Re: [NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working

2022-05-24 Thread Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:35 AM Luis Montgomery via ntg-context
 wrote:
>
> Same issue with
>
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \startalign[number=auto]
> \NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+]
> \NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+]
> \stopalign
> \stopformula
>
>
> and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment 
> (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).
>
> L. Montgomery
>
> El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context 
> () escribió:
>>
>> On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
>> >
>> > I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
>> > there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside
>> > mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if
>> > multiple are requested.
>> >
>> > The following example does not produce the expected result
>> > both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
>> >
>> >   \starttext
>> >
>> >   \placeformula
>> >   \startformula
>> > \startmathalignment
>> >   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>> >   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
>> > \stopmathalignment
>> >   \stopformula
>> >
>> >   \stoptext
>> >
>> > Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work
>> > as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
>> > [...]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any
>> workaround for the issue  I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I
>> unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am
>> stuck with documents without equation numbers.
>>
>> As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first
>> equation is numbered (while both should be)
>>
>>   \placeformula
>>   \startformula
>> \startmathalignment
>>   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>>   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
>> \stopmathalignment
>>   \stopformula
>> I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Sreeram
>>
>>   Sreeram
>>

It has been fixed, but we have to wait for the next upload.

/Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working

2022-05-24 Thread Luis Montgomery via ntg-context
Same issue with

\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[number=auto]
\NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+]
\NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula


and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).

L. Montgomery

El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context ()
escribió:

> On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
> >
> > I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
>
> > there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside
>
> > mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even
> if
> > multiple are requested.
> >
> > The following example does not produce the expected result
> > both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
> >
> >   \starttext
> >
> >   \placeformula
> >   \startformula
> > \startmathalignment
> >   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
> >   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> > \stopmathalignment
> >   \stopformula
> >
> >   \stoptext
> >
> > Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not
> work
> > as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
> > [...]
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has
> any
> workaround for the issue  I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I
> unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I
> am
> stuck with documents without equation numbers.
>
> As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first
> equation is numbered (while both should be)
>
>   \placeformula
>   \startformula
> \startmathalignment
>   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> \stopmathalignment
>   \stopformula
> I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
>
> Thanks,
>   Sreeram
>
>   Sreeram
>
>
>
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___
>
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working

2022-05-21 Thread śrīrāma via ntg-context
On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
> 
> I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or 
> there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside  
> mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if 
> multiple are requested.
> 
> The following example does not produce the expected result
> both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
> 
>   \starttext
> 
>   \placeformula
>   \startformula
> \startmathalignment
>   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> \stopmathalignment
>   \stopformula
> 
>   \stoptext
> 
> Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work  
> as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
> [...]

Hi,

Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any 
workaround for the issue  I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I 
unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am 
stuck with documents without equation numbers.

As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first 
equation is numbered (while both should be)

  \placeformula
  \startformula
\startmathalignment
  \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
  \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
\stopmathalignment
  \stopformula
I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.

Thanks,
  Sreeram

  Sreeram


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working

2022-05-19 Thread Luis Montgomery via ntg-context
It's true. In the version that comes with TeXlive 2021 (2021.03.05)
this numbering works fine, but not with the 2022.05.11.

L. Montgomery


El jue, 19 may 2022 a las 3:34, śrīrāma via ntg-context ()
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
>
> I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
> there
> is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside mathalignment
> blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if multiple are
> requested.
>
> The following example does not produce the expected result (sample
> attached):
> both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
>
>   \starttext
>
>   \placeformula
>   \startformula
> \startmathalignment
>   \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>   \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> \stopmathalignment
>   \stopformula
>
>   \stoptext
>
> Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work
> as
> expected. Has its behaviour changed?
>
> I ran into this when I compiled a large maths-heavy document and while
> proof-
> reading noticed numerous missing references to statements inside
> mathalignment. Please advise me on how I might fix/workaround this.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sreeram___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___
>
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___