Christian (UB)
Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users ; Bruce Horrocks
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Contractions in ligature suppression word list
Here's a short example (version 2022.05.11 11:36):
\setuplanguage[en][goodies={lang-en.llg}]
\starttext
% Expected: no ligature; actual: as expected
wolfish
Here's a short example (version 2022.05.11 11:36):
\setuplanguage[en][goodies={lang-en.llg}]
\starttext
% Expected: no ligature; actual: as expected
wolfish
% Expected: no ligatures; actual: ligature
wolfing
wolfin'
wolfin’
\stoptext
-context] Contractions in ligature suppression word list
Thanks for the response, Bruce.
1) The file you attached doesn't include the word "wolfing", nor "wolfin". I
assume they need to be
The suffixes section accounts for this. Wolfing and wolfish both suppress the
li
Thanks for the response, Bruce.
1) The file you attached doesn't include the word "wolfing", nor "wolfin".
> I assume they need to be
The suffixes section accounts for this. Wolfing and wolfish both suppress
the ligature correctly.
I removed the comma separators, good catch. No difference,
> On 6 Jun 2022, at 06:37, Thangalin via ntg-context wrote:
>
> Attached are tweaked endings for words like "wolf" to include contracted
> endings, but they are being ignored. This makes for a minor inconsistency:
>
> wolfing -- no ligature
> wolfish -- no ligature
> wolfin -- no
Attached are tweaked endings for words like "wolf" to include contracted
endings, but they are being ignored. This makes for a minor inconsistency:
wolfing -- no ligature
wolfish -- no ligature
wolfin -- no ligature (incorrect spelling, though)
wolfin' -- ligature
Any ideas? I tried
