Re: [Ocfs2-users] Is this a valid configuration?

2012-12-05 Thread Erik Schwartz
anks, >> Neil >> >> >> ___ >> Ocfs2-users mailing list >> Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com >> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users >> > > > ___ > Ocfs2

Re: [Ocfs2-users] "ls" taking ages on a directory containing 900000 files

2012-12-04 Thread Erik Schwartz
count Block: 0 > > Last Extblk: 0 Orphan Slot: 0 > > Sub Alloc Slot: Global Sub Alloc Bit: 65535 > > > > > > May inline-data or xattr be the source of the problem ? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Description : Des

Re: [Ocfs2-users] Concurrent write performance issues with OCFS2

2012-02-29 Thread Erik Schwartz
device consistently perform at around ~75 MB/sec. That _implies_ that OCFS2's overhead is not bad -- apparently ~10 MB/sec in my environment. I need to work with the SAN storage support. That's another thread. Thanks again for the reply. > On 2/28/2012 9:24 AM, Erik Schwartz wrote

Re: [Ocfs2-users] Concurrent write performance issues with OCFS2

2012-02-28 Thread Erik Schwartz
offsets. This should help figure out how > the shared device works with multiple nodes. > I'm working on a new baseline (both nodes against the block device, with appropriate write offsets) now. I will compare that to the OCFS2 tests. B

[Ocfs2-users] Concurrent write performance issues with OCFS2

2012-02-28 Thread Erik Schwartz
tiation of file locks, and waiting for data to be flushed to journal / disk. My two questions are: 1. Does this dramatic write performance slowdown sound reasonable and expected? 2. Are there any OCFS2-level steps I can take to improve this situation? Thanks - -- Erik Schwartz | GPG ke