F5?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:51 PM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
On of my remote users uses AOL for his internet provider (yeah, I know...
who still uses AOL???) and he's complaining that his view of the intranet
page isn't showing up properly -- stuff is missing, or old
User has a Dr. Dr. it hurts when I do this problem. Stop doing that.
Even if the user is actually using AOL as an ISP (seems unlikely), there is
no requirement to use the AOL-provided software for surfing the net. The
user should be using a current/modern browser.
Carl
-Original
Unfortunately, my mother continues to use AOL. I can't get her to drop it
and use IE. To her, AOL _IS_ the Internet.
To add insult to injury, she continues to PAY for it even though it's free!
Agonizing
Roger Wright
___
Dr. Seuss is my favorite rapper! Cat - Hat... sheer genius!
On
minimize that aol screen and have him use ie. dont use the aol browser, that
was a subset of ie.
drod...@gmail.com
Sent via Dell Streak 7
On Jul 21, 2011 3:52 PM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
wrote:
On of my remote users uses AOL for his internet provider (yeah, I know...
who still
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, my mother continues to use AOL. I can't get her to drop it
and use IE. To her, AOL _IS_ the Internet.
To add insult to injury, she continues to PAY for it even though it's free!
Does she still rent her
probably has one of the older type phones that were hand cranked. :-)
drod...@gmail.com
Sent via Dell Streak 7
On Jul 21, 2011 10:46 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, my mother continues to use AOL. I
Nope - she's progressed a bit. Even has basic cable (12 channels) now.
Roger Wright
___
Dr. Seuss is my favorite rapper! Cat - Hat... sheer genius!
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com
cable box the old slide selector type?
drod...@gmail.com
Sent via Dell Streak 7
On Jul 21, 2011 11:00 PM, Roger Wright rhw...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope - she's progressed a bit. Even has basic cable (12 channels) now.
Roger Wright
___
Dr. Seuss is my favorite rapper! Cat - Hat... sheer genius!
[mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 07, 2009 11:59 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
m...@d himem sk1llz?
-sc
*From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 07, 2009 11:55 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
Nice
So you went from one version of Cutler's VMS to the next version of
Mica^H^H^H^H VMS ;-)
-sc
From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
My first computer gig in '95 we were running
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
m...@d himem sk1llz?
-sc
*From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 07, 2009 11:55 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
sure, specific questions or just a flashback ? g Wasn't
+1
It would squeeze an additional 30-40 bytes of memory. Certain games
would need that extra. 30-40 bytes are you kidding me? J
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
QEMM was cool
...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 9:40 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: AOL
QEMM was cool, but there were two other competitors:
1 that I forget, and another that became my favorite: Helix NetRoom...
-ASB
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Len Hammond
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Andrew S. Bakerasbz...@gmail.com wrote:
QEMM was cool, but there were two other competitors:
1 that I forget, and another that became my favorite: Helix NetRoom...
You might be thinking of 386MAX. Of the two, I liked QEMM better.
I never used Helix.
Ah,
I had a whole building full of co-ax. With no way to test any of it when I
got started, I ended up with a leg over 800feet in length. It was flakey
to say the least. Once I got a tester and found the length and shortened it
it became much more reliable. Most of my users were so afraid of the
reasonable numbers of machines on each run.
-Brian
From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
I had a whole building full of co-ax. With no way to test any of it when
I got
What ever happened to the 5-4-3 rule grin
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
I inherited a network many years ago
, August 10, 2009 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: AOL
What ever happened to the 5-4-3 rule grin
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
--
From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
What ever happened to the 5-4-3 rule grin
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
From: Webb
Ah, yes. 386Max
Yeah, I liked QEMM better, and Helix NetRoom even better.
-ASB
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Andrew S. Bakerasbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
QEMM was cool, but there were two other competitors:
1
...@abideinternational.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Free, Bobr...@pge.com wrote:
Bingo. Most of the 5250 cards had TwinAx connections so the
cabling
gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
Groan. One word. Arcnet.
At one stage, we started putting a bead of solder between the T-piece
:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
Groan. One word. Arcnet.
At one stage, we started putting a bead of solder between the T-piece
and the male connector so that they could only remove the T from the NIC.
--
Peter van Houten
On the 07/08/2009 22:40, Ben Scott wrote the following
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to
support AOL clients I found its software seemed to bind with the NIC
drivers (or the TCP/IP stack, I forget which) in an unusual way. IIRC it
made me think it acted like a special AOL loopback
@nwea.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:34 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to support
AOL clients I found its software seemed to bind with the NIC drivers (or the
TCP/IP stack, I forget which
.
About as badly as the original NetWare client for Win95 did…
-sc
*From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:34 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to support
AOL
:* RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to support
AOL clients I found its software seemed to bind with the NIC drivers (or the
TCP/IP stack, I forget which) in an unusual way. IIRC it made me think it
acted like a “special AOL loopback adapter that allows
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andrew S. Bakerasbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows 3.0
system to get onto the Internet? :)
Trumpet Winsock!
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
[mailto:david@nwea.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:34 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to support
AOL clients I found its software seemed to bind with the NIC drivers (or the
TCP/IP stack, I forget which
That was what I remembered. I preferred WFW better.
Jon
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andrew S. Bakerasbz...@gmail.com wrote:
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows
3.0
system to get
Trumpet!
Altho I just used WfW.
-sc
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:charles.whi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
LAN Workplace?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who remembers
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows 3.0
system to get onto the Internet? :)
-ASB
m...@d himem sk1llz?
-sc
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
sure, specific questions or just a flashback ? g Wasn't there a
stack with a lizard type logo ?
we had Windows 3.0 running
Oh,and are you thinking of Chamelon?
-sc
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
m...@d himem sk1llz?
-sc
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07
, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Trumpet!
Altho I just used WfW.
-sc
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:charles.whi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
LAN Workplace?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
_
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
m...@d himem
QEMM: yes.
DesqVIEW: meh.
HP NewWave!
-sc
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc
Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
_
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
--
*From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 07, 2009
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
QEMM: yes.
DesqVIEW: meh.
HP NewWave!
-sc
From: Phillip Partipilo [mailto:p...@psnet.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
Phillip
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
QEMM: yes.
DesqVIEW: meh.
HP NewWave!
-sc
From
: AOL
Trumpet!
Altho I just used WfW.
-sc
From: Charles Whitby [mailto:charles.whi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
LAN Workplace?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Who
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
sure, specific questions or just a flashback ? g Wasn't there a
stack with a lizard type logo ?
we had Windows 3.0 running with the NetWare stack *and* the TCP/IP stack
... back when upper memory management was a valued skill g, uphill,
in the snow, both ways
manager..bleech
*From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 07, 2009 8:55 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: AOL
sure, specific questions or just a flashback ? g Wasn't there a stack
with a lizard type logo ?
we had Windows 3.0 running
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Worst job I ever had back then was to try to get boxes with 2 NICs (Vines
Netware) and a 5250 emulation card
as long as it wasn't on an IBM.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
You could do that? I thought that was impossible.
Jon
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Free, Bob r...@pge.com wrote:
Worst
What would he do if you gave him an EISA card?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Erik Goldoffegold...@gmail.com wrote:
... my job
]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
What would he do if you gave him an EISA card?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On Fri, Aug 7
On 7 Aug 2009 at 11:43, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows
3.0 system to get onto the Internet? :)
I do, unfortunately. Trumpet Winsock, ISTR using that one ...
--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
On 7 Aug 2009 at 12:08, Phillip Partipilo wrote:
Anyone cool was using QEMM and Desqview/386!
I once bought a used HDD at a local swipe-meet and to my surprise it had QEMM
and DV loaded on it, registered to another local consultant whom I knew. Gave
him a hard time about not wiping the disk
Kinda like our PC's with TwinAx and AppleTalk cards.
Ick.
-sc
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Worst job I ever had back then was to try to get boxes with 2 NICs
(Vines Netware) and a 5250
Bingo. Most of the 5250 cards had TwinAx connections so the
cabling/terminations were one more variable in getting to damn things to
work.
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 12:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Kinda like
I *knew* saving that board for 20 years would come in handy eventually!
;-)
Yeah, well my wife never agrees with me on that... :)
-ASB
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Erik Goldoffegold...@gmail.com wrote:
... my job
Yep... Good ol' trumpet.
-ASB
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.comwrote:
On 7 Aug 2009 at 11:43, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows
3.0 system to get onto the Internet? :)
I do,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Free, Bobr...@pge.com wrote:
Bingo. Most of the 5250 cards had TwinAx connections so the
cabling/terminations were one more variable in getting to damn things to
work.
How about BNC 10BASE2? Nothing like having the entire LAN go down
because some luser
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to support
AOL clients I found its software seemed to bind with the NIC drivers (or the
TCP/IP stack, I forget which) in an unusual way. IIRC it made me think it
acted like a “special
Groan. One word. Arcnet.
At one stage, we started putting a bead of solder between the T-piece
and the male connector so that they could only remove the T from the NIC.
--
Peter van Houten
On the 07/08/2009 22:40, Ben Scott wrote the following:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Free,
Thinnet FTL.
Where'd the terminator go??
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Free, Bobr...@pge.com wrote:
Bingo. Most of the 5250 cards
07, 2009 2:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Erik Goldoffegold...@gmail.com wrote:
... my job was to install the IBM ISA Token Ring Adapters so that all
three would behave together
Hah! I *just today* brought in an old VGA card with 8-bit ISA
: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 8:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
Who remembers the original TCP/IP stack you could install on a Windows 3.0
system to get onto the Internet? :)
-ASB
---
http://Home.ASBzone.com/ASB/
http
Still got a bunch dunno why really.
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Think I finally threw out all my old ISA cards a month or two ago ...
And
yep, had some
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Think I finally threw out all my old ISA cards a month or two ago ...
And
yep, had some video, ethernet, token ring, sound blaster, etc...
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks
Heh. I remember having to solder 72 Ohm resistors into terminators and then
having to test them.
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
Groan. One word. Arcnet.
At one
didn't have the heart to rebuild it. L
John-AldrichTile-Tools
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:angu...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On 5 Aug 2009 at 22:49, Sean Houston wrote:
I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL
...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Yeah, I remember the good old days of Fight-O-Net J I was 1:362/669. I
couldn't get the neighbor of the beast so I at least got the 'down the
street from the beast' node address. J
Angus Scott-Fleming angu...@geoapps.com wrote on 08/06/2009 12:10:36
AM:
On 5 Aug 2009 at 22:49, Sean Houston wrote:
I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL being the main 3 companies
around. I
can't say I was ever aware they were ever known as anything but
AOHell.
Fidonet all the
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM, John
Aldrichjaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
I was 1:362/669.
I used to co-sysop for Computer Castle 1:324/127. RemoteAccess/Pro.
20 lines, each with a dedicated clunker PC, all booting from floppy
and then running diskless against a NetWare server. Said
[mailto:angu...@geoapps.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:11 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: AOL
On 5 Aug 2009 at 22:49, Sean Houston wrote:
I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL being the main 3 companies around. I
can't say I was ever aware they were ever known as anything but AOHell
it.
Finally, I told her I'd put it in her Favorites folder.
From: david@nwea.org
To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:07:53 -0700
Subject: RE: AOL
When I get asked to work on a home user PC with AOL I let them
know up front *I DO NOT SUPPORT AOL
: RE: AOL
I had to visit a doctor's office (office would dial in remotely to the
hospital) because she said the link (url) to our RAS wasn't working. Got there
and she's running AOL (and she has broadband, too). Every freakin' time I
tried to put a shortcut on her desktop to the RAS, AOL would
Ayup.
About as badly as the original NetWare client for Win95 did...
-sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AOL
Yep sounds right. In my experience when I used to actually try to
support AOL
On 5 Aug 2009 at 22:49, Sean Houston wrote:
I remember Compuserve, Prodigy and AOL being the main 3 companies around. I
can't say I was ever aware they were ever known as anything but AOHell.
Fidonet all the way, baby I ran a BBS for many years. I think I still
have the 386 it was
72 matches
Mail list logo
