Re: JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-16 Thread Thomas Mahler
Use ANT. Using ANT to build OJB should work without problems on any platform. Thomas Charles N. Harvey III wrote: I'm having a lot of trouble building from HEAD. Do I use maven or ant? I get the STRANGEST error when I try to use ant. Its probably something with my maven/ant installation

Re: JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-15 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
I'm having a lot of trouble building from HEAD. Do I use maven or ant? I get the STRANGEST error when I try to use ant. Its probably something with my maven/ant installation though. Ok, so, I'm getting there. I'm starting to understand JDO a bit. I hadn't actually looked at it before today.

JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-14 Thread Nicolas Arni-Bloch
Hi all, I want to try JDO with OJB but I have some misunderstood. I am not very clear about where to put the MetaData for the mapping ? In the repository.xml or in the XXX.jdo ? I look in the tutorial5 and I see that information for the mapping are stored in the Product.jdo. So should we put

Re: JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-14 Thread Brian McCallister
You need both if you are using the JDORI plugin. It is annoying =( The native JDO impl I am working on for OJB will allow you to just use the OJB mappings as the .jdo files will only be used for (optional in OJB but not for spec-compliant JDO) bytecode enhancement process. This JDO impl is

Re: JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-14 Thread Charles N. Harvey III
Brian, I _don't_ want to filter my queries. Can I give the native implementation a try? Would that be the CVS Head or would it be a different branch? Thanks. Charlie Brian McCallister wrote: You need both if you are using the JDORI plugin. It is annoying =( The native JDO impl I am working

Re: JDO and OJB newbie Question

2004-04-14 Thread Brian McCallister
You will need CVS HEAD, correct -- also make sure you are comfy looking around the sources to see what is implemented and not. I have tried to throw OperationUnsupportedException(Not yet imeplemented!) when a feature isn't actually implemented yet =) This code is being actively written so it