That's not really security. Once you have an account on a domain, you
are far more likely to be able to privilege escalate and further
penetrate the network/domain. The solution depends on how deep your
pockets are and how critical the data is. You could do it with a DMZ
based domain I guess ..
I am rolling PGP full disk encryption out this month, I am currently at 147
systems reporting in to the PGP console, with 45 of them people that are never
in the office (thank you SMS!!!). In our org if you have a laptop, the disk
gets encrypted. The central management features are the BOMB,
I have 7 production systems running on 3 different ESX boxes in an ESX cluster,
and 2 different logical SAN volumes (sorry am not SAN savvy, I just know I have
two different SAN volumes to choose from when making a VM).
Today, a SAN blows up and takes out half - our SharePoint server (heavily
Or Vipre, because Joseph has already indicated that he's familiar with them.
He's looking for other recommendations...
*ASB*
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Ryan Finnesey
ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com wrote:
No one as commented on the Forefront products.
*From:*
Yes, process failures can be deadly...
Also, it is more important in this day and age of massive consolidation to
make sure that your backups and DR are effective, because cascading failures
can take out much more of your infrastructure than ever before.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile)
Don't see much Trend chatter either.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Finnesey ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 1:12:24 AM
Subject: RE: AV Opinions
No one as commented on the
Yup,
And FF is prohibitively expensive in small environments, but it is my favorite.
Most reliable I have ever used, _never_ had an FP or a dead machine or a bad
dat. Its detection rates aren't quite as good as the top guys but you
compromise I guess.
Right now, I am keen on Sophos for the
All I can say is OUCH! :-(
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: How'd this for a bad day? AKA bad me
I have 7 production systems running on 3 different ESX boxes in an ESX
cluster, and 2 different logical SAN
Being slightly serious for a moment, it's a pretty good illustration of how
something like a SAN in isolation is no use :-)
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: 08 October 2010 13:43
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How'd this for a
Yep. Good point. :-) VERY good point!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How'd this for a bad day? AKA bad me
Being slightly serious for a moment, it's a pretty good
Agreed, but the OP was talking about a product that his client is selling.
Consulting with their customers about their network/domain design may be way
beyond the scope of their business. I interpreted the post as looking for
suggestions to improve the security of the product that might be
Why do you need to power down VMs to reboot vCenter? vCenter might be the
problem with the missing VMs. VMWare support might be able to help you with
those.
Jeff
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have 7 production systems running on 3 different ESX boxes
+1 I'm just getting caught up on emails this morning. vCenter reboot
shouldn't necessitate a reboot of a host server.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Bunting bunting.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you need to power down VMs to reboot vCenter? vCenter might be the
problem with the
I don't know the exact details (and don't remember at the moment), my guess is
they needed to do something SAN side - I just now heard one SAN store is what
died. Today is gonna bite..
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 6:35 AM
To: NT System Admin
I used these guys:
http://www.racksolutions.com/
They were incredibly helpful.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.comwrote:
All
I'm putting in a rack for about 6 servers in a vault at a client and need
recommendations on what rack systems you're happy with.
Anyone tell me why 2 AD DNS servers that were running perfectly find would
suddenly stop doing all recursive queries outside of the network. I had to run
this
dnscmd /config /EnableEDNSProbes 0
which apparently disables larger UDP packets, but I am trying to find out if
there was an recent
Crickets..
No POD people here ?
From: pchow...@yahoo.com pchow...@yahoo.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Thu, October 7, 2010 2:54:57 PM
Subject: HP PODs
Anyone have good or bad reviews on the HP POD or other
BTW their was no firewall change, same one that has been in their for 6 months
at least.
From: greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net [mailto:greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:49 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DNS on 2008R2
Anyone tell me why 2 AD DNS servers
+1 on the APC NetShelter line, but be careful on the model you choose! I say
that, because some of them don't have enough space, in my opinion, for high
density applications (at least not the models we're using).
Our biggest issue is not having enough space to run all the cables for a high
I think I'm the violin player on the deck of the Titanic. You have good
intentions, but it is going to end badly for you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Oh no.
What's up?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote:
I think I'm the violin player on the deck of the Titanic. You have good
intentions, but it is going to end badly for you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
That don't sound good.
All ok?
On Oct 8, 2010 11:23 AM, Candee can...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh no.
What's up?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.com
wrote:
I think I'm the v...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
+1 from here as well. A vCenter reboot should not require a host reboot. If it
did, that would (IMHO) be a huge problem in the design and purpose behind
VMware. Talk to VMware. If your maintenance is not current, get current.
On a related note, YESTERDAY, one of our storage groups on our SAN
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have 7 production systems ...
Oh, boy. Fun. I've had days like that. Not many, fortunately (and
knock on wood). Hope you get it all sorted out in time for the
weekend!
Today I find myself having to arbitrate a pooch
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.com wrote:
I think I'm the violin player on the deck of the Titanic. You have good
intentions, but it is going to end badly for you.
That sounds bad. As in don't cross the streams bad.
Things are fine, the upcoming
Machines are recalcitrant, they're just misunderstood.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I have 7 production systems ...
Oh, boy. Fun. I've had days like that. Not many, fortunately
It seems like a good firewall to use. I always liked external computers...
It's only about $1,000 if you look around. Anyone had better use of any others?
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To
If the systems are still actually on the LUNs, then you should be able to
reconnect them and bring them up. Rebooting vCenter should not have had
anything to do with shutting down guests but rebooting the SAN might
possibly have been required to address it's fire.
From vCenter just reconnect to
Your not is AWOL
*ASB *
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Machines are recalcitrant, they're just misunderstood.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM, David Lum
That's not the only thing...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Your not is AWOL
*ASB *
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jonathan Link
jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Machines are recalcitrant, they're just misunderstood.
On Fri, Oct 8,
I've said it before, but I will say it again.
In a highly virtualized, heavily consolidated world, we need more planning,
more thinking and more time for effective execution.
Cutting corners will become more and more painful, and will bite more and
more organizations.
Hopefully, enough near
I have some configuration changes I am planning for and this involves adding a
NIC
to a W2k8r2 box that's untagged into a Storage vlan on a different segment. So
long
as that interface is not set to register itself in DNS (it will never be
addressed by this
ip) is there anything else I
Is that $1000 with all the services? Or just for the device?
SonicWall is okay, although I haven't used their devices in a few years. I
prefer the Fortigate devices from Fortinet
- http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortigate/
- http://www.fortinet.com/doc/FortinetMatrix.pdf
*ASB *(My
Looking to utilize an IM solution for about 3 users right now. Might
expand to about 10 users - so please, no over the top large enterprise
recommendations.
Requirements:
Security
Trail/Logging
Can work over WAN
I can provide a backend server if needed.
A virtual appliance would be even
Haven't looked to much into it, but Exchange 2007 and 2010 have unified
communications built in. I would think that you would be able to lock
it down via AD and GP.
_
Cameron Cooper
Network Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone:
Jabber??? I know you can deploy your own Jabber server. Not sure if it would
meet all your requirements, but it might be something to look at.
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 12:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: IT Solutions for a tiny
Yeah I seem to run into this kind of I should change my career event once
every five years or so, although this event isn't nearly as stressful as being
at a client (these down systems are at %dayjob%) and having a RAID5 card die
and thinking I don't even know how the RAID volumes were
Would this work for you? I don't know about logging, but it is hosted, so you
would only have to pay a monthly fee. You don't have to have a Cisco
infrastructure in order to use it. You would only need Cisco if you wanted IP
phone and/or soft phone integration...and it can connect from behind a
Just be glad it didn't happen on a Monday! Terrible way to start off a week!
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday,
Openfire/Spark? Looks promising and can be put on Windows or Linux. Looks
like it can also integrate with AD. Dunno if it meets all your requirements or
not, but here's the site:
http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/documentation.jsp
From: Sam Cayze
Sent: Friday, October 08,
You don't need to have Microsoft File Sharing on this NIC at all, right?
*ASB *
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
I have some configuration changes I am planning for and this involves
adding a NIC
to a W2k8r2 box that’s untagged into a
Please define security in this context.
*ASB*
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Sam Cayze sam.ca...@rollouts.com wrote:
Looking to utilize an IM solution for about 3 users right now. Might
expand to about 10 users – so please, no over the top large enterprise
recommendations.
Amen
-Original Message-
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: How'd this for a bad day? AKA bad me
I've said it before, but I will say it again.
In a highly virtualized, heavily consolidated
Sì signore,
It will only have TCP Port 3260, pings actually are disabled anyway on the
SAN...
I guess I can uncheck the Client for Microsoft Networks, QoS Packet
Scheduler
and the File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks.
jlc
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent:
The standard edition of OCS2007r2 can do this on one server. It will also
provide you with additional nice tools in the way of desktop sharing and
video conferencing between these folks should that be desirable later. If
by security you mean secure communications between clients, then OCS2007r2
We used to have McCleod and switched over to Cimco. They were great to
work with what we already had in place and were very helpful with any
issues. Very little down time.
_
Cameron Cooper
Network Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone:
At the moment we have 2 bonded T1's and one leased Point-2-Point line
with them. Once we move to a new building later this year we are
switching over to fiber.
_
Cameron Cooper
Network Administrator | CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021 | Fax:
Has anyone had to manually add a SPN to a multi-node cluster SQL 2005
box before?
I used the spn_query.vbs script from Microsoft to look at each of the
nodes of the cluster and the Cluster Name and the SQL Server name (
Still default instance)
Used the best practices that doesn't have the SQL
We use Spark, love it. Integrates with our Asterisk system, AD, Website(in
testing). We can transfer a phone call from our phone to the chat client and
vice versa from anywhere. Features are good, lots of customization. It does
take some work to get it going.
From: James Winzenz
Sound Solutions, Inc.
8400 Highland Dr.
Wausau, WI 54401
Tel: 715-842-7665
Fax: 715-842-7620
I set up a laptop with Windows 7 and Offline Files yesterday. The
Offline Files is terrible in Windows 7. You have to click too much for
the normal user. Does anyone know of any decent replacements for
Mainly that all communication is over an encrypted connection; such as
SSL. I'm just started my research, trying to become aware of other
concerns as well.
Also, my subject line was supposed to be IM, not IT...
Sam
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday,
Please state the nature of your medical emergency...
What you do mean you have to click too much?!?
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Craig Gauss cra...@sound-solutions.bizwrote:
I set up a
Leave the gateway entry empty, clear the box on register with DNS and on the
WINs tab uncheck the box for LMHOST lookup.
In the advanced networking make sure the binding order has this NIC second.
(Note in Windows 2008 you may have to enable menu's to see the menu.) Also
consider renaming the NIC
I have had this problem before. I don't remember a lot firsthand, but I
do have my notes about it. Copied/pasted below.
When multiple computers are traversed for integrated authentication
(e.g. computer connects to web server which connects to SQL server),
there are certain requirements for
Sound Solutions, Inc.
8400 Highland Dr.
Wausau, WI 54401
Tel: 715-842-7665
Fax: 715-842-7620
From what I experienced you had to go into sync center, then offline
files, then through the folder hierarchy to finally get to the files.
Unlike XP where it was directly in the folder on the desktop.
Just frustrated. Small consulting company, disengaged/distracted
owner. The one person around here that I don't really do his job for
him just quit...so now I'm figuring out how to do his job too.
Sorry for the venting, guys.
Candee wrote:
Oh no.
What's up?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:19
Thanks for the info, Cameron.
Cameron Cooper wrote:
We used to have McCleod and switched over to Cimco. They were great to
work with what we already had in place and were very helpful with any
issues. Very little down time.
_
Cameron Cooper
Network Administrator |
Bill thanks for the offline comments, we are going to try and move it
off a SQL cluster for this time, if that doesn't help stuff then well go
the SPN route, which I believe its going to have to happen anyways to
fix the clusters accordingly, Unless I temporarly make the accounts DA,
recycle the
I haven’t seen, used or set it up yet, but I know Synch Toy has started being
used on a handful of workstation machines here. No complaints heard, only that
it works “better” than offline files.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W.
No problem, Edward, although I honestly am not sure how I managed to
reply offline. D'oh!
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 2:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Setting SPN's on Clustered SQL (2005)
Bill
Sorry to hear that.
Hope they at least compensate you with his pay. :) But that would be wishful
thinking.
If you need anything, let us know.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.comwrote:
Just frustrated. Small consulting company, disengaged/distracted owner.
Good morning/afternoon!
I wanted to get some feedback from you all regarding the use of 3rd
party Defrag utilities. We've used Diskkeeper for as long as I can remember
(from NT4, Win2000, etc.) We're all Windows 2003 with a few Windows 2008
servers in production and more on the way. One of my
I haven't had to do that. The offline files are right where I have expected
them to be if the drive was previously mapped. Also available if you use
UNC mapping to the location.
*ASB*
* *
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Craig Gauss cra...@sound-solutions.bizwrote:
From what I experienced
DOh,
Silly me... too fried these days...
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 2:28 PM
To:
Yeah and the 64bit SQL box didn't work, go figures... back to the hell
next week.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
-Original Message-
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
No - we defeated the aliens and chased them off the planet...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 07:51, Pete Howard pchow...@yahoo.com wrote:
Crickets..
No POD people here ?
--
*From:* pchow...@yahoo.com pchow...@yahoo.com
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Bill Humphries nt...@hedgedigger.com wrote:
Small consulting company, disengaged/distracted owner.
The one person around here that I don't really do his job for him ...
Sounds like my last job.
That's why I quit. After 5 years, I realized it wasn't going to
We use folder redirection for users' desktops and My Documents folders, and
offline files so that they'll still have access to their stuff if they lose
connection to the network. Can't say I've seen any clicking necessary, except
in cases of file version conflicts.
John Hornbuckle
MIS
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
The avenue closes as the percentage of XP machines ... how long for that?
I'm guessing XP is less than 50% of Windows users before April 2014, and if
not by then, real soon afterwards.
People running as admin when
I have a 2824 with two vlans, 100 for prod and 103 for ip san. It's not
currently
in routed mode, but I want assign ips to the two vlans and set it up in routed
mode so the switch can route traffic between servers and the san vlan for
bandwidth reasons.
My issue is the lack of acl's, any client
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
And I would say that we are were we are because as consumers and corporate
customers, we don't push for things to be different. Not that technology
companies don't have their own responsibility to do the right thing, but
Yep, its defintely like that, until they get royally 0wned, then its Chicken
Little the Sky is falling, and by then its too late you are the next poster boy
for newspapers, and the fallout.
So really who wants to be the next TJX/Hannaford Foods/ etc etc, sorry I will
pass. I don't care if I
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com wrote:
Personally I think you’re making a mountain out of a mole hill. Like I said
this is really a common design.
Without knowing more (and we on this list don't really know the
details from that post), I think the OP *may*
+9000
--
From: Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 1:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Interesting run-down on Stuxnet from F-Secure
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM,
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I have a 2824 with two vlans, 100 for prod and 103 for ip san. It’s not
currently in routed mode, but I want assign ips to the two vlans and set
it up in routed mode so the switch can route traffic between servers
I would not use the 2824 as a router for anything serious, and
bandwidth reasons makes it sound serious.
Do you know what it takes to route even at gig speeds? It doesn't
need to be serious at all to desire to route faster than most routers:)
Its iSCSI traffic, letting even a 2824 pass it
So, the root cause: ESX 3.5 OS was installed onto SAN volume that contained my
VM's. The install of that OS (effectively) removes pointers that VM's need when
they boot up. Best practice is to disconnect the SAN links when installing this
version of the OS so this doesn't happen. In fact our SE
UAC prompting isn't the major benefit of UAC. The major benefit is that, for
admins, programs that aren't admin-by-nature run without admin rights. If
the admin user runs a malware executable that tries to write something to a
protected file/registry area, it will fail (unless it also exploits a
Experience may not be the best teacher, but it is the most expensive one...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 13:34, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
So, the root cause: ESX 3.5 OS was installed onto SAN volume that contained
my VM’s. The install of that OS (effectively) removes pointers that VM’s
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
I would not use the 2824 as a router for anything serious, and
bandwidth reasons makes it sound serious.
Do you know what it takes to route even at gig speeds?
To the best of my knowledge, simply sending or
KnowBe4 will soon release it's first Internet Security Awareness Training
product.
It will make end-users aware of the dangers of social engineering and spear
phishing.
If you are interested, here is a beta you can check out:
http://www.ptrain.com/isat/draft1/
We need your input
Sounds like you should home the redundant sets of VMs on different SAN
volumes/whatever?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: How'd this for a bad
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Carl Houseman c.house...@gmail.com wrote:
UAC prompting isn't the major benefit of UAC. The major benefit is that, for
admins, programs that aren't admin-by-nature run without admin rights. If
the admin user runs a malware executable that tries to write
Are you using forwarders? Have they been changed?
Our older version Cisco Network Registrar goes bonkers if I dont disable
EDNS Probes on the 2008R2 dc's that forward to it.
-Anders
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:48 PM, greg.swe...@actsconsulting.net wrote:
Anyone tell me why 2 AD DNS servers that
To the best of my knowledge, simply sending or receiving full frames
at gig speeds is enough to stress most PCs, let alone forwarding them.
The bottleneck is usually bus bandwidth or interrupt load. While I
don't know, I would expect the routing on the 2800 to be done on the
management CPU,
Indeed our Blink product goes way beyond traditional anti-virus by actually
preventing the exploitation of vulnerabilities that lead then to attackers
loading malware. Most all AV and related are simply looking for the malware
that is deployed to a system after it has been exploited and in
No, the UAC prompt may not happen. UAC prompting only happens for specific
programs that are recognized as needing elevation. It does NOT happen for
every API call that might fail if not elevated.
Yes, the malware writers could make their malware smart enough to cause the
UAC prompt and gain
Stu,
My first feedback, before I can comment on the content, is that it RUDELY
maximized my browser window on my screen without asking, and without need,
it doesn't even come close to filling up the screen on my 22 monitor.
In most cases, when a site does that, I'm not to fast to return. Just
So far, so good.
When the finished product comes out, I'd pass that link around to our staff.
I didn't see options for the name, however.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:03, Stu Sjouwerman s...@sunbelt-software.com wrote:
KnowBe4 will soon release it's first Internet Security Awareness Training
89 matches
Mail list logo
