On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use
Github issues, then together with IPython we can really be a voice that
helps Github. I will propose to NumFOCUS that the Foundation sponsor
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use
Github issues, then together with IPython we can really be a
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with Ralf's
current list of preferences as:
1)
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI service,
please speak up and let your voice be heard. There is still time to make a
difference in what we are setting up.
Hi all,
What about
01.05.2012 08:52, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
3. No attachments for issues (screenshots, supporting documents, etc.).
Having API access to data won't help you here.
Using gists and references to gists can overcome this. Also using an
attachment service like http://uploading.com/ or
Hello,
with my Debian hat one I'd surely like to give it a go - do you have
any plan to release a tarball for a RC (given the implication of numpy
on the distro, I can't test anything else)? what do you expect to be
the release date for 1.6.2? I asked this to understand the impact, due
to the
Hi Chris,
Try sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy to install the dependencies for
building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional dependencies
as well.
HTH,
Keith
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI service,
please speak up and let your voice be heard. There is still time to
make
a difference in what
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI
service,
please speak up and let
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have a
look at those PRs to see and comment on what's proposed
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Antony Lee antony@berkeley.edu wrote:
With bytes fields, genfromtxt(dtype=None) sets the sizes of the fields to
the largest number of chars (npyio.py line 1596), but it doesn't do the
same for unicode fields, which is a pity. See example below.
I tried to
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 20:24, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Sandro Tosi matrixh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
with my Debian hat one I'd surely like to give it a go - do you have
any plan to release a tarball for a RC (given the implication of
Sure, I will. Right now my solution is to use genfromtxt once with bytes
and auto-dtype detection, then modify the resulting dtype, replacing bytes
with unicodes, and use that new dtypes for a second round of genfromtxt. A
bit awkward but that gets the job done.
Antony Lee
2012/5/1 Charles R
With a little work, I think numpy/scipy could be very useful to those
of us who have to program on .NET for one reason or another, but
64-bit is currently not supported (at least, not as released).
I'm considering working out 64-bit support, but it appears to me like
the numpy-refactor repository
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Hi folks,
sorry for not jumping in before, swamped with deadlines...
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I've been pretty impressed with the lemonade that the IPython folks have
made out of what I see as pretty limiting shortcomings of the github
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis
On 5/1/12 3:19 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
But if you do decide to go with GHI, it should be based on what the
system is like*today*, not on the hope that it will get better.
About a month ago they broke label filtering by turning multi-label
filters into an OR operation, which effectively
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have
a look at those PRs to see and comment on what's proposed to go into 1.6.2.
I also have a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have
a look at those
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
This example indicates that basing your decision on what it is like
*today* may not be valid either. You'd hope that they won't do
Very true ;)
Anyway, like everyone else has said, Ralf, Pauli, et. al. are really
Thanks Ralf,
I agree that Pauli and David have a lot of say in what we do. Thanks for
reminding.We will wait to hear from them. If together you three feel like
we should set up a separate Redmine instance than we can do that and just pay
special attention with the Github integration
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
The main problem with Github (besides the issues/PRs thing and no
attachments, which I can live with) is that to make it work we'll have
to religiously label everything. And because users aren't allowed to
attach labels, it will require a larger
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Hi all,
Charles has done a great job of backporting a lot of bug fixes to 1.6.2,
see PRs 260, 261, 262 and 263. For those who are interested, please have
a look at those
Pauli Virtanen pav at iki.fi writes:
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI
service,
please speak up and let your voice be heard. There
So, I'm working on Buildbot and ShiningPanda from the community side, but am
always ready to step aside if someone else has time :)
Keep it up. Your input and feedback is invaluable. Plus, in this kind of
situation, the more the merrier. There are a lot of different agents to test
Keith Hughitt keith.hughitt at gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris,
Try sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy to install the dependencies for
building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional dependencies
as well.
Thanks for that, but I'd already tried it and found the same failures.
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Chris Ball ceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Pauli Virtanen pav at iki.fi writes:
01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti:
Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012:
If you have particular reasons why we should choose a
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some luck, I've possibly hit on what
was ailing the Tracs (max_diff_bytes
Hi all,
I'm now installing Python 2.7.3 and NumPy 1.6.1
on clean-installed CentOS 6.2.
At first, I installed Python as below:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-shared
make
make install
vi /etc/ld.so.conf #add /usr/local/lib
/sbin/ldconfig
and successfully installed NumPy.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some luck,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Chris Ball ceb...@gmail.com wrote:
Keith Hughitt keith.hughitt at gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris,
Try sudo apt-get build-dep python-numpy to install the dependencies for
building NumPy. I believe it will install all of the optional
dependencies
as well.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
based.
Github issues does have full-text search, and up until now I haven't
really had too many problems with it. No sophisticated
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
based.
Github issues does have full-text search, and up
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe searching issues and pull requests is ok.
The problem is that in statsmodels we did a lot of commits without
pull requests, and I'm not very good searching in git either.
(I don't remember which change I looked for but I got
On 5/1/12 7:24 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not
keyword/tag based. I've found some trac tickets with google on occasion,
although not by initial intent.
I use google to search the sage trac these days, using a shortcut to
limit search
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some
40 matches
Mail list logo
