There are a few issues to consider, but I would definitely go down the
cookies / javascript road rather than using HTTP redirects.
ie.
- PHP does geolocation lookup and saves country to a cookie
- Page loads, javascript reads the cookie and redirects if it needs to
Try to make the .co.nz and
I didn't check their website. This is what I received:
Just letting you know we have launched a new “Micro” Virtual Server.
This gives you a server hosting environment, with managed backups and
99.99% uptime for less than $100 per month.
Perfect for those project sites that need a server,
Go to SiteHost. Get a VPS just as good for about $30/month.
---
Keri Henare
[e]k...@henare.co.nz
[m]021 874 552
[w]www.kerihenare.com
On 15/04/2009, at 7:43 PM, Jochen Daum wrote:
I didn't check their website. This is what I
You could also provide some client side validation to stop the vast
majority of users submitting the form with an understrength password
in the first place.
On Apr 14, 5:32 pm, Berend de Boer ber...@pobox.com wrote:
Jochen == Jochen Daum j...@automatem.co.nz writes:
Jochen Can I control
Thanks Harvey, that's what we're currently doing, and looks like the
safeest search engine route to take.
I guess if our adwords and organic work are targetted correctly, users
should end up at the right site anyway to minimise any internal tax
issues.
Cheers,
-Dan
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at
I've just had a quick look at smtp.com and from what I can see their
highest plan, Executive, only allows for 600 messages per day.
Doesn't seem like they want to handle 25,000 messages in one go!
On Apr 15, 4:52 pm, Dan Khan dan.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this is not answering what you
Take a look at Auth SMTP
http://www.authsmtp.com/auth-smtp/pricing.html
- Original Message -
From: Super Steve bitban...@gmail.com
To: NZ PHP Users Group nzphpug@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:14 AM
Subject: [phpug] Re: Sending Bulk Email Options
I've just had a
You mean sitehost.co.nz?
I've just had a look at their terms and they have a clause that says:
You are responsible for ensuring that your use of the Service does
not consume excessive system or network resources that disrupts the
normal use of the Service through, but not limited to, spawning
Which brings us back to Campaign Monitor ;)
---
Keri Henare
[e]k...@henare.co.nz
[m]021 874 552
[w]www.kerihenare.com
On 16/04/2009, at 10:20 AM, Super Steve wrote:
You mean sitehost.co.nz?
I've just had a look at their terms and
Yup, it's looking more and more like I really should be using
something like Campaign Monitor or Mail Chimp.
On Apr 16, 10:21 am, Keri Henare keri.mailingli...@henare.co.nz
wrote:
Which brings us back to Campaign Monitor ;)
---
Keri Henare
I was using smtp.com through one of their partner services interspire.smtp.com
They didn't have any obvious daily relay limit, but there is a monthly
one. Also looking at their site now, looks like there's a 15% bounce
threshold before they consider temporarily blacklisting you.
They have plans
It's a little more complicated than that. As a contractor, you are not entitled
to holidays, sick leave, etc (unless specified in contract).
Also, it is easier to get rid of a contractor than a full time employee
You should be getting paid considerably more as a contractor than a full time
Hi,
NOT LEGAL ADVICE
If you sign up under the pretense of still being an employee, it is
probably likely that you will be able to still claim personal
grievance and all the other employee stuff, even if you sign this.
Likely IRD will also be able to collect PAYE from him. Paperwork
means
+1 - be very wary of such a move. Basically they can treat you like a
business, not an employee and can flick you off without much fuss.
This change stacks things in your employers favour. Get professional
advice and don;t be afraid to push back - you have a legal right to.
(I've seen amazing
(I've seen amazing things happen when the words personal grievance
were used)
Oops, I hope positive amazing things happen now.
Jochen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
To post, send email to
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:19:44 Paul Bennett wrote:
This change stacks things in your employers favour. Get professional
advice and don;t be afraid to push back - you have a legal right to.
Legal right and what's astute/career enhancing are two different things.
I doubt that there is anyone on
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:20:57 Jochen Daum wrote:
(I've seen amazing things happen when the words personal grievance
were used)
Oops, I hope positive amazing things happen now.
Yes. Embrace the opportunity and ignore the naysayers.
Generally-
1. Independent contractors can take on other
i think it really depends on two factors:1) how much does he pay more to
counter balance your risks (look at how much a contractor normally charges
for comparable work)
2) are you willing to loose your secure position as an employee and try to
get an idea for the motivation behind the move of
Whoops... ignore my last email! Ironically the first email that Steve sent
and a few other subsequent ones were spammed by my Outlook when some
weren't, so I hadn't read the entire of Steve's email and saw that he had
already considered mailchimp.
Although Steve, if you had considered the cost
Already touched on by David, but do spend time considering the tax benefits
of such a move.
As a contracter, you will be able to claim expenses such as commuting to
work, laptops, PC's and internet connection at home, as well as
rent/mortgage and home office expenses if you do work from home.
Thanks for suggestions.
I *think* his idea is keep the salary the same and move me to contact
job. He has given the proposal to everyone.
I'm going to talk to my employer and legal adviser but if I'm getting
the same salary, I'm not going to take the proposal :)
On Apr 16, 12:11 pm,
First and foremost, clarify what your employer is proposing in detail.
- Original Message -
From: ctrl@gmail.com
To: NZ PHP Users Group nzphpug@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:30 PM
Subject: [phpug] Re: Full time employee to fixed contractor
Thanks for
While nothing will change in terms of the relationships we have, it's simply
a change in terminology and the way you earn money.
I don't think my employer will bump up my salary (or should I say,
rate?)
I think you have to ask why your employer wants to change your
conditions of
Lots of good advice here.
To clarify my previous post, I was once owed a significant amount of
salary from an otherwise well-meaning employer. My efforts to have it
paid out to me failed until I got the advice of an HR friend. The next
day I laid a formal letter on my employers desk stating that
Whether the IRD will consider the sub_contractor as an employee or not
depends on the arrangment you have with him/her.
For example, if the subbie provides their own equipment workspace,
they
decide what hours they work etc, then they will be considered to be a
contractor.
IRD relies
You should really be discussing this with your fellow employees
because obviously if the employer wants to benefit from this then all
should be in agreement in order for the employer to benefit from it.
If some stay as employees and some as contractors then the employer
will only have created
I move in the opposite direction about a year ago. Having already
worked as a contractor for a year for one company a asked to be made
an employee. I much prefer the certainty and legal protection and
thought it was worth taking the pay cut.
It’s your call but companies don't turn everyone in to
ctrl == ctrl n x...@gmail com ctrl@gmail.com writes:
ctrl I *think* his idea is keep the salary the same and move me to
ctrl contact job. He has given the proposal to everyone.
ctrl I'm going to talk to my employer and legal adviser but if I'm
ctrl getting the same salary,
28 matches
Mail list logo
