Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.12.x branched

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Matti Picus wrote: > On 07/11/16 10:19, numpy-discussion-requ...@scipy.org wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:56:12 +0100 >> From: Sebastian Berg >> To:numpy-discussion@scipy.org >> Subject: Re:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __numpy_ufunc__

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> For

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.12.x branched

On 07/11/16 10:19, numpy-discussion-requ...@scipy.org wrote: Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 17:56:12 +0100 From: Sebastian Berg To:numpy-discussion@scipy.org Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.12.x branched Message-ID:<1478451372.3875.5.ca...@sipsolutions.net>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __numpy_ufunc__

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > I'm interested in this, but was never able to dive in to the lengthy > discussions on this. I'm curious if there is a summary of the current > state of things somewhere that I could read to catch up. Old proposal,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __numpy_ufunc__

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> For those interested in continuing the __numpy_ufunc__ saga, there is a pull >> request enabling it