Thanks for censoring the u!
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 3:07 PM Justin Lawson
wrote:
> ha why the f*ck is everyone so sensitive about that comment? i guess my
> tone didnt come through the original email of just being excited for you
> guys to record it having so many
Thanks for censoring the u!
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 3:07 PM Justin Lawson
wrote:
> ha why the f*ck is everyone so sensitive about that comment? i guess my
> tone didnt come through the original email of just being excited for you
> guys to record it having so many people there and it actually
ha why the f*ck is everyone so sensitive about that comment? i guess my
tone didnt come through the original email of just being excited for you
guys to record it having so many people there and it actually calling. calm
down guys. make birding great again.
--
Justin Lawson
Worcester, MA
--
ha why the fuck is everyone so sensitive about that comment? i guess my
tone didnt come through the original email of just being excited for you
guys to record it having so many people there and it actually calling. calm
down guys. make birding great again.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM Andrew
ha why the fuck is everyone so sensitive about that comment? i guess my
tone didnt come through the original email of just being excited for you
guys to record it having so many people there and it actually calling. calm
down guys. make birding great again.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM Andrew
Well what can I say, we New Yorkers are a tad slow. If you check previous
posts, you would have read where attempts have been made to obtain audio. We
will continue to try for audio and hopefully soon we could impress you?
Otherwise we will just default to those fine NY birders to make the
Well what can I say, we New Yorkers are a tad slow. If you check previous
posts, you would have read where attempts have been made to obtain audio. We
will continue to try for audio and hopefully soon we could impress you?
Otherwise we will just default to those fine NY birders to make the
i thought i read (i did) that it was vocalizing. on my way.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:26 PM Lynne Hertzog
wrote:
> Justin,
> It's not vocalizing.
> Perhaps you should come here and show us how.
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:34 PM Justin Lawson
>
i thought i read (i did) that it was vocalizing. on my way.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:26 PM Lynne Hertzog
wrote:
> Justin,
> It's not vocalizing.
> Perhaps you should come here and show us how.
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:34 PM Justin Lawson
> wrote:
>
> all these birders and no audio out
Justin,
It's not vocalizing.
Perhaps you should come here and show us how.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:34 PM Justin Lawson
wrote:
> all these birders and no audio out yet? took 1 hour for a Hammonds we had
> here last month in Massachusetts.
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:16
Justin,
It's not vocalizing.
Perhaps you should come here and show us how.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:34 PM Justin Lawson
wrote:
> all these birders and no audio out yet? took 1 hour for a Hammonds we had
> here last month in Massachusetts.
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:16 PM Thomas Fiore wrote:
all these birders and no audio out yet? took 1 hour for a Hammonds we had
here last month in Massachusetts.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:16 PM Thomas Fiore wrote:
> Saturday, 10 December, 2016 -
>
> an Empidonax genus, species T-B-D? northern-most Manhattan (NYC)
>
>
>
>
all these birders and no audio out yet? took 1 hour for a Hammonds we had
here last month in Massachusetts.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:16 PM Thomas Fiore wrote:
> Saturday, 10 December, 2016 -
>
> an Empidonax genus, species T-B-D? northern-most Manhattan (NYC)
>
>
>
> Thanks to aII for
13 matches
Mail list logo