Hi Larry,
It would be better for you to paste the compilation warning and gcc version.
So we can justify if it is deserved to be fixed.
Thanks,
Changwei
On 2018/5/7 11:06 AM, Larry Chen wrote:
> Hi Jun
>
> Yeah,I know your logic is right.
> It's just a compile warning that made me feel
Hi Jun
Yeah,I know your logic is right.
It's just a compile warning that made me feel uncomfortable.
:)
On 05/07/2018 08:52 AM, piaojun wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> 'had_lock' will be initialized by ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(), and the
> 'bail' branch above won't use it either as 'inode_locked' is
Hi Larry,
'had_lock' will be initialized by ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(), and the
'bail' branch above won't use it either as 'inode_locked' is still zero.
thanks,
Jun
On 2018/5/6 17:49, Larry Chen wrote:
> The variable had_lock might be used uninitialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Chen
