RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread David Lum
I use VM's whenever possible, even if it's a 1:1. Moves/upgrades are simply much easier. I'd run 2VM's if licensing isn't an issue. Dave -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Kennedy, Jim
, February 26, 2013 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Servers in remote locations I use VM's whenever possible, even if it's a 1:1. Moves/upgrades are simply much easier. I'd run 2VM's if licensing isn't an issue. Dave -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk

RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Michael B. Smith
I've recently helped a company build out several branch offices and one to deploy a remote datacenter. We virtualized everything. Absolutely everything. -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:24 PM To: NT System Admin

RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Art DeKneef
unlimited based on the specs of your hardware. -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Servers in remote locations Yea, run VM's. No reason not to and lots of little reasons

Re: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Steven Peck
We have two ESXi hosts and an external drive array for even the small offices with 1-3 guests. Windows 2012 wasn't out in the release cycle for hardware refresh and we have a large ESXi install base now. We're looking at HyperV but change is slow if at all :) Getting Engineers onsite if there

RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Jon Harris
Personally I would go the one physical running Hyper-V and two virtual servers splitting the work. Unless you prefer to go the VMware route and do the same. I would take the free version of VMware and save the money. I have never had or heard of any good experiences with running a

RE: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Ken Schaefer
I probably sound like a broken record, but what requirements and constraints do you have? E.g. I did a project to deploy something like this to ~600 branch sites. In that case, the SCCM, AD, File Print and Wintel teams are all separate, so that was a key consideration in designing the end

Re: Servers in remote locations

2013-02-26 Thread Don Ely
I'll add that if you can... Look into the Cisco 3945. You can put a UCS blade with plenty of RAM, disk and processor, 48 port POE switch and T1, ADSL or 4g cards in it. I call it network in a box or NIB. Sweet setup and simplifies things. On Feb 26, 2013 11:53 AM, Andrew S. Baker