> > \setupbodyfont[mono]
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > Image on the right side gets issues.
> > \pla
Am 28.10.23 um 14:17 schrieb Mia Bikey:
Hi,
I was using mono font as my default font but it appears to have issues
with right side inline images.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[mono]
\starttext
Image on the right side gets issues
Hi,
I was using mono font as my default font but it appears to have issues with
right side inline images.
Here is a Minimal Working Example:
ConTeXt ver: 2023.09.26 18:19 LMTX
\setupbodyfont[mono]
\starttext
Image on the right side gets issues.
\placefigure[right]{}{\externalfigure[dummy
On Fri, 19 May 2023, Jeroen via ntg-context wrote:
> Many thanks. Is there a proper way to add some space (a couple of pt or em)
> to the left and the right of the text itself so the frame does not get so
> close to the text?
\framed[loffset=0.2ex, roffset=0.2ex]{...}
Also see: https://wiki.cont
chrieb am 19.05.2023 um 14:22:
> > In order to get some inline framed verbatim text, I have in the past
> > always used the following:
> >
> > \starttext
> >
> > This is an
> > \inframed
> > [frame=on,
> > corner=00,
> > radius=2mm,of
Jeroen via ntg-context schrieb am 19.05.2023 um 14:22:
In order to get some inline framed verbatim text, I have in the past
always used the following:
\starttext
This is an
\inframed
[frame=on,
corner=00,
radius=2mm,offset=-1.5pt]
{\ttx \bf example}
\stoptext
Since this has come-up
In order to get some inline framed verbatim text, I have in the past always
used the following:
\starttext
This is an
\inframed
[frame=on,
corner=00,
radius=2mm,offset=-1.5pt]
{\ttx \bf example}
\stoptext
Since this has come-up more and more often, I created the following:
\define[1
Not a bug, although it may be unexpected. It's a grid snapping thing. Try:
\def\example{%
Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum.
Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum.
Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum.
Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum.
Lorem ipsum. Lorem ipsum. L
Dear Hans and ConTeXt developers,
When you compile the following code with ConTeXt ver: 2021.10.28 10:19, you
will see that:
* in 1-column text the top spacing of the circle is normal,
* in 2-column text, the top spacing of the circle is too large.
Here is the link to the output PDF:
https://live.
On 12/13/2021 6:57 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
which indeed makes
\starttext
\mathematics{$text$}
\stoptext
a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which prevents the $$ lookup.
Indeed, you solved it.
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> which indeed makes
>
> \starttext
> \mathematics{$text$}
> \stoptext
>
> a puzzle
Isn't that effectively:
$\relax$text$\relax$
which prevents the $$ lookup.
Aditya
__
On 12/13/2021 4:35 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
On 13 Dec 2021, at 16:15, Jack Hill via ntg-context wrote:
Dear list,
I was playing around and found that nesting $$s inside of \m blocks typesets
the code as text.
I can't find anything about this on the wiki or in the math-mkiv
> On 13 Dec 2021, at 16:15, Jack Hill via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I was playing around and found that nesting $$s inside of \m blocks typesets
> the code as text.
> I can't find anything about this on the wiki or in the math-mkiv manual, so
> I'm asking whether this is suppo
Dear list,
I was playing around and found that nesting $$s inside of \m blocks
typesets the code as text.
I can't find anything about this on the wiki or in the math-mkiv manual, so
I'm asking whether this is supported behaviour or just a bug?
Jack
\starttext
% All the same
\mathematics{math $te
eems to work up to the point that the text has depth
(descenders). There's a previous post that mentions using textcommand for
titles to ensure that the appropriate baseline is used but I haven't figured
out why that would work; for my purposes, I'm insert the text inline so that
solut
appropriate baseline is used but I haven't figured
out why that would work; for my purposes, I'm insert the text inline so that
solution wouldn't work here. I have included a MWE that demonstrates the
problem; I've tried putting both the text and the outlined text in a box, the
for titles to ensure that the appropriate baseline is used
but I haven't figured out why that would work; for my purposes, I'm
insert the text inline so that solution wouldn't work here. I have
included a MWE that demonstrates the problem; I've tried putting both
the text
used but I haven't figured
out why that would work; for my purposes, I'm insert the text inline so that
solution wouldn't work here. I have included a MWE that demonstrates the
problem; I've tried putting both the text and the outlined text in a box, then
adjusting the outlined
On 1/25/2021 1:58 PM, Johann Birnick wrote:
Recently inline fractions stopped working correctly.
For example symbol spacing, sub-/superscripts, the line is too short,...
You can see the 3 named problems and how they sometimes appear and sometimes not
in this two fractions:
\starttext
$\frac
Recently inline fractions stopped working correctly.
For example symbol spacing, sub-/superscripts, the line is too short,...
You can see the 3 named problems and how they sometimes appear and sometimes not
in this two fractions:
\starttext
$\frac{\sin(x)}{16 \pi \epsilon_0 c^2 m_e^2} \frac
On 12/14/2019 9:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
It seems that the bug which was reported recently is again there: inline math
does not show some symbols (lmtx version 2019.12.12 19:35).
However mkiv version 2019.12.12 19:23 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.12.14 works fine.
Here is a minimal
Hi Hans,
It seems that the bug which was reported recently is again there: inline math
does not show some symbols (lmtx version 2019.12.12 19:35).
However mkiv version 2019.12.12 19:23 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.12.14 works fine.
Here is a minimal example.
\starttext
Let $f(x) := \sum_{n \geq 1}2
The following mwe
\definefontfeature[fraction][frac=yes]
\definehighlight[textfraction][style={\feature[+][fraction]}]
\starttext
a fraction \m{\frac{1}{n}}, \textfraction{1/n}, \vulgarfraction{1}{n} in
the text
\stoptext
works for all but \textfraction in the latest beta (luatex, luametatex).
H
Since it's purely a font issue I did some research on fonts. I found out that \enablemode[lmmath] does the trick (https://www.contextgarden.net/Math_fonts is useful resource). Oh well, everything is fine again and I can keep contexing stuff :) Thank you!
-Eric
__
On 16/05/19 7:46 AM, Eric Scmidt wrote:
> Thank for your efforts to help me. This time I used the exact code snippet
> you
> wrote, but the results for inline math is still not what I would like to have
> since I do see a clear difference in the limits placement. Please see t
Thank for your efforts to help me. This time I used the exact code snippet you wrote, but the results for inline math is still not what I would like to have since I do see a clear difference in the limits placement. Please see this image where I have tried to make more clear what I really want to
}_^{m}
where you are using
\sum\nolimits_{k=1}^{n}
Cheers, Henri
On 11/05/19 7:42 AM, Eric Scmidt wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> So, I have some inline math in my document,and it's looking too big or
> "airy"; a
> bit like when \nolimits is specified in display mode but
Hello everyone!
So, I have some inline math in my document,and it's looking too big or "airy"; a bit like when \nolimits is specified in display mode but smaller. The limits are placed next to the symbol when using for example pdflatex, and I prefer this tight way for inli
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:08, Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote:
I guess it works fine for me on beta 2019.01.07 16:10.
Thanks for testing. Sorry, I should have checked myself.
On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
works her ebut better is probably
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
Quick explanation: I am trying to implement the concept of the HTML tag,
which is supposed to be like a font switch, but doing underlining. I have a
bunch of french clients, and this is a requirement I cannot get around. French
officials _love_ un
> On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:08, Mohammad Hossein Bateni wrote:
>
> I guess it works fine for me on beta 2019.01.07 16:10.
Thanks for testing. Sorry, I should have checked myself.
> On 15 Jan 2019, at 15:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
> works her ebut better is probably:
>
> \definebar[tacobar] [method=1
On 1/15/2019 2:36 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
Quick explanation: I am trying to implement the concept of the HTML tag,
which is supposed to be like a font switch, but doing underlining. I have a
bunch of french clients, and this is a requirement I cannot get around. French
officials _love_ un
I guess it works fine for me on beta 2019.01.07 16:10.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:37 AM Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick explanation: I am trying to implement the concept of the HTML
> tag,
> which is supposed to be like a font switch, but doing underlining. I have
> a
> bunch of french cli
Hi,
Quick explanation: I am trying to implement the concept of the HTML tag,
which is supposed to be like a font switch, but doing underlining. I have a
bunch of french clients, and this is a requirement I cannot get around. French
officials _love_ underlining and uppercasing :(
Because of its
Dear Wolfgang,
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[n,packed][stopper=)]% [stopper=,right=)]
> \item This is a test for the referencing the formula like\par
> \item This is a test for the referencing the formula like\par
> \item This is a test for the referencing the formula like.
> \stopitemize
> \sto
\starttext
\startitemize[n,packed][stopper=)]% [stopper=,right=)]
\item This is a test for the referencing the formula like\par
\item This is a test for the referencing the formula like\par
\item This is a test for the referencing the formula like.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Wolfgang
Jeong Dal schri
Dear Hans,
Thank you for the solution.
It works perfectly.
Have a nice weekend.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
%
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\startitemize[n,text][stopper=,lefttext=,]
\item This is a test for the referencing the formula like\par
\item This is a test for the referenci
On 8/10/2018 8:09 AM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Dear Thomas,
Using your example,
\starttext
\startitemize[n,text]
\startitem
One
\stopitem
\startitem
Two
\stopitem
\stopitemize
\stoptext
I tested the following example and it is working well.
%
\starttext
\startitemize[n,text]
\item This is t
Dear Thomas,
Using your example,
> \starttext
>
> \startitemize[n,text]
> \startitem
> One
> \stopitem
> \startitem
> Two
> \stopitem
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
I tested the following example and it is working well.
%
\starttext
\startitemize[n,text]
\item This is the first sentence.
On 02/28/2018 11:33 AM, Dr. Thomas Möbius wrote:
How to do an in-line / in-text itemization?
I would like to (i) enumerate something (ii) in the text (iii) but I
don't know how.
Thank you!
Thomas
\starttext
\startitemize[n,text]
\startitem
One
\stopitem
\startitem
Two
\stopitem
\stopitemiz
How to do an in-line / in-text itemization?
I would like to (i) enumerate something (ii) in the text (iii) but I
don't know how.
Thank you!
Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add a
On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8/1/2017 9:12 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
>>
>> I’m afraid this isn’t what I was looking for.
>
> i'll make \xmlinlineprettyprinttext but there is where this madness stops
Many thanks for the implementation, Hans.
inline code in XML.
\startbuffer[foo]
foo \bar{crap}
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\typebuffer[foo]
\stoptext
Many thanks for your reply, Hans.
I’m afraid this isn’t what I was looking for.
i'll make \xmlinlineprettyprinttext but there is where this madness stops
As shown in the foll
’t the suppression of line breaks inside, but
>> avoiding the addition of line breaks after and before the typed buffer.
>>
>> I have been reading buff-ver.mkiv, but I’m afraid I cannot contribute
>> such a patch.
>>
>> This is essential to have \xmlprettyprinti
-ver.mkiv, but I’m afraid I cannot contribute
such a patch.
This is essential to have \xmlprettyprintinline and
\xmlprettyprintinlinetext in order to handle inline code in XML.
\startbuffer[foo]
foo \bar{crap}
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\typebuffer[foo]
\stoptext
.
This is essential to have \xmlprettyprintinline and
\xmlprettyprintinlinetext in order to handle inline code in XML.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to
Hans,
many thanks for having added \xmlprettyprinttext to ConTeXt.
I have now another problem with inline code:
\definetype[TeX][option=TEX, lines=hyphenated]
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=1em]
This is inline code: \TeX{\command[option=value]{final text}}
\startXML
Inline code: \TeX[option
The following was in answer to 3/11/2017 4:52 PM, Pavneet Arora:
On 13 Mar 2017, at 00:27, Hans Hagen mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>>
wrote:
\starttext
\start
\definefont[whatever][Sans at 50pt]
\dontleavehmode\inframed
[foregroundstyle=whatever,
frame=off,
On 3/11/2017 4:52 PM, Pavneet Arora wrote:
Really simple problem that has had me bashing my head for a while, so I
thought that I would reach out and ask for help:
I need to create large type title/sub-title combinations in-line. I
need the sub-titles to be stacked so that they share the same b
Really simple problem that has had me bashing my head for a while, so I
thought that I would reach out and ask for help:
I need to create large type title/sub-title combinations in-line. I
need the sub-titles to be stacked so that they share the same baseline
as the title. Unfortunately, I ca
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
> can ConTeXt handle base64 encoded inline images, and how?
>
> I'm trying to process some HTML files that contain those. Makes not a lot of
> sense, but if ConTeXt can handle them, I don’t need to e
Hi,
can ConTeXt handle base64 encoded inline images, and how?
I'm trying to process some HTML files that contain those. Makes not a lot of
sense, but if ConTeXt can handle them, I don’t need to extract them as files.
Greetlings, Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
Lovely, thanks Wolfgang! (Wish I knew how to find such things on my
own.) Cheers -- Thomas
Am 22.06.2016 um 15:45 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Thomas Fehige <mailto:tho...@fehige.de>
22. Juni 2016 um 14:34
Is there a clean and easy way in mkiv to create text inline fractions
with a
Thomas Fehige <mailto:tho...@fehige.de>
22. Juni 2016 um 14:34
Is there a clean and easy way in mkiv to create text inline fractions
with a slash; something like 1{}^1/_2 to mean one and a half?
\definefontfeature[fraction][frac=yes]
\definehighlight[textfraction][style={\feature[+][fr
Is there a clean and easy way in mkiv to create text inline fractions
with a slash; something like 1{}^1/_2 to mean one and a half?
Thank you -- Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
On 2/18/2016 9:37 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 18 February 2016 at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
On Mac (TextMate, but I assume other editors would behave the same)
the system proba
On 18 February 2016 at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
> unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
On Mac (TextMate, but I assume other editors would behave the same)
the system probably does some character substitution, so as
On 2016-02-18, at 10:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
> this brings up the question: would users (here) start using real math
> unicode input if we had a monospace math font?
FWIW, you can have Emacs automatically display ∫ in place of \int
etc. in your file (and this is no real substitution, just for vi
On 18 Feb 2016, at 10:16, Hans Hagen mailto:pra...@wxs.nl>>
wrote:
also, DEK used a keyboard with some special characters (probably dating from
those assembler like computer languages) which is why the plain tex format has:
Could it have been a keyboard especially for the APL language? Just a
On 2/18/2016 1:38 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:40:39 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Excuse me, Alan, this is exclamation in Spanish (and only in Spanish).
Bigre ! Of course, I know that.
Just out of curiosity, why do you think he should have chosen that?
I was attempting
On 2/18/2016 12:40 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/17/2016 11:18 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:08:31 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote:
you're an american citizen who likes $x^2$ but to call if
beautiful ... €x^2€ nor £x^2£ (in 8 bit encodings / local keyboards
times) all look bad ...
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:40:39 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Excuse me, Alan, this is exclamation in Spanish (and only in Spanish).
Bigre ! Of course, I know that.
> Just out of curiosity, why do you think he should have chosen that?
I was attempting to make some fun with this thread.
More ser
On 02/17/2016 11:18 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:08:31 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> you're an american citizen who likes $x^2$ but to call if
>> beautiful ... €x^2€ nor £x^2£ (in 8 bit encodings / local keyboards
>> times) all look bad ...
>
> Hans, you forgot: ¥x^2¥, ₽x^2₽,
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:24:53 -0500
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> I am curious to know if there is ANYONE who types in a lot of math
> and regularly uses \m{...} or \math{...}. I still use $$ and use
> \math{..} or \mathematics{...} only when generating output from lua
> code: context.math("") e
I use $…$. And for copying text from one TeX to another (e.g. ConTeXt <—>
PlainTex/Latex/Markdown/Jax), it would be a pain if I couldn't.
Michael
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
>
>> However, I can see situations where one might
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
However, I can see situations where one might want to tighten spacing
in order to fit a particular expression within a line or in a table,
for example. Here, \math[options]{expression} is a reasonable syntax,
yet I cannot foresee ever using the very crypt
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:44:43 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> also, but don't tell alan, there is this:
>
> \m[i:tight]{}
>
> i:default, i:tight, i:half, i:fixed
I spy...
I would suggest that one would set (inline) math spacing and other
options (like \mathscriptsmode) glo
On 2/17/2016 8:31 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
I agree totally with Alan in saying that the inline math signals $\cdots$
should NEVER be left out from ConTeXt, or even become deprecated.
that was never the intention (as one can always run in asciimode) but
what's being discussed here is
I agree totally with Alan in saying that the inline math signals $\cdots$
should NEVER be left out from ConTeXt, or even become deprecated.
Indeed many people move mathematical texts from one file to another one, in
order to be able to typeset or print it either with ConTeXt, or other
macro
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:59:58 +0100
Marco Patzer wrote:
> > What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
> > Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
> > math should appear rather as displayed math.
>
> While I agree on tha
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:20:04 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 4:59 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
> > Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> >
> >> I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor
> >> and has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Marco Patzer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:21:42 -0700
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
I do note that the VIM syntax highlighting routine is pretty poor and
has difficulties around $, which is a symbol that I like using
(unpaired) quite a lot in MetaPost (\startMPcode...\stopMPcode).
ting that I use here (mixed tex / mp / lua mode)
What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
math should appear rather as displayed math.
While I agree on that one, writing \math{x^2} clearly states what it
is
On 2/16/2016 4:21 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
Clearly, an equation to which one might want to have a reference
math should appear rather as displayed math.\def\m#1{\startimath
you being a mathematics-physics-chemistry mixed mode
that he's not maintaining
the syntax files any longer and if I want to take over
maintainership. I declined because I know I wouldn't have much time
at my disposal the next months.
> What sort of needs for structure could \m address for inline math?
> Clearly, an equation to which one might w
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:54:25 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 9:22 AM, Nicola wrote:
> > I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
> > for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
> > variants. Is that really the case? If s
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:22:23 +0100
Nicola wrote:
> I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
> for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
> variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
> what are the differences?
Whe
On 2/16/2016 9:22 AM, Nicola wrote:
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
what are the differences?
that page probably needs updating
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math) that $…$
for inline math is deprecated in favor of \m{…} and more verbose
variants. Is that really the case? If so, what is the reason and
what are the differences?
Nicola
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:30:46 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 2/28/2015 2:00 PM, Christoph Reller wrote:
>
> > Dear Hans,
> >
> > Can you please add the above patch, or is there a particular reason
> > for not
> > doing so?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Christoph
>
> I'll a
On 2/28/2015 2:00 PM, Christoph Reller wrote:
Dear Hans,
Can you please add the above patch, or is there a particular reason
for not
doing so?
Kind regards,
Christoph
I'll add it but there will only be a new beta when Alan and I are
satisfied about the publication s
On Wed, Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:03:27 +0100, wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 16:30:13 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster <
> schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Am 17.02.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Christoph Reller <
> > christoph.rel...@gmail.com>:
> > &
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 16:30:13 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster <
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am 17.02.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Christoph Reller <
> christoph.rel...@gmail.com>:
> > How do I escape to TeX from inside an inline typing command? It works
> fine from
> Am 17.02.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Christoph Reller :
>
> Hi,
>
> How do I escape to TeX from inside an inline typing command? It works fine
> from a typing environment.
>
> MWE:
>
> \setuptyping[TEX][escape={[[,]]}]
> \definetype[typeTEX][option=TEX]
> \st
Hi,
How do I escape to TeX from inside an inline typing command? It works fine
from a typing environment.
MWE:
\setuptyping[TEX][escape={[[,]]}]
\definetype[typeTEX][option=TEX]
\starttext
\startTEX
\I\can [[\em escape]]
\stopTEX
\typeTEX{\I\cannot [[\em escape]]}
\stoptext
Thank you for any
#x27;s an example:
>
> *** traditional (stacked) footnotes ***
> ***
>
> 1. This is the text of the first footnote
> 2. This is the text of the second footnote
>
>
> *** inline footnotes (one paragraph for all the footnotes) ***
&
**
1. This is the text of the first footnote
2. This is the text of the second footnote
*** inline footnotes (one paragraph for all the footnotes) ***
**
1. first footnote --- 2. second footnote --- 3. the third
footnote,
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo