“(Dell says 30:1 or so)”
Did they say 30:1 or “UP TO” 30:1 ?
(remembering that UP TO starts with ZERO)
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
' Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Lists - Level5 [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Sunday,
Rob if you don't mind can you expand on your issues with your Quantum
device? I have 2 7500dxi's and they are functioning perfectly.
thanks
From: Rob Bonfiglio [mailto:robbonfig...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 2:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: De-duping
Hmmm... Where'd my breakfast go? Oh, never mind... here it is... all over my
shoes...
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 6:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Friday OT: Man's best friend?
I am at a loss for words on
May the schwartz be with you.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 6:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Massive Patch Tuesday
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 15:16, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at
You will have to pry our Data Domains from our cold stiff hands :)
So far, we have written 281 TB worth of backups to only 10 TB of disk. The
dedupe/compression varies significantly by data set. It also grows over
time. Our VM backups using vRanger are getting close to 70x dedupe, and
growing.
Thanks Kevin for some insight. Our DD will actually be in our datacenter
where about 80% of our servers are now, and we already do replication
SAN-SAN every 30 mins, so we wont be replicating the DD unit, but we will be
adding more and more. My biggest concern was managing the Symantec BEX for
the
I can second ExaGrid; we're using their solution here, and have had no problems.
I don't know how it compares with alternatives in terms of price, though.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
-Original Message-
From: Chyka, Robert
We are using Exagrid also. I think they might be a little higher priced
but I have had their solution in for over a year at 2 locations and the
product just works. I set it up once and haven't touched it since. We
dedup at one site and then send it across our WAN to another Exagrid box
for
I use both Nagios and Cacti. The only area about Nagios that I would
like more is trap management. Currently, you need to implement that
process yourself and glue it together.
I like Nagois. Over the years, (I've used it for half a dozen years -
maybe more), I've looked at other software.
I should have been clearer. It's not so much a problem with the Quantum, as
it is that it wasn't speced out properly. They knew it wasn't going to be
able to meet future expansion needs as it was ordered, but they needed a
solution in place quickly, and it was what they could afford at the time.
For those negotiating with EMC ... find the comparable Netapp solution.
Start mentioning that your requisition will be competitive. EMC does not
like NetApp and will get pretty agressive on pricing if they know they are
up against NetApp.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Rob Bonfiglio
Is there a way to do deduplication on the Windows Server level? I see Microsoft
has a Single instance Storage for Windows Storage Server 2008, but it doesn't
appear to be an available feature for any of their other Server products.
Any 3rd party DeDup on Windows support out there?
--Matt Ross
It appears to be at the top for Proactive (rather than simply
Reactive) - wow!
Alex Eckelberry al...@sunbelt-software.com wrote on 08/09/2010 11:53:21
AM:
Fwiw, VIPRE just made #1 in proactive detection in the latest
VirusBulletin test:
http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml
That seems to have worked, Coleman, thank you. Needed to have a '.' after
'arpa' in the command, but the link made that clear. For anyone's reference,
the IP on this reverse record was 10.1.1.101, and the command I used to smoke
it was:
dnscmd /RecordDelete 10.in-addr.arpa. 101.1.1 PTR
Its not available to my knowledge in any other product but Storage Server and
it is in use with their deployment technologies but that's it.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Hello World!
I'd be grateful to anyone out there who could give me a hand with this,
I've got SSH running on a mac (xserve) and I cannot quite figure out
how to publish it via our ISA.
i've tried a non-web server rule allowing port 22 in and out. and yet
this seems to not work.
traffic seems
Did you move that rule to the top?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: S Powell powe...@gmail.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Aug 09 15:39:55 2010
Subject: ssh publishing on ISA
Hello
yes it is the first rule.
Google.com Learn it. Live it. Love it.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:47, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
Did you move that rule to the top?
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: S Powell
ISA 2004 - firewall policy - use the New server publishing wizard:
Enter the internal server IP address.
Make a custom protocol with TCP / outbound / port 22.
Select External
I dont think you want the Web server publishing wizard as it requires a
listener. Same goes for the other new rule
ROCK ON!
FYI Y'all
the correct (for us YMMV) answer was:::
ISA 2006
_Publish Non-Web server protocol
== to internal Server IP address
selected Protocol == (user defined inbound SSH port 22 TCP inbound)
Listen on == External
badda bing
thank you John and Devin.
Google.com Learn it. Live
I've been tasked with setting up a file server structure for a client. SBS
2008. We normally set up Home, Shared, and Public. Client wants a completely
different paradigm. They want a master folder for each of their clients,
with subfolders below that which have varying permissions. So for
Hmm - I don't think this is hard to do (based on your requirements below). A
few groups and NTFS permissions accomplishes this.
You could have some folders setup as a template, and an admin would copy those
folders for each new client and just run a script that re-ACLs the folders...
(I am
22 matches
Mail list logo
