Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-29 Thread Jean-Christian Chevalier
QNAP appliances can be integrated in AD and it works well. You basically add it to your domain as you would a Windows PC. Then you can set up permissions for the shares you define on the NAS using AD groups and/or users. I have one in use at a small business since 2 years (model TS-459U-SP+).

RE: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-29 Thread N Parr
I have a TS-659 Pro II home and at work. I've used them for SMB (AD authentication) and ISCSI targets. I just moved iSCSI off the one at work now that we have another EQ. It's mainly used as a backup target now and for any kind of bulk storage users need. I still use the one at home for my

RE: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-29 Thread Sam Cayze
Can it also act as a DFS share? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Christian Chevalier Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:05 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?) QNAP appliances can

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-29 Thread Jean-Christian Chevalier
] *On Behalf Of *Jean-Christian Chevalier *Sent:* Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:05 AM *To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com *Subject:* Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?) QNAP appliances can be integrated in AD and it works well. You basically add it to your domain as you would a Windows PC

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Don Kuhlman
I can share a SHORT VERSION of experience from the last gig - we used them mostly with MACs for exactly what you're talking about - backups(timemachine), some file storage, shares. Since it was mostly MACs I don't know if that helps you, there were some Windows clients too. In the few months I

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Don Kuhlman drkuhl...@yahoo.com wrote: Sorry, I know that's not helpful, but I can at least say I didn't have any bad experience with them overall... Hey, from what I've seen of the cheap NAS space, Didn't burst into flame is useful feedback... Thanks.

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Don Kuhlman
Sure thing - If memory serves, I think we had about 300 users hitting it at different times. Plus we did use AD auth from all the clients... Don K On Mon, 10/28/13, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Richard Stovall
I have two QNAP devices at $Work. One is dedicated as a B2D target for BackupExec and is doing essentially what you're talking about. It leverages AD for share permissions, and hasn't so much as burped since I set it up a couple of years ago. Another nice feature is that it 'just works' with

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: No experience with the QNAP, but here's what I'd do. Get a refurb Dell server and stuff it full of disks. Put FreeNAS on it. Done. Apparently you missed this part: But management here is concerned that good Linux

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: No experience with the QNAP, but here's what I'd do. Get a refurb Dell server and stuff it full of disks. Put FreeNAS on it. Done. Apparently

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Heck, if you want, they'll even sell you a commercial appliance that does the same thing, and the pricing isn't unreasonable.. http://www.ixsystems.com/storage/ix/home-office-storage/freenas-mini.html Doesn't look like a

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Sean Martin
Perhaps your minions don't have the necessary experience because they haven't been given the opportunity. Sounds like your initial gut decision to go with a home grown solution would provide more than one benefit. - Sean On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Heck, if you want, they'll even sell you a commercial appliance that does the same thing, and the pricing isn't unreasonable..

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Kurt Buff
I wasn't going to go there, because I've been in the same boat. Management is often shy Open Source stuff. I don't know what it is, but I've seen it enough to know that opening up for Open Source is not something management does very often, or willingly. It's a shame, really, as it does several

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Scott
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps your minions ... On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: I wasn't going to go there ... http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3318/3251058133_44de524524_z.jpg -- Ben

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Sean Martin seanmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps your minions ... On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: I wasn't going to go there ...

Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)

2013-10-28 Thread Matthew W. Ross
that in mind. Open source software does not have this problem. - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Sent: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:14:32 -0800 Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?) I wasn't going to go there, because I've been