On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:30 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> Having more sampling schemes would be useful, but it's not possible to
> implement sampling schemes with impossible properties.
>
>
>
> BTW: sampling 3
Related to https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/6336?
23.01.2017 14:40 пользователь "David Cournapeau"
написал:
> Hi there,
>
> While building the latest scipy on top of numpy 1.11.3, I have noticed
> crashes while running the scipy test suite, in scipy.special (e.g. in
>
Hi there,
While building the latest scipy on top of numpy 1.11.3, I have noticed
crashes while running the scipy test suite, in scipy.special (e.g. in
scipy.special hyp0f1 test).. This only happens on windows for python 3.5
(where we use MSVC 2015 compiler).
Applying some violence to distutils,
Indeed. I wrongly assumed that since gholke's wheels did not crash, they
did not run into that issue.
That sounds like an ABI issue, since I suspect intel math library supports
C99 complex numbers. I will add info on that issue then,
David
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Evgeni Burovski <
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM Nadav Har'El wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:30 PM, wrote:
>>>
Having more sampling schemes would be useful, but it's not
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 PM, aleba...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> 2017-01-23 15:33 GMT+01:00 Robert Kern :
>
>>
>> I don't object to some Notes, but I would probably phrase it more like we
>> are providing the standard definition of the jargon term
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>
> > As for the standardness of the definition: I don't know, have you a
> reference where it is defined? More natural to me would be to have a list
> of items with integer multiplicities (as in: "cat" 3 times, "dog" 1
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:34 PM Robert Kern wrote:
>>
>> I don't object to some Notes, but I would probably phrase it more like
we are providing the standard definition of the jargon
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:52 PM, aleba...@gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>> 2017-01-23 15:33 GMT+01:00 Robert Kern :
>>>
>>> I don't object to some Notes, but I would probably phrase it
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:34 PM Robert Kern wrote:
> I don't object to some Notes, but I would probably phrase it more like we
> are providing the standard definition of the jargon term "sampling without
> replacement" in the case of non-uniform probabilities. To my mind
2017-01-23 15:33 GMT+01:00 Robert Kern :
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Anne Archibald
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:13 PM Nadav Har'El wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:30 PM,
11 matches
Mail list logo