Hi
I am looking for some Bare metal Virtualisation software the criteria I
have been given is that it must be
FREE!
I looked on Vmware website and although they list
VMware vSphere Hypervisor
As Free it seem the product when I installed it said It was a 60 day
version - they gave me a serial
You can use VMWare ESXi, this is the free version
ALso Citrix's XenServer has a free version too which is quite good
On 19 September 2011 09:16, Nigel Parker nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.ukwrote:
Hi
I am looking for some Bare metal Virtualisation software the criteria I
have been given is that
VMware ESXi:
http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_cloud_infrastructure/vmware_vsphere_hypervisor_esxi/5_0
Citrix XenServer: http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_1688615.asp
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
-Original
Hi thanks
I tried the Vmware esxi this version also said it was a 60 day version
Again in the text (help docs) it says go to home- admin and licensing
although I couldn't find a licensing option?
Will look at the Citrix Zenserver
Thanks
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Webster
I went to the Download page, clicked the License Download tab, logged in, and
was should my license key immediately. Also, literally immediately, I received
an e-mail from VMware to activate my Evaluation copy of ESXi.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
I recall getting emailed the license details straight away as well, for ESXi
On 19 September 2011 09:56, Webster webs...@carlwebster.com wrote:
I went to the Download page, clicked the License Download tab, logged in,
and was should my license key immediately. Also, literally immediately, I
Hi
Yep received all that
When I install the software however and view the server with the client
it says it's a 60 day version
I cant see where I am supposed to enter the license on the server
Regards
Nigel
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: 19
Ahh
Ok never looked here, was reading all the other documentation that said
click the licensing tab
Done !
Many thanks
Regards
Nigel
From: Anders Blomgren [mailto:chanks...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 September 2011 10:51
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
Ok I think I need to start over. I think my 3 DC's are not talking to
each other because the Group Policies on one don't match the Group
policies on the others. Running DC Diag I notice FRS has an error.
I am on a Windows 2003 Active Directory. I have 3 DC's that were
talking to each other at
What's the error say? You can more than likely plug it in to Google and get
your answer.
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: DC's and FRS errors
Ok I think I need to start over. I think my 3 DC's
+1 I had FRS errors a few months ago, GTS (Google Technical Support) was
very effective at pointing out methods for resolution. I'd use them again
in the future... :-)
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Martin Blackstone
mblackst...@gmail.comwrote:
What’s the error say? You can more than
For kicksis this machine wireless? If so, have you tried while connected
to the wire with the wireless turned off after rooting?
Jonathan A+, MCSA, MCSE
Thumb-typed from my HTC Droid Incredible (and yes, it really is) on the
Verizon network. Please excuse brevity and any misspellings.
On
This one is wired, alas.
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: One Machine Can't Access DFS
For kicksis this machine wireless? If so, have you tried while connected to
the wire with the wireless turned
Do you get a different result if you use fqdn vs short name resolution?
-Anders
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 sep 2011, at 15:10, John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
wrote:
I’ve got one client machine (Win7 SP1) that seems to be unable to access DFS
resources. Regardless of who you’re
I've only tried it using FQDN-haven't tried short name. Would be willing to
give it a shot, although either should work. Theoretically. :)
From: Anders Blomgren [mailto:chanks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: One Machine Can't
Also eventid.net.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: DC's and FRS errors
+1 I had FRS errors a few months ago, GTS (Google Technical Support) was
Free? Why not this?
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=3512
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Virtualisation software
Hi
I am
You seem to have gotten your desired solution working
For the sake of completeness there is a bare metal free version of HyperV
available as well. Oracale Virtual Box is also out there though I have not
used it beyond an occasional desktop test environment.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Nigel
For Bare Metal + Free, I think your only options are ESXi and XenServer.
For nearly Bare Metal + Free, check out:
Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 -
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=3512
ProxmoxVE - http://pve.proxmox.com/
We ended up using Hyper-V, but not the nearly
Have a situation where my main 2008 DC is no longer working properly. It's
not processing logon requests anymore and is really hosed. I have several
other 2008 DCs that are operating fine still. I am considering two options:
1. Boot into AD Restore Mode, and run DCPROMO /forceremoval. Then
I would try to transfer roles before I seized them.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
- Original Message -
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
To: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Mon Sep 19 12:23:57 2011
Un-informed, knee-jerk response:
Reboot?
DCDiag?
--Matt Ross
Ephrata School District
- Original Message -
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
[mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Mon, 19 Sep 2011
09:23:57 -0700
Subject:
One of our techs has already gone through 2-3 hours of troubleshooting this
(reboots, checking event logs, etc.) Gone through all that already. So now
we're deciding which of the two options I mentioned sound better.?
Original Message:
-
From: Matthew W. Ross
Please use option 1.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: jesse-r...@wi.rr.com [mailto:jesse-r...@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: 2008 DC problem - uh oh
That's the direction we're leaning. Your reasons why?
Original Message:
-
From: Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:40:12 +
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: 2008 DC problem - uh oh
Please use option 1.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
Because it's the right thing to do? Restoring from backup to recover a DC is
really a last ditch option IMO when it isn't possible to just re-replicate over
the wire.
I'm not sure what lead to your problem but you may just want to rebuild the box
all together?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
He's the expert?
On Monday, September 19, 2011, jesse-r...@wi.rr.com jesse-r...@wi.rr.com
wrote:
That's the direction we're leaning. Your reasons why?
Original Message:
-
From: Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:40:12 +
To:
I just did your Option 1 a couple of weeks ago for a customer when I had to
rebuild both of their unstable DCs. Option 1 works. I did the most unstable
DC first which was the one that had the 5 FSMO roles.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
Yep, rebuild, don't even try and fix the problem server.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
+1 with this approach. Much cleaner to remove it and rebuild.
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 9:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2008 DC problem - uh oh
Yep, rebuild, don't even try and fix the problem
Sorry if a better query already came thru..
What about checking the registry:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\SUA
- or -
HKLM\Software\Microsoft\SUA\Current_Release
My 2008 box shows release 4.0
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:26, Paul Hutchings paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk wrote:
I think there are a few ways to skin this cat so I’m throwing it open for
any views on the pros and cons of each.
An office, network ports are wall mounted and all go back to a central comms
cupboard.
In the
Yes. I recently did this at home (a few months ago).
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Greg Olson gol...@markettools.com wrote:
+1 with this approach. Much cleaner to remove it and
Some random thoughts since you haven't described the current network, amount
of files, do both groups need access to some of the shared files, number of
users, budget, etc.
Leave the trusted people on the network and apply the appropriate file
permissions.
Identify the untrusted ports (so
IPSec or 802.1x come to mind.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Best way to restrict access to file server?
I
File server two nics.
1 nic on your untrusted users vlan, the other on your trusted users vlan.
Create a share on the untrusted users side, and the same share on your trusted
users side.
Setup the untrusted nic as a member of the private profile on the firewall
(assuming win 2008+) and only open
I don't believe you can scope shares to IPs outside of a cluster?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best way to
SharePoint
-Jeff Steward
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Paul Hutchings
paul.hutchi...@mira.co.ukwrote:
I think there are a few ways to skin this cat so I’m throwing it open for
any views on the pros and cons of each.
** **
An office, network ports are wall mounted and all go back
I want to extract a portion of users/groups/policies/etc AND computers)
from an existing forest (one domain) and set up a new forest with this
subset.
The old forest will still be in existance and I will set up a one way trust
(old forest trusts new forest)
Just trying to create a list of what
Found the answer. I had (part of IT policy) disabled IPV6, but not fully...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
Applications which are using LDAP integration. Complex apps like Exchange,
SharePoint. Servers that have to move...
Read the ADMT Migration Guide - it's an extensive document that goes through
planning this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
Enable logon failure auditing on both the server hosting the DFS namespace and
the target server, and what which server is denying you access, and for what
reason?
Cheers
Ken
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Monday, 19 September 2011 10:44 PM
To: NT System
Thanks, I am in two minds as to whether to use ADMT (and other migration
tools) or not as there may be irrelevant groups and rubbish in group
policies and alike. I will keep reading.
Basically spliting off 50 or so users out of 400, and the old forest will
trust the new forest and the 350 left on
43 matches
Mail list logo
