On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM,
Thanks Ralf! I'm interested in unattended/silent installations.
My best,
Dave
---
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:48:36 +0200
From: Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Command-line options for (Windows)
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to
give our users
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Ralf! I'm interested in unattended/silent installations.
I'm afraid that that doesn't work. NSIS installers provide the /S option
for silent installs, but it requires some changes to the install script
that we
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
dissolved itself in favor of governance directly by the consensus of
the people
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib
promises a list of functions
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word consensus
come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux is Linus' private tree. Everything that goes in is his decision,
everything that stays out is his decision. Of course, he
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in
master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
that were compiled against one version of numpy and then used with a
different version.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Right, this part is specifically about ABI compatibility, not API
compatibility -- segfaults would only occur for extension libraries
that were
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Paul Hobson pmhob...@gmail.com wrote:
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread or place to share this information. I've
been meaning to participate in the discussion for a long
Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
googled up in a few moments, in which Linus yells at people for trying
to submit a
Thank you very much for contributing this description.It is very helpful to
see how people use numpy.ma in the wild.
-Travis
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Paul Hobson wrote:
Travis et al,
This isn't a reply to anything specific in your email and I apologize
if there is a better thread
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Linux: Technically, everything you say is true. In practice, good luck
convincing Linus or a subsystem maintainer to accept your patch when
other people are raising substantive complaints. Here's an email I
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Right now we are trying to balance difficult things: stable releases with
experimental development.
Perhaps a more formal development release system could help here.
IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things: the latest
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the even-numbered as
stable.
That makes some sense.What do others think?
-Travis
On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the
even-numbered as stable.
That makes some sense.What do others think?
I'm starting to think that a fork might be the
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to think that a fork might be the best solution to the present
problem.
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
That is an excellent thought.
We could make the odd numbered releases experimental and the even-numbered
as stable.
That makes some sense. What do others think?
I think the concern with that is manpower: it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za wrote:
If you are referring to the traditional concept of a fork, and not to
the type we frequently make on GitHub, then I'm surprised that no one
has objected already. What would a fork solve? To paraphrase the
regexp
27 matches
Mail list logo
