And now a narrative on the hijacking of the hijacking...
-sc
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:58 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Question on those working with
2 days, and its still going. This is why we cant have nice things.
--
Espi
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
And now a narrative on the hijacking of the hijacking...
-sc
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
My guess is that you're still going to have problems P2Ving the machine
once it's a member server, but there's no reason not to try.
We used to use the VMware Converter twice weekly to P2V a DC as a disaster
recovery measure. I was able to do a test recovery of it multiple times.
(I'm not
I have a customer that has a single Win2003 DC running. At one point we added
another DC and put in a 2008 Server. The schema on the 2003DC was upgraded to
V47 with Adprep then the 2008 server setup as the 2nd DC.
There was an issue with another application on this 2008 box and we had to
You will have no issues as you can't raise the Domain Function Level to
anything higher than 2003. So adding an additional 2003 DC should pose no
issues.
Webster
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf
of Dave
No problems.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Vantine
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:23 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Win 2003 DC
I have a customer that has a single Win2003 DC
My guess, and it's only a guess, is that you'll be fine. You won't be able
to change the DFL or FFL until all 2003 DCs are gone, but I would think you
can add as many 2003 DCs as you want until that time. I'm sure smarter
folks will chime in and either verify, or tell me to go back to my little
If the only DC is 2003, that means the DFL/FFL is at most 2003, so adding
another 2003 DC is fine. You will have no issues.
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess Place,
I looked at this yesterday and it is actually DFL/FFL 2000. This was is and
inherited environment I am still trying to sort out.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Christopher Bodnar
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:32 AM
To:
Thanks to everyone who responded
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Vantine
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 10:41 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Win 2003 DC
I looked at this yesterday and it is actually
Below my name are the headers from an email to the list. It's all very
interesting, but note the following lines:
Thread-Topic: [NTSysADM] Question on those working with SEIM
Thread-Index: AQHPVQqiXmMi1lMNLEKRfD3qDBILIpsMfHog
Message-ID: -1938824978_263427...@myitforum01.orcsweb.com
References:
I've got a 1U Cisco router I use courtesy of ebay - it's been working for many
years in the corner. Keep in mind when you buy commercial gear, the support
cost goes way up, and when it breaks and you're not home, it's not exactly end
user serviceable as the label says. Running a full linux box
Not sure I understand the question. Are you asking what the expected
replication latency is? Perhaps you could describe the topology in a bit more
detail.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From:
On 8 Apr 2014 at 16:58, Ken Cornetet wrote:
I'm rather partial to pfsense. I'm running it on an old AMD pc that I snagged
from the
trash. No hard drive required - it boots from a 2GB USB fob.
Yep, and it has already been patched to fix the
HeartBleed bug. Doubt if many consumer home
I like the buffalo hardware (which comes with a version of ddwrt) and then
flashing it with the current version of ddwrt. For home and very-small-business.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 7:51
I gave up and dropped the coin for a Sonicwall TZ205 at home. I tried the
free Astaro offering for a while, as well as ddwrt, but I didn't like
either of them. I'm so used to the full feature set at work, that I became
very frustrated when I didn't have it at home. In hindsight, I think it
was
What are people looking for in a home router?
I'm assuming it's something in a feature set not provided by the router
supplied by your broadband ISP?
Wireless? Multiple interfaces? FW Capability? VPN endpoint?
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
For me it was every single one of those, plus gateway AV, highly
configurable packet capture[1], and robust logging/reporting.
[1] The free Astaro fw had everything[2] but packet cap, which is
occasionally required for troubleshooting.
[2] The WiFi AP was most definitely not free. Anyone need a
Gotcha.
I'm using an OpenBSD box for those tasks, and Meraki Buffalo/DD-WRT devices
as AP's.
In addition it's a reverse proxy-cache.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Richard Stovall [rich...@gmail.com]
Received: Friday, 11 Apr 2014, 11:15PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
I do have a Meraki AP as well for the 3rd floor. Darn nice of 'em to give
it to me.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
Gotcha.
I'm using an OpenBSD box for those tasks, and Meraki Buffalo/DD-WRT
devices as AP's.
In addition it's a reverse
At least until the license expires then it is bricked unless you want to keep
paying them. It is nice though. I kind of wish it was not so expensive it
would be great in the home market, well at least if I was selling and setting
them up it would be. Most, if not all, home owners want
On 11 Apr 2014 at 23:06, Steven M. Caesare wrote:
What are people looking for in a home router?
For me, security among other things...
I'm assuming it's something in a feature set not provided by the router
supplied by your broadband ISP?
Do you trust your ISP not to snoop on you?
Agreed. I like the feature set in the Meraki's but I dislike their licensing
to some degree. I know they need to do it but question why they need to brick
the unit if the person purchasing it has paid for it. Being able to see what
the family is looking at, Facebook, general surfing, email,
23 matches
Mail list logo
