Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-19 Thread James M. Pulver
ilto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:20 PM To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights Ah. I first configured DirectAccess with 2008R2 and UAG 2010, and have since migrated to 2012 R2

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-19 Thread James Rankin
: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights OK, so let's try running this around the defensive ends. :) Instead of letting the CMAK profile update the route table with it's normal cmroute.dll method, I can manually update the routes with post-connect tasks, etc. The logic is straightforward

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-19 Thread Melvin Backus
e- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:20 PM > To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights > > Ah.

Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-18 Thread Kurt Buff
com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:20 PM > To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights > > Ah. I first configured DirectAccess with 2008R2 and

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-18 Thread Melvin Backus
don't. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:20 PM To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights Ah. I

Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-18 Thread Kurt Buff
ho understand binary and those who don't. > > > -Original Message- > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] > On Behalf Of Kurt Buff > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:00 PM > To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> > Su

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-18 Thread Melvin Backus
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 7:00 PM To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights URA? I do not know this term. However, it looks like it might be related to Direct

RE: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-13 Thread Melvin Backus
. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of James M. Pulver Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:00 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights If the problem

Re: [NTSysADM] RE: CMAK profiles without admin rights

2016-10-13 Thread James M. Pulver
If the problem is the routes don't get published, you can put Users in Network Configurator Operators group, and turn off UAC, and then normal users can update their route maps. James Pulver CLASSE Computer Group Cornell University On 10/13/2016 07:46 AM, Melvin Backus wrote: Budget for this