In my experience constraining the rdf+XML syntax does work well in
making the rdf more palatable for those wanting XML. However, also
from real experience, suggesting consumers use XML tools does the
consumer a dis-service.
Rdf is a graph, a web of relationships, which is what makes it less
Quoting Erik Hetzner ehetz...@gmail.com:
At Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:53:45 -0700,
I?m not sure the distinction here between URI and URL. I think the RDF
Ross is describing is:
M Mahy foaf:page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Mahy .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Mahy
Quoting Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com:
For the wikipedia link, it may also be appropriate to use
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf rather than foaf:page, although there may not be
enough confidence in the integrity of the data to make that
assumption.
That's an interesting distinction. I do like
On 6/8/2010 8:23 PM, Erik Hetzner wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion, RDF is more constraining than XML, because it forces
the designer to think clearly about the underlying model, rather than
presenting a lot of different metadata fields.
Then I will leave it to you to explain to the W3C how the
Quoting Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com:
So, for:
http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL31800A.rdf
You could have something like looks more like:
I'm assuming this is a response to the 2nd draft RDF that I send out,
given the similarities
rdf:RDF
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Lee Passey l...@novomail.net wrote:
So before any questions about how best to represent a person in RDF can
be addressed, you should try to find out who will be consuming the data,
and what their expectations are.
I think this is an important point, and is
Quoting Ed Summers e...@pobox.com:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Lee Passey l...@novomail.net wrote:
So before any questions about how best to represent a person in RDF can
be addressed, you should try to find out who will be consuming the data,
and what their expectations are.
I think
At Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:09:02 +0530,
Anand Chitipothu wrote:
On 02-Jun-10, at 7:34 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
Just another quick update to let you know I emailed foaf-dev for
advice:
http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2010-June/
010253.html
To start hacking on the code
To make things a big more concrete:
http://kcoyle.net/temp/comparePersonVocabs.pdf
is my comparison between BIO, FOAF, RDA, and the OL author type. I
underlined fields that I though could be used, but don't consider this
definitive.
kc
--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Have you tried an Edition in RDF? The Work and Author ones are just stubs
that Anand created.
Here's an Edition rdf:
http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6026352M.rdf
No, I hadn't seen that yet! That is a perfect example of what
On 01-Jun-10, at 7:28 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
Kudos for keeping the linkeddata rdf views in the new version of
OpenLibrary. I just noticed that the application/rdf+xml views seem to
lack a namespace prefix definition for 'rdf'. This causes some tools
to choke when parsing the XML. Also I
e...@curry:~/Downloads$ xmllint --format
http://openlibrary.org/works/OL158398W.rdf
http://openlibrary.org/works/OL158398W.rdf:4: namespace error :
Namespace prefix rdf on RDF is not defined
This error is fixed now.
Anand___
Ol-tech mailing list
Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
There are two possible values for author: the author ID and the author
name. It seems to me that both are of interest -- the author ID would
be another entry point for getting more info, but the author name
allows immediate use/display of the work data.
Hi Ed,
Thanks - and yes, we're beginning to track RDF-related issues in our Launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openlibrary/+bugs?field.tag=rdf
This would be Super Awesome time for you to patch the source!! Can we help you
along with that?
Cheers,
george
Ed Summers wrote:
Kudos for
Oops :)
Excuse me!
Anand Chitipothu wrote:
On 01-Jun-10, at 7:28 PM, Ed Summers wrote:
Kudos for keeping the linkeddata rdf views in the new version of
OpenLibrary. I just noticed that the application/rdf+xml views seem to
lack a namespace prefix definition for 'rdf'. This causes some
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
Agreed. However, we aren't using SKOS, so I'm thinking we'll use
something like:
rdf:Description rdf:about=http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL22022A;
rdf:valueBarbara Cartland/rdf:value
/rdf:Description
Does
On 02-Jun-10, at 7:34 AM, Ed Summers wrote:
Just another quick update to let you know I emailed foaf-dev for
advice:
http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2010-June/
010253.html
To start hacking on the code I'd need to get a develop instance up and
running which I imagine
17 matches
Mail list logo
