Søren Hauberg wrote:
ons, 05 03 2008 kl. 16:41 +, skrev Bateman David-ADB014:
[snip]
or make mailman hold messages from unsubscribed users prior to posting them,
which will increase the overhead on the moderaters of the list. I suppose the
last would be acceptable, but maybe some more list
dbateman wrote:
Seems fine to me (at least looking at it) and it shouldn't affect the other
functionality, so why not commit it..
Cheers
D.
Søren Hauberg wrote:
I would be willing to integrate it into octave-forge if someone can
give me SVN access etc.
I'll need your sourceforge user
Daniel J Sebald wrote:
PS: This is one slow function. Really bogs down programs working with
a lot of data.
As an example, consider the amount of time on my machine it takes to compute
200 date vectors:
octave:25 S = repmat('2008-12-11', 200, 1);
octave:26 ts = cputime(); datevec(S, '
Thomas Weber wrote:
Hi,
eomdate() calls datenum with vector arguments in its testsuite, which
fails I don't know, is datenum supposed to handle this?
I sent a patch to the list for datevec (which is called by datenum).
That's probably the source of error Thomas.
Dan
Jonathan Kotta wrote:
I have a problem where a vector within a struct is much slower to
index than a plain vector (~8x slower) .
Same results here, 32-bit x86.
Dan
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20,
Martin,
Using depthorder is creative. I'd like to point out that depthorder is only an
approximation to what should be hidden surfaces. I worked on many aspects of
gnuplot. Although gnuplot does have a hidden line algorithm (i.e., it can
break a mesh into line segments--based on
Martin Helm wrote:
I've always felt motivated to write a hidden surface algorithm but hadn't
found the time given how much work that would require. Even the syntax
depthorder would be nice to deprecate, and instead simply refer to it as
hidden.
The problem with a general hidden surface
I've tried the routines ode45 and ode23 recently. For a linear ODE
for which I can compute the analytical solution, I found an 11 to 16%
discrepancy between the numerical and analytical solutions. Granted,
I was working with a stiff ODE, but stability seems fine; it's just
that the solution
Søren Hauberg wrote:
man, 06 04 2009 kl. 21:30 +0200, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
OK, I pushed both functions. I made a few other changes:
For the record: I do not object to these functions being added to core
Octave.
For those not following the Octave-Forge mailing list:
Tony Richardson
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
OK, I pushed both functions. I made a few other changes:
adjusted coding style
renamed polytranslate - polytrans
I was going to suggest a name change, more in next email...
--
This SF.net
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
Maybe we differ slightly in the view of the development archive. IMO
these are just patches that can easily be reverted. I didn't even yet
add the functions to the build process, so that they won't be
installed if someone uses a snapshot - they're just there for
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Thorsten Meyer thorsten.mey...@gmx.de
wrote:
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
Maybe we differ slightly in the view of the development archive. IMO
these are just patches that can easily be reverted. I didn't even yet
add the functions to the build
Philippe Lavoie wrote:
Hi
I tried to execute a script which worked well under Octave 3.0.5, Windows
2008, 64 bits with the latest 3.2.0 and Windows 7.
But I get a core dump.
Who Should I send that dump to?
If there looks to be something meaningful in the core dump, rather than
Wasn't there a discussion recently about a games package in response to a
script someone sent in? This would make two such scripts, enough for a package.
Dan
Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
hi all,
if you ever needed to draw n random numbers from 1:6 in your script,
this function is for you.
OK,
A few comments: There's nothing wrong with a library function having some code
that sets graphics properties. On the other hand, the issue may ultimately go
back to the level of the graphics driver, and a MarkerSize of 12 for one driver
may look different for that of another driver. If the
Simon Schwarz wrote:
In the version of zplane.m the marker size was set explicitly to 2 I
just changed this value to 12 and added a parameter for it.
I just tried to remove the markersize code - it works also. The markers
are tiny but bigger than before.
That's odd. Perhaps a marker size
Shai Ayal wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Daniel J Sebald daniel.seb...@ieee.org
wrote:
Simon Schwarz wrote:
In the version of zplane.m the marker size was set explicitly to 2 I
just changed this value to 12 and added a parameter for it.
I just tried to remove the markersize code
Simon,
To give closure to this thread. The best approach is probably first get the
latest version of Octave and then modify the graphics settings so that the
defaults look a good size. (Are you working with the gnuplot driver? Some
other graphics driver?)
Dan
Daniel J Sebald wrote:
Shai
Joe Strout wrote:
Lukas Reichlin wrote:
Try installing AquaTerm:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/aquaterm/
That actually did solve it. The AquaTerm bundled inside Gnuplot.app
doesn't work, but this one (installed via AquaTerm.pkg, and then moved
next to Octave.app and Gnuplot.app)
Joe Strout wrote:
Carlo de Falco wrote:
So, it appears as though a complete install of Octave (able to plot)
would include Octave.app, Gnuplot.app, and AquaTerm.app.
Aquaterm is actually not necessary to plot, even when using the Gnuplot
backend.
If you have X11 installed on your mac you
Joe,
The best has always been to compile gnuplot from scratch. It is very easy to
do, barring any missing libraries. But typically those are easy to install or
build as well. Search www.gnuplot.info for instructions.
That way gnuplot will be compiled to better match your system. Plus if
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 3-Jun-2010, Jake wrote:
| 1. Is there a reason why these functions haven't already been implemented?
| Lack of information on the algorithms, perhaps?
Or, given that we have other ODE/DAE solvers that are quite good, no
compelling reason other than compatibility
John W. Eaton wrote:
On 4-Jun-2010, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| On 3-Jun-2010, Jake wrote:
|
| | 1. Is there a reason why these functions haven't already been
implemented?
| | Lack of information on the algorithms, perhaps?
|
| Or, given that we have
On 02/16/2011 01:41 PM, Adel Heiba wrote:
All:
I am trying to install Octave from the precompiled binaries for Mac. I use
the operating system Snow Leopard.
Octave works fine; but, not GNUPLOT. I get the following message when I
invoke Gnuplot from Octave.
dyld: Library not loaded:
[I'm copying the Octave maintainers list because the problem may
originate with the core Octave m-script to tex-file translator.]
On 03/15/2011 08:56 PM, Rob Frohne wrote:
Hi All,
I'm attempting to build a statically linked version of octave 3.4 on
Ubuntu 10.10 so I can move it to a network
On 03/16/2011 01:21 AM, Rob Frohne wrote:
Hi Dan,
I added the \end to get out of tex. It wasn't from munge-texi.
arith-texi-t is empty.
Hmm, well munge-texi is a C++ program:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/919cadf334f8/doc/interpreter/munge-texi.cc
I search for invalid doc
On 03/18/2011 05:26 AM, welkin zzp wrote:
Hello,
I think that there may be some wrong in the contour function which is in
the plot toolbox, as the contour it's show doesn't be uniform with the data.
The following image show the wrong result of a two cells image.
That looks like some kind of
On 03/30/2011 09:16 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
On 03/30/2011 08:45 PM, welkin zzp wrote:
Hi,
When I close a figure window, I observed that the gnuplot and
gnuplot_x11 processes were always in the system,but didn't work, until
quit octave
On 03/31/2011 07:38 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
Dan, my understanding is that there is no mechanism by which Octave
can determine if the gnuplot window has closed. Also there is no
(existing) mechanism to tell gnuplot to exit when its plot window is
closed.
Last night I looked at a few things. I
Wolfgang,
The value in question should actually be a ration of two values, i.e., a
relative measure. Technically, a ratio of two powers, the formula being
10 * log10 (P1/P2). This is the Power version of the formula, and I'm
guessing the value input is P1/P2. For reference, at half power
On 04/27/2011 03:54 AM, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
Hello Dan,
[snip]
Would it be possible to include an implementation of db() in future
releases of Octave?
I'm not a maintainer of packages, but it seems reasonable it should go
in a package in OctaveForge (signal processing?). As you point
Someone submitted a question to OctDev list that seems like it should
fall under gnuplot--something about incompatibility in a dylib
library. The text is here:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=704575DE-4EDB-4C4A-9FF2-D9C599BA3B71%40gmail.comforum_name=octave-dev
Any OS
I haven't analyzed this filter, but generally speaking the poles
theoretically being in the unit circle isn't a guarantee of stability
when it comes time to implement the filter as a difference equation.
When doing so, it is possible that round-off errors nudge those poles,
in actuality,
On 12/05/2011 04:19 PM, Contractor Eran Cohen wrote:
I have recently downloaded Octave 3.2.4 on a Windows-7 machine.
Everything appears to be working properly except for plot and other
related functions. The plot window never gives control to the user, and
I basically have to close it by
On 01/16/2012 11:05 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 01/16/2012 09:32 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
Who uses Octave?
In my research I use a mixture of octave and Mathematica. My
collaborators use Matlab. Results of plots look superficially different
(e.g. line width, colors,
On 02/01/2012 03:13 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
We have confirmed scheduling of an Octave conference for users and
developers on July 16-20 in Montréal, Canada:
http://www.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=OctConf_2012
Interesting. Think about a small proceedings--papers (written
On 03/23/2012 04:36 PM, Jacob Dawid wrote:
I am sorry to say that, but I think that all the discussion about the GUI
is complete non-sense. A GUI is simply a different way to access octave's
functionality that integrates better with the ideas and concepts that a
state-of-the-art program has to
On 03/23/2012 04:55 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
On 03/23/2012 01:20 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
2012/3/23 Daniel J Sebalddaniel.seb...@ieee.org:
One question is whether people are more productive using a GUI
versus a command line
On 03/23/2012 05:29 PM, Jacob Dawid wrote:
I am a software developer and I would not develop code without an IDE. The
point is that behind all that text you type there is a more abstract
concept of your thoughts. If a GUI can replicate you thoughts well it is a
lot faster than the text only
On 03/23/2012 06:02 PM, Robert T. Short wrote:
I wish we would stop using GUI when we mean IDE. GUI could (and should)
also mean the ability to create a graphical interface to a particular
simulation (or whatever you use octave for). Sloppy terminology and
sloppy thinking go together.
Point
On 03/23/2012 06:02 PM, Robert T. Short wrote:
That said, in Microsoft Windows an IDE is the only way to fly. Command
line interfaces are just too clunky and the windows system too inflexible.
Yeah, that's true. Is it a DOS emulator or something these days?
Dan
On 03/23/2012 06:39 PM, J. Luis wrote:
On 23-03-2012 22:55, Clark Dunson wrote:
Mathworks has offered GUI building functionality as part of the product for
a while. If we be Qt, then how to create GUI building in the m-file? Focus
by the core group on devising the GUI/API layer that
On 03/24/2012 06:15 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Michael Goffioul
michael.goffi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean something like this:
figure ('visible', 'off');
plot (...)
Michael.
Thanks Michael,
Can anybody using text based output test that?
It
On 03/24/2012 09:04 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
You need to pass the figure handle. Otherwise each call will create a new
figure. The first will be hidden and the second visible.
The commands below should do what you want.
figure (gcf (), 'visible', 'off');
plot ([1:50]);
On 03/23/2012 01:20 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
2012/3/23 Daniel J Sebalddaniel.seb...@ieee.org:
One question is whether people are more productive using a GUI
versus a command line and an editor like gvim or whatever.
This is irrelevant.
No it's not. Being productive is important.
On 03/25/2012 09:44 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 23 March 2012 19:02, Robert T. Shortoct...@phaselockedsystems.com wrote:
All Jordi was trying to say (I think) was that if we are going to do it,
then we need to quit fussing about the interface, pick a concept that
works, and get on
On 04/26/2012 02:41 PM, PhilipNienhuis [via Octave] wrote:
Timothy Field wrote
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:24 PM, forkandwait [via Octave]
As to .csv:
The latest io package release has csv2cell, which seems to be able to
read mixed numeric/text info in .csv files (a known stumbling
On 04/26/2012 03:06 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
Because csv2cell is somewhat generic, it is also limited. On the other
hand, it isn't too difficult to like a short custom routine that quickly
extracts the data of interest.
Of course not, we all like quick data extraction routines... I meant
On 04/26/2012 04:28 PM, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Daniel J Sebald wrote:
Just a brief comment on saving spreadsheet data as CSV. The thing to be
careful of is when your data might be text fields with commas. For
example, a field like
Sebald, Daniel
could throw off the csv2cell routine so
On 05/07/2012 07:39 PM, James Steward wrote:
On 08/05/12 09:39, James Steward wrote:
Hi,
Regarding the fir1 function and the blackmanharris window;
If I specify an even number of coefficients (n) it produces a symmetric
filter with an odd number of coefficients (n+1).
If I specify an odd
On 05/07/2012 09:26 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:54:16PM -0500, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
Does that produce the result you are expecting James?
But actually both the current and this behavior do not match ML's
blackmanharris function, at least in the version I have at my
On 05/07/2012 10:50 PM, James Steward wrote:
On 08/05/12 13:26, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
[snip]
The above is indicating 5.2057e-01 and 5.2058e-01 for coefficients,
but when I list them in long format, why the rounding occurs isn't
evident. The rounding effect will likely show up somewhere
On 05/10/2012 01:12 AM, Mike Gross wrote:
I had been using my local copy of the blackmanharris function and didn't
realize that my patch was not applied.
I think that the root issue is that the previous implementer of some or
all of the window functions assumed that the periodic output was
On 05/10/2012 07:06 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Daniel J Sebalddaniel.seb...@ieee.org
wrote:
On 05/10/2012 01:12 AM, Mike Gross wrote:
I had been using my local copy of the blackmanharris function and didn't
realize that my patch was not applied.
I think that
On 05/15/2012 06:18 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
Hello, everyone. A few things about OctConf 2012:
I've added a skeleton of a conference schedule:
http://www.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=OctConf_2012#Dates
If you'd like to give a talk, please let me know of the title of your
On 05/16/2012 04:16 AM, Jacob Dawid wrote:
I could do 2 talks, one about Qt in general and one about the Octave GUI in
context with GSoC. That's at least what I could contribute.
Yes, that would be very helpful so we could see how one goes about
modifying the appearance of objects, adds/edits
On 07/13/2012 03:33 PM, C.C.Kling wrote:
Hi,
I just registered as ckling at sourceforge and would like to register as
a octave-forge developer . I would like to submit a bugfix for the
kmeans.m of the statistics package:
In cases where clusters contain only one element, the mean() function
In working with the fftfilt() routine and wanting to know if the inputs
were purely imaginary I wondered why there is no such thing as isimag().
It seems as though it would be as useful as or more useful than
iscomplex().
Here's the thing: iscomplex() appears to be simply the complement of
On 09/07/2012 11:05 PM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
On 09/07/2012 05:30 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
In working with the fftfilt() routine and wanting to know if the
inputs were purely imaginary I wondered why there is no such thing as
isimag(). It seems as though it would be as useful as or more
On 09/08/2012 08:52 PM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
[snip]
And, this may just add to the noise, but a few days ago I created a
vector which was composed
of complex elements, and some real elements, i.e. isreal(x(4)) said 1
and whos x(4) said
it was only 8 bytes.
That is similar to the
On 09/13/2012 06:15 PM, gregid wrote:
I tried to install optim package downloaded from forge website, -forge, and
svn trunk download.
All with the same result. Any advice on how to fix it? Anyone else having
similar problem?
The optim package appears to not have been touched for 3 months, so
On 09/14/2012 06:53 PM, Júlio Hoffimann wrote:
Hi Daniel,
There are three, maybe four levels of Octave code:
1) Core Octave written in C++ (i.e., compiled code)
2) Commonly-used, moderately-general m-scripts (i.e., interpreted code)
3) Compiled or scripted code related to
On 10/09/2012 07:49 PM, Ed Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Daniel J Sebald daniel.seb...@ieee.org
mailto:daniel.seb...@ieee.org wrote:
On 09/06/2012 02:59 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
I'll toss this one to Ed and Rik, since we were just talking about
On 10/21/2012 01:33 AM, f...@star.sr.bham.ac.uk wrote:
On 10/21/2012 1:29 AM, f...@star.sr.bham.ac.uk wrote:
Hello,
After compiling GNU Octave 3.6.3 one of the tests fails with a
segmentation fault and exits. After typing make check the last lines
of
the output are:
On 11/13/2012 08:54 AM, Henque wrote:
Hello,
I've installed octave 3.6.2 on windows XP. And I try to use the function
ginput :
imshow(rand(100))
[x,y]=ginput(1)
But I get this error:
error: feval: function '__qt_ginput__' no found
error: called from:
error:\m\plot\ginput.m at line 41,
On 11/13/2012 01:28 PM, Henque wrote:
Hello Dan,
Thanks for reply me.
My graphics type is a: Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family.
Too precise. :-)
Just to be more precise, I installed this version of octave Octave 3.6.2
for Windows Microsoft Visual Studio.
Octave uses a graphics
On 11/13/2012 02:26 PM, Henque wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the mistake. I've just started working with octave.
First, I installed octave with the default parameters : Toolkit = qt. I
have just uninstalled and reinstalled it but this time I chose Gnuplot as
graphics toolkit and the problem is
On 11/13/2012 02:45 PM, Salva Ardid wrote:
El Dimarts, 13 de novembre de 2012, a les 14:41:09, Daniel J Sebald va
escriure:
On 11/13/2012 02:26 PM, Henque wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the mistake. I've just started working with octave.
First, I installed octave with the default parameters
On 11/13/2012 02:05 PM, Martin Helm wrote:
You run the qthandles toolkit which has no implementation for ginput,
switch to one of the others and try with that
close all
graphics_toolkit fltk
for example at the octave prompt (you may need to close all graphics
before with the close all).
On 11/16/2012 01:38 AM, Surandokht Nikzad wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding symbols in plotting. I wonder about the very
basic one, which is circle 'o'.
When I use this for plotting [plot(x,y,'o')], instead of having circle,
I get triangle shape with a dot in the middle!
What
On 11/16/2012 01:50 AM, Surandokht Nikzad wrote:
The platform is Mac OS X version 10.6.8
The version of octave is 3.4.0
The version of gnuplot is version 4.2.5
Well, those versions go back quite a ways. You might have to upgrade to
something more recent, like octave 3.5.5 or greater. (The
Hi Steven,
Some comments below with regards to Jordi's observations on integration.
On 11/20/2012 03:33 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 4 November 2012 00:34, Steven G. Johnsonstev...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
There is an updated version of my package
(http://ab-initio.mit.edu/Faddeeva)
On 11/20/2012 07:43 PM, Nir Krakauer wrote:
Can the contributed functions be given names that don't conflict with
the current Octave ones, like erf_complex? That way there should be no
problem with putting them either in specfun or as their own Octave
package.
That's an alternative. Yet it
On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Carnë Draug wrote:
On 23 November 2012 19:17, Carnë Draugcarandraug+...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I'm proposing moving the current Octave Forge mailing list
(octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net) to the same server as as the ones
from Octave core. My suggestion is to
On 11/25/2012 01:48 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
On 25 November 2012 19:58, Daniel J Sebalddaniel.seb...@ieee.org wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:47 AM, Carnė Draug wrote:
On 23 November 2012 19:17, Carnė Draugcarandraug+...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I'm proposing moving the current Octave Forge
On 11/25/2012 04:10 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
On 25 November 2012 21:44, Daniel J Sebalddaniel.seb...@ieee.org wrote:
On 11/25/2012 01:48 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
You seem to be confused about what Octave Forge is.
[snip]
I get a lot of email with OctDev tagged onto it (the name OctDev itself
76 matches
Mail list logo
