That actually makes sense because I am not sure the gnu that it was compiled
with but I think it is different. I have since compiled gcc myself, then
python, and atlas libraries. Then I tried to install numpy. It go tthrough
the install no worries and found the correct libraries. It stuffed when I
I'll answer my own question. It was a mix of using two different fortran
compilers so specified the option: python setup.py config_fc
--fcompiler=gfortran build.
All seems to be going well now.
On 07/08/2011 05:35 PM, Jeffrey Spencer wrote:
That actually makes sense because I am not sure the
Hi Travis,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to first apologize for stepping into this discussion a bit late and
for not being able to participate adequately. However, I want to offer a
couple of perspectives, and my opinion
How does this match up with the recently announced release of ETS-4.0? Are the
versions of the python modules the same?
On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:37 AM, Ilan Schnell wrote:
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that EPD (Enthought Python Distribution)
version 7.1 has been released. The most
On 07/08/2011 07:15 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi Travis,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Travis Oliphantoliph...@enthought.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I want to first apologize for stepping into this discussion a bit late and
for not being able to participate adequately. However, I want to
I'm not sure what you mean, when you ask if the Python modules
are the same. EPD 7.1 includes ETS 4.0.
- Ilan
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Robert Love rblove_li...@comcast.net wrote:
How does this match up with the recently announced release of ETS-4.0? Are
the versions of the python
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The one thing that we do need now is the code that implements the small
set of core ideas (array creation and simple numerical operations).
Hopefully that will provide a better grasp
On 07.07.2011, at 7:16PM, Robert Pyle wrote:
.../Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/numeric.py:1922:
RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in absolute
return all(less_equal(absolute(x-y), atol + rtol * absolute(y)))
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:59 PM, James Bergstra
bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM, James Bergstra bergs...@iro.umontreal.ca
wrote:
In numpy 1.5.1, the functions PyArray_MoveInto
Den 07.07.2011 15:24, skrev Yoshi Rokuko:
thank you for pointing that out!
so how do you change your numpy related c code now, would you like to share?
Regardless or memory layout, we can always access element array[i,j,k]
like this:
const int s0 = array-strides[0];
const int s1 =
Den 07.07.2011 14:10, skrev Jens Jørgen Mortensen:
So, this means I can't count on new arrays being C-contiguous any more.
I guess there is a good reason for this.
Work with linear algebra (LAPACK) caused excessive and redundant array
transpositions. Arrays would be transposed from C to
On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The one thing that we do need now is the code that implements the small
set of core ideas (array creation and simple numerical
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The one thing that we do need now is the code that
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
Just checking - but is this:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Bruce
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/08/2011 08:58 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
Just
Hi Bruce,
I'm replying on the list instead of on github, to make it easier for
others to join in the discussion if they want. [For those joining in:
this was a comment posted at https://gist.github.com/1068264 ]
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, bsouthey wrote:
I presume missing float values
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To expose
this with a reasonable interface, I added a function np.copyto, which takes
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To
expose this with a reasonable
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To
expose this with a reasonable
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously to the corresponding unmasked functions. To expose
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and
Sorry, looks like I forgot to rebase against master as Chuck pointed out.
-Mark
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
I've just made pull request 105:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/105
This adds public API PyArray_MaskedCopyInto and PyArray_MaskedMoveInto,
which behave analogously
25 matches
Mail list logo
