I'm using 1.0.3 version and default (per broker) cache
yes persistence broker wich fetch folder is different from that one wich
materialize children.
So to prevent this I need touch all objects in single persistence broker
(long-lived caches dont feet me because I'm using web application with
If I cauld say OJB prefetch parent and children
reference in all folders wich I materizalize by this call it
would be more productive
I am slightly confused by this statement. Are you saying you want all
the children to be materialized when the parent is created, thus
populating all of
Clute, Andrew wrote:
If I cauld say OJB prefetch parent and children
reference in all folders wich I materizalize by this call it
would be more productive
I am slightly confused by this statement. Are you saying you want all
the children to be materialized when the parent is created, thus
If I cauld say OJB prefetch parent and children
reference in all folders wich I materizalize by this call
it would be
more productive
I am slightly confused by this statement. Are you saying you
want all
the children to be materialized when the parent is created, thus
Thanks Andrew!
That's what I need ;)
If I cauld say OJB prefetch parent and children
reference in all folders wich I materizalize by this call
it would be
more productive
I am slightly confused by this statement. Are you saying you
want all
the children to
Maksimenko Alexander wrote:
I have tree like structure (with parent,children relationships). I'm
using proxies to lazy materialize them. Everything works well but in
particular cases I have to materialize the whole tree because
folder.getChildren().get(0).getParent() is not the same as folder
Martin Kalén wrote:
Maksimenko Alexander wrote:
I have tree like structure (with parent,children relationships). I'm
using proxies to lazy materialize them. Everything works well but in
particular cases I have to materialize the whole tree because
folder.getChildren().get(0).getParent() is not
' object happen in the same request as when the collection proxy
is 'touched' and forced to be materialized?
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Maksimenko Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:03 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: lazy materialization
Hi!
I have tree like structure (with parent,children relationships). I'm
using proxies to lazy materialize them. Everything works well but in
particular cases I have to materialize the whole tree because
folder.getChildren().get(0).getParent() is not the same as folder and
sometimes it makes
