[Numpy-discussion] [REL] matplotlib v2.0.0

Folks, We are happy to announce the release of (long delayed) matplotlib 2.0! This release completely overhauls the default style of the plots. The source tarball and wheels for Mac, Win, and manylinux for python 2.7, 3.4-3.6 are available on pypi pip install --upgrade matplotlib and conda

[Numpy-discussion] question about long doubles on ppc64el

Folks, Over at h5py we are trying to get a release out and have discovered (via debian) that on ppc64el there is an apparent disagreement between the size of a native long double according to hdf5 and numpy. For all of the gorey details see: https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/817 . In short,

[Numpy-discussion] [REL] matplotlib 2.0.0rc2

Folks, We are happy to announce matplotlib v2.0.0rc2 ! Please re-distribute this widely. This is the final planned release candidate for the long awaited mpl v2.0 release. For the full details of what is new please see http://matplotlib.org/2.0.0rc2/users/whats_new.html Some of the

[Numpy-discussion] cycler v.0.10.0 released

Folks, I am happy to announce the next release of Cycler. This will become the minimal version for the upcoming mpl v2.0 release. http://matplotlib.org/cycler/ Feature release for `cycler`. This release includes a number of new features: - `Cycler` objecst learned to generate an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

The test data for mpl is available as a sperate conda package, matplotlib-tests. The reason for splitting it is 40Mb of tests images. Tom On Thu, Feb 4, 2016, 09:09 Pauli Virtanen wrote: > 04.02.2016, 07:56, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: > [clip] > > Whoops, got distracted talking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removiing 1.10.0 and 1.10.1 from sourceforge and pypi

I would also vote for leaving them up. On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:21 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumFOCUS fiscal sponsorship agreement

+1 to posting it as part of the documentation. I also like the idea of numfocus hosting the whole collection of them locally so that we can just link to them. On Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 19:01 Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Ralf Gommers

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Numpy for data manipulation

I would suggest %matplotlib notebook It will still have to a nice png, but you get an interactive figure when it is live. I agree that making the example code Python3 is critical. Tom On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:05 PM Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015

Re: [Numpy-discussion] composition of the steering council (was Re: Governance model request)

To respond to the devils advocate: Creating this organizational framework is a one time boot-strapping event. You could use wording like "The initial council will include those who have made significant contributions to numpy in the past and want to be on it" or "The initial council will be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] composition of the steering council (was Re: Governance model request)

e worked on the core code, but is a major > > player in the community, perhaps as the leader of a Numpy-dependent > > project. This would provide representation for the broad community. > > Pointing out features of the current draft again for reference: In the > current text, the &q

[Numpy-discussion] First release candidate for the 1.5.0 series

Please give it a try! (linux64 conda builds are available on the tacaswell anaconda.org channel) https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/releases/tag/v1.5.0rc1 This release contains many new features. The highlights include: - the object oriented API will now automatically re-draw the