Gee, an outdated doc? J
That could still be a published requirement but I’m not sure what functional
difference there would be. Our SQL 2014 cluster is running on Std. I didn’t
set it up but I know we had to use Enterprise on our Exchange servers running
2008r2, and that was one of the
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Mayo, Bill wrote:
> I haven't done it since Windows 2008 R2, but Microsoft clustering does work
> in a vSphere environment if you have the shared storage (sounds like you do).
I had MS clustering working on SQL 2008 R2 running on 2
Wouldn't never! Musta been someone else...
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Webster wrote:
> You talking about me? [image: ]
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> Carl Webster
>
> Citrix Technology Professional | iGel Tech Community Insider | Parallels
> VIPP
>
>
Someone ought to hire whoever wrote that article - it's very nice.
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Webster wrote:
> http://carlwebster.com/implementing-microsoft-sql-
> server-2016-standard-basic-availability-groups-use-
> citrix-xenapp-xendesktop-7-9/
>
>
>
>
You talking about me?
Thanks
Carl Webster
Citrix Technology Professional | iGel Tech Community Insider | Parallels VIPP
http://carlwebster.com/implementing-microsoft-sql-server-2016-standard-basic-availability-groups-use-citrix-xenapp-xendesktop-7-9/
Someone wrote on article on that very topic.
Thanks
Carl Webster
Citrix Technology Professional | iGel Tech Community Insider | Parallels VIPP
The link you provided is helpful - thanks.
According to our EA summary, I have an effective quantity of 4 x SQL Server
Standard Core 2016 licenses, with an unresolved quantity of 20 and an SA
quantity of 16, though I'm not entirely sure what all that means.
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:17
Thank you. That's very helpful.
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Michael B. Smith
wrote:
> Yes, it will work.
>
> I cannot say anything whatsoever about VMware. I'm a Hyper-V guy.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
Who was just on a list asking for help with VMware configuration? H?
樂
Kurt
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Webster wrote:
> Everyone has their faults.
>
>
> Webster
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
"Server Standard does NOT support Always On Availability Groups"
Sort of? As of SQL 2016, It supports Basic Availability Groups which are
AGs with limitations, they are managed the same way as a standard AG. They
don't scale particularly well but they avoid the pitfalls of a WSFC SQL
I haven't done it since Windows 2008 R2, but Microsoft clustering does work in
a vSphere environment if you have the shared storage (sounds like you do).
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent:
Everyone has their faults.
Webster
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 12:52 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] A new task for me -
Right. Server Datacenter. Knew that. Habit to type Enterprise.
The rest is stuff I'm trying to figure out, since I haven't played
around much with real SQL Server since the 2000 edition, and not even
much with Express since then.
We are planning a 2-node cluster, so it sounds like Windows Server
Server Enterprise has not existed since 2012 came out. Standard and Datacenter
both are licensed for Failover Clustering with the only difference being
virtualization rights.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of D R
Sent: Thursday, August
I think y’all are confusing yourselves. Words mean things.
For the purposes of this discussion, there is no such thing as “Windows Server
Enterprise”.
The editions are Windows Server Standard and Windows Server Datacenter. Since
Windows Server 2012, both Standard and Datacenter include Windows
According to the Techs and Sales people in my org, it seems that they did.
They are telling me that every SQL Clustering needs Enterprise on 2016, or
it's a 'no go'.
Daniel
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As best as I can recall, it
As best as I can recall, it was listed as a requirement in the last SQL
clustering requirements doc I read on Microsoft's website. I thought it
was up-to-date, but perhaps I am mistaken?
On Aug 17, 2017 6:55 AM, "Melvin Backus" wrote:
Windows clustering doesn’t
Windows clustering doesn’t require Enterprise any more. It moved to std with
2012. We run both LB and FO clusters on 2012 std. Please don’t tell me they
went back with 2016. L
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world...
those who understand binary and those who don't.
From:
Got it.
I can do that - we have an EA.
Thanks.
Kurt
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
wrote:
> The minimum requirement would be Windows.
>
> --
> Espi
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>
>> Windows or
The minimum requirement would be Windows.
--
Espi
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Windows or SQL or both?
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:27 PM, D R wrote:
> > Well, for 1, I think you're going to need Enterprise Edition for your
>
Windows or SQL or both?
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:27 PM, D R wrote:
> Well, for 1, I think you're going to need Enterprise Edition for your server
> clustering.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have a good
Well, for 1, I think you're going to need Enterprise Edition for your
server clustering.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Does anyone have a good reference on setting up a 2-node cluster like this?
>
> I'll be putting up SQL Server 2016 on Server 2016
Hate doing this, but I forgot to put in what is probably a fairly
significant datum
We don't have DRS - we only have vSphere Standard.
Kurt
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Does anyone have a good reference on setting up a 2-node cluster like this?
>
>
23 matches
Mail list logo