I've used DNS Made Easy for 7 or 8 years with no issues. For SSL, I was using
Thawte which is part of VeriSign. As soon as Symantec bought VeriSign, I
bailed on the impending doom and now use Network Solutions SSL certs. Network
Solutions SSL prices are reasonable. I've found if you have a
Have no fear: at the rate that Java exploits and vulnerabilities are being
found in Java, they'll be providing more updates shortly. Maybe they'll
fix that problem, or maybe more people will get the impetus to work around
them.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*
First hit on Google:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4394607/vbscript-to-check-if-net-2-0-is-installed
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
Thanks, Christopher.
I did see that and then wondered if 2.0 is installed on all systems and
couldn’t find an answer. Windows 7 comes with .NET 3.5 OOB and my system also
has 2.0. Is that the case with all Windows 7 systems? i.e. Is it sufficient
to do a check for 2.0 or do I need to check
Yes, all Windows 7 systems come with 2.0 , 3.0 and 3.5 installed
If your install only requires 2.0 or higher, then check for 2.0 and you
should be fine.
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel
Thank you!
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: February-26-13 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need help with VBscript
Yes, all Windows 7 systems come with 2.0 , 3.0 and 3.5 installed
If your install only requires 2.0 or higher, then check for
BTW - is this also the case for Vista XP? i.e. version 2.0 is installed?
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: February-26-13 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Need help with VBscript
Yes, all Windows 7 systems come with 2.0 , 3.0 and 3.5
The issues raised by the team member who started the discussion center around
some of their practices (obnoxious/exploitive commercials, support for SOPA,
etc). I'm not really seeing those as business driving decisions, but there are
other issues that do annoy me like their less than friendly
We did this a few years back with a 5508 controller and several aps.
Basically, you will need one vlan for the aps to talk to the controller.
You will have to convert the access points to light weight aps.
That wasn't very intuitive, so here is a link.
Take a look at these:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2007/03/14/mailbag-what-version-of-the-net-framework-is-included-in-what-version-of-the-os.aspx
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1164495/windows-7-default-net-framework
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate
Though my comment was meant to be snarky, that's actually interesting.
I may have to look at those units
Kurt
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote:
The Synology SAN/NAS devices have a mobile app that you can use to easily
access your own storage from
I'm not familiar with Smart Sync, so can't comment on that. But can you
reproduce the problem outside of that software? For example do you see the
same slowness if you use RoboCopy or DFSR?
Take a look at this post:
You can look all you want but you can't do anything until you buy one. :)
snark
Thanks
Webster
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: 50GB free storage from Box.com
Though my comment was meant to be snarky, that's actually interesting.
I
Anti-virus?
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Communications slow between two servers
Greetings,
I have an odd communications issue that I just can't pin down. I have two
existing servers, X and Y. X
The devil's in the detail.
Which OS?
Scalable networking pack on 2003 SP2 can cause these issues. Try turning off
TCP offload, Receive Side Scaling, etc, and see if that improves anything.
Oh, and check duplex settings on server and switch.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Infrastructure Engineer
Hoople
X has AV installed?
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:04 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Communications slow between two servers
NIC drivers?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Eric Brouwer
TCP offload/chimney settings?
It's always that. Don't know why it even still exists.
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Communications slow between two servers
And NIC firmware? TCP
DigiCert for certs hands down. I can't comment on DNS providers.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:25 PM
To: NT System Admin
Verify duplex settings. A long time ago I had an HP server and a Cisco switch
with both sides having auto-detecting speed and duplex. Weird things happened
when transferring large quantities of data because the NIC thought the
connection was full duplex and the switch thought it was half.
Odd, didn't think that the 2012 server install disk actually came on a CD
anymore. I've just used the ISO so far. Right click, mount and then run
setup.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
I upgraded my personal lab server from 2008 R2 to Server 2012 last
That hadn't occurred to me :), I burned the ISO.
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: This can't be right (2008R2 - 2012)
Odd, didn't think that the 2012 server install disk actually came on a CD
anymore.
2012 Hyper V is awesome
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:10 AM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
That hadn’t occurred to me J, I burned the ISO.
** **
*From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:01 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:*
So true ASB
Hello All,
We had yet another look into Oracle's Java SE 7 software that was released by
the company on Feb 19, 2013. As a result, we have discovered two new security
issues (numbered 54 and 55), which when combined together can be successfully
used to gain a complete Java
I really like what I'm seeing for DigiCert, but my concern is that the price
point may be an issue given that our current (or RapidSSL) are significantly
lower.
DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: Brian Desmond
+10,. Updated 2 hosts over the weekend.
Now converting guests to vhdx, at least the ones I can shutdown during the day.
On a related note, when we started all the vhd were created as 127gig dynamic
disks.
Is it possible to convert them to fixed size but shrink them to about 10 or 20
percent
I use VM's whenever possible, even if it's a 1:1. Moves/upgrades are simply
much easier. I'd run 2VM's if licensing isn't an issue.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Yea, run VM's. No reason not to and lots of little reasons why you should.
I'd run 2VM's if licensing isn't an issue.
Licensing shouldn't be an issue, IIRC you can run 4 VM's under one server
license.
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday,
I've recently helped a company build out several branch offices and one to
deploy a remote datacenter.
We virtualized everything. Absolutely everything.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:24 PM
To: NT System Admin
Thanks for the input.
I knew about the conversion from autonomous to lightweight, and have
the manual that describes the process, as noted below.
I already have in place the necessary VLANs - one each for management
(which is shared among all switches), production wireless and guest
wireless.
Server/VM ratios depend on Server OS version.
I think you are thinking of Server 2008 R2 Standard which does give you 4 VMs
per server license.
However that has changed in Server 2012 Standard. You are only allowed 2 VMs
per server license. Server 2012 Datacenter gives you unlimited. While
Not quite correct. As I understand it, only control and management traffic
goes between the WLC AP. Everything else (ie client traffic) goes direct.
If you have any AP's hanging off the PoE port and need to free one up think
about using a power injector instead. Not ideal and may not be suitable
We have two ESXi hosts and an external drive array for even the small
offices with 1-3 guests. Windows 2012 wasn't out in the release cycle for
hardware refresh and we have a large ESXi install base now. We're looking
at HyperV but change is slow if at all :)
Getting Engineers onsite if there
No personal experience, but those reviews give me pause.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations Information Security) for
the SMB market…***
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu
I am unsure what I am doing wrong. I want a list of all my user
accounts, and I want the contents of the MemberOf property, among
other things.
Get-QADuser -SizeLimit 0 | Select
Not the way I read it, but it's not well written, so I could easily be
wrong, and sincerely hope you're correct. That would simplify things a
great deal.
Thanks,
Kurt
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Patrick Salmon psal...@gmail.com wrote:
Not quite correct. As I understand it, only control
I have no experience with the Seagate NASes either. Personally, for this
use case, I wouldn't consider something that doesn't support some manner of
dual disk failure protection such as RAID 6.* I'd also be looking for
something with a minimum of 5 bays so I could have at least one hot spare
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Michael Leone oozerd...@gmail.com wrote:
I am unsure what I am doing wrong. I want a list of all my user
accounts, and I want the contents of the MemberOf property, among
other things.
Get-QADuser -SizeLimit 0 | Select
.memberOF outputs an array and arrays don't play well with other types of
info with just a straight select-object
I used to use Get-QadUser JDoe | Get-QADMemberOf for this type of stuff
Haven't actually had to solve this problem in a while now though.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Michael
I have my home NAS in RAID5 (4x2TB), and let me tell you it takes a long
time to rebuild.
I'm willing to risk a larger rebuild window for more storage (at home), so
no RAID6 there -- this time, anyway.
*ASB
**http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* http://xeeme.com/AndrewBaker*
**Providing Virtual CIO
http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/22/4013406/i-used-google-glass-its-the-future-with-monthly-updates
On several levels, including:
o- Too many areas without network capability - where I live, anyway.
o- Voice interaction. Really? No thanks.
o- Privacy. Do I really want Google to know that much
Personally I would go the one physical running Hyper-V and two virtual servers
splitting the work. Unless you prefer to go the VMware route and do the same.
I would take the free version of VMware and save the money. I have never had
or heard of any good experiences with running a
I probably sound like a broken record, but what requirements and constraints do
you have?
E.g. I did a project to deploy something like this to ~600 branch sites. In
that case, the SCCM, AD, File Print and Wintel teams are all separate, so
that was a key consideration in designing the end
I'll add that if you can... Look into the Cisco 3945. You can put a UCS
blade with plenty of RAM, disk and processor, 48 port POE switch and T1,
ADSL or 4g cards in it. I call it network in a box or NIB. Sweet setup and
simplifies things.
On Feb 26, 2013 11:53 AM, Andrew S. Baker
43 matches
Mail list logo
