Re: [NTSysADM] feedback

2014-01-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
:) *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for the SMB market…* On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Steward jstew...@gmail.com wrote: :) It won't be much longer and this link will be older

RE: [NTSysADM] feedback

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
I have that link on my Contact Me page on my site. I no longer even respond to the emails that say something like: My users are having issue with my XenApp. Can you please tell me troubleshooting steps? Sheez Webster From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [NTSysADM] event 129 on 2012 hyper-V guest

2014-01-08 Thread J- P
24GB RAM and 4 vCPUs has nothing to do with disk I/O – it’s still the same amount of read/write requests going to the disk. Did i mention we went from 7200k sata in a mirror to 15 SAS on a raid 10 with 6 disk, and it not like my users hit it with anything other than excel/word/ppt and

[NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
I am not Cisco person or a packet head. How do I find what the most current 12.x Cisco ios version available is? At a customer site where we are having an issue with a Citrix product that says a bug is fixed in ios 12.3 or later. Obviously I can't tell an enterprise to update the ios on a

Re: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Sean Martin
This might help convey the age of their current rev level http://www.cisco.com/web/software/SPRIT/swretirement/IOSRetirementTable.html On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: I am not Cisco person or a packet head. How do I find what the most current

Re: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread tkroll
It's old, really old. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6969/ps1835/prod_bulletin0900aecd801eda8a_ps6350_Products_Bulletin.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6947/ps5187/prod_end-of-life_notice0900aecd8052e110.html Tom Kroll Hinshaw

RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
No one here on the customer's Citrix or WinTel team know anything about the networking stuff and (obviously) have no access to any of that equipment. So no one here knows what ios version is in use. They could have they most current version. All I know is the CTX article says this bug is an

RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
They are using Nexus switches with version 6.2 of whatever the ios equivalent is. We have run a Wireshark trace and it looks like the Bluecat DHCP appliance is not issueing DHCP Option 66. It is handing out Option 67. A quick Google search turned up a Lucatel issue where the VoIP phones were

Re: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Don Ely
If they are running Nexus switches, that isn't IOS anymore. It's NX-OS... If you can ssh into the equipment, a sh ver will tell you what version you're on. For reference, IOS is all the way up to 15.x these days... On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote: They

RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
I was told the original issue was specific to ios and doesn't apply to Nexus. What we have found via Wireshark is that their Bluecat DHCP/DNS appliance is not offering Option 60. This is now back on their team that handles the Bluecat appliances. Thanks Webster From:

RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Webster
Apparently this is a known issue on the Bluecat appliances. They made a configuration change and now Option 66 and 67 work like a charm. Bluecat doesn't use Options 66 or 67 but they have their own options that work like 66 and 67. Once those options were set, our Citrix stuff is now

RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Kennedy, Jim
Nice, you fixed it and laid blame on the network guys at the same time. Well done Webster. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Webster Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:26 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cisco

[NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
Computer Group Policy from 2008 R2 SP1 fails when applied to XP SP3 using Global security groups. Windows 7 workstations in the same security group process the computer policy fine. If I add the XP workstations manually to Security Filtering they work fine. What am I missing?   Thanks.  

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Rankin, James R
The Client-Side Extensions hotfix is what you need Sent from my (new!) BlackBerry, which may make me an antiques dealer, but it's reliable as hell for email delivery :-) -Original Message- From: Steve Norton chipsh...@comcast.net Sender: listsadmin@lists.myitforum.comDate: Wed, 8 Jan

Re: [NTSysADM] Cisco ios version

2014-01-08 Thread Andrew S. Baker
LOL *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker *Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for the SMB market…* On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Kennedy, Jim kennedy...@elyriaschools.orgwrote: Nice, you fixed it and laid blame on the

RE: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Aakash Shah
Are the global groups being used inside Group Policy Preferences, or in the Security Filtering section of GP? If you are using the Security Filtering in GP, then the CSEs should not apply here afaik. Personally, I try to avoid using groups with computers in them since new computers do not

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
Windows-KB943729-x86-ENU has already been installed. Thanks. Steve - Original Message - From: James R Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:00:49 PM Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP The

Re: [NTSysADM] RE: Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
We're about 75% done with a migration to Windows 7 and should have it wrapped up before XP end of life. Thanks. Steve - Original Message - From: John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:05:27 PM Subject: [NTSysADM] RE:

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
Global groups are being used in the security filtering section of GP and have security permissions to read and apply GP. Thanks. Steve - Original Message - From: Aakash Shah aakash.s...@uci.edu To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:12:49 PM Subject:

RE: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Aakash Shah
In addition, does the gpresult show that the XP computer is a member of the security group in question (from the The computer is a part of the following security groups section of the gpresult output). -Aakash Shah From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
GPOs show not being applied in gpresult. Also the XP machines do not show as being part of the security group in gpresult but the Windows 7 do. RSOP show no computer settings applied. Group Policy shows Inaccessible in Group Policy Results. Also when I add the computer to the Global Security

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
It does not but the Windows 7 machines do. Steve From: "Aakash Shah" aakash.s...@uci.eduTo: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.comSent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 2:45:16 PMSubject: RE: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP In addition, does the gpresult show that the XP computer is a

RE: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Aakash Shah
I was going to indicate that it’s having a problem getting policies, but since it is working when you add the computer directly to the GP, that is odd. Is disjoining and rejoining the domain an option? If so, please try that. I would consider disjoining AD, deleting the computer from AD,

RE: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Charles Sullivan
Did you reboot the XP machines after adding them to the group? For machines you need a reboot. Just like when you add a user to a group, that user needs to log out before the membership takes place. Charlie Sullivan Sr. Windows Systems Administrator From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

PSS- blah RE: [NTSysADM] event 129 on 2012 hyper-V guest

2014-01-08 Thread J- P
So I am on the phone with PSS and they are trying to tell me (after checking all updates etcc) you should change it to IDE I said to them if i want to band-aid the issue I wouldn't have ponied up the 269.00 MS Reply umm please hold while I confer with colleagues

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Christopher Bodnar
What does the forest hierarchy look like? Any trusts here? Are any of the XP machines showing global security group membership in any other groups? Or don't they show membership in any global groups? How many machines exhibit this behavior? When did it start? Christopher Bodnar Enterprise

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
On my test unit I can disjoin and rejoin the domain and take the steps you indicated but to do that to all the remaining XP machines would not be feasible. This whole thing started when I attempted to move WSUS away from the Default Domain Policy which has the default Authenticated Users Security

RE: PSS- blah RE: [NTSysADM] event 129 on 2012 hyper-V guest

2014-01-08 Thread Ken Schaefer
If they don't have a fix available yet, then a temporary workaround that solves the issue may be worth implementing -- http://au.linkedin.com/in/kschaefer Typed on a Lenovo Helix - apologies for brevity From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf

Re: [NTSysADM] Computer Group Policy not applied to XP

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Norton
I did not reboot the XP workstation. I've just been flipping gpupdate /force and gpresult or rsop. I will try that in the morning. Thanks. Steve - Original Message - From: Charles Sullivan charles.sulliva...@bc.edu To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014