Folks,
We are trying to implement a fileserver using OmniOS. The customer
has been on Linux until now, but ZFS seems VERY tempting.
The first problem we ran into is that OmniOS seems to limit the
number of groups per user to 16 by default. Setting ngroups_max to
128 in /etc/system seemd to take
Today Ira Cooper wrote:
Actually, just set ngroups_max to 1024 in /etc/system, there is an outside
chance of a user having 128 groups in some AD environments. 1024 seems
less likely.
so you suggest that setting ngroups_max to 128 is bad ? while
setting it to 1024 would be good ? in our setup
Today Ira Cooper wrote:
If it works, use it.
I'm merely stating from experience in situations with even more groups, the
max is 1024, and people may wish to be aware of it / use it. I personally
use it just so I don't have to worry about increasing it. But that's me.
in testing it worked,
We are in the process of deploying omnios for a large customer with
a complex group setup ... only to find that support for more than
16 groups per user was broken ... this got fixed upstream in the
mean time ...
could you please merge the fix ?
Hi Michael,
Today Michael Mounteney wrote:
Hello, as my current OmniOS server doesn't have removable disks, I've
added an external USB2 HDD as a mirror, so that in the event of fire or
holiday, the external disk can be taken away as a backup.
How does OmniOS deal with a very slow mirror ?
Just experimented for the first time with zones on my omnios box
... workes fine ... great stuff ... except that I now realize that
zoneadm -z xxx install
by default it seems to install bloody, how do I get a zone installed
with stable ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG,
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Just experimented for the first time with zones on my omnios box
... workes fine ... great stuff ... except that I now realize that
zoneadm -z xxx install
by default it seems to install
Hi Chavdar,
Yesterday Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
Any particular reason not to use the default smb/server under OmniOS? My
Solaris/OmniOS/OpenIndiana hosts all have joined our domain without many
problems:
I am aware of the differences in semantics as far as samba and Solaris
smb/server is
Hi Thomas,
Today Thomas Werschlein wrote:
Hi Tobi
On 16.09.2013, at 22:56, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I am trying to use samba/winbind to hook up our omnios box to an AD
server. After some fiddleling, I managed to compile samba +
openldap linked to the system krb5 libraries
Folks,
I have started to create packages for omnios and I am a bit at a
loss as to packaging 'standards' ...
With omnios getting more popular, I think it would be a good move
to have some standards as to where things should go on the system
...
good old
/opt/X
/etc/opt/X
/var/opt/X
come to
Hi Eric,
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Folks,
I have started to create packages for omnios and I am a bit at a
loss as to packaging 'standards' ...
With omnios getting more popular, I think it would be a good move
Folks,
I have this nfs client (ubunty 3.5 kernel) which seems to have
issues talking to our omnios server. In the example below the
client does not seem to get an answer to his ACCESS3 call from
08:19:48.43 and starts retransmitting. It does not seem as if
packets got lost ... Does this
Folks,
I am runnning omnios OmniOS 5.11 omnios-8d266aa 2013.05.04 on
a box where we server zfs storage space and also run a few kvm
hosts.
Over the last few days, omnios has intermittently become 'mute' on
its network interface. Not answering to tcp or icmp requests.
Connecting via the
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
oot@fugu:~# dladm show-link
LINKCLASS MTUSTATEBRIDGE OVER
igb0phys 1500 up -- --
igb1phys 1500 up -- --
igb2
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
the troubling bit is that during the outage, the kvm hosts on
akami0 and nigiri0 were able to talk to the physical network just
fine, but they were not able to talk to fugu0 ... and this is all
We are looking at buying a system consisting of a 1U server and 1
or more 3U JBOD boxes to run and OmniOS ZFS server. Any HW
recommendations for the JBOD box, Controller, Disks, what are you
using ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
Yesterday Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:05:11 +0100 (CET)
Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/4u/6047/ssg-6047r-e1r36l.cfm
filled with UltraStar 7k3000 and a ZeusRam 8GB as Zil
and 256 GB ram
Nice rick;-)
nice
We are looking at purchasing a new box. According to
https://github.com/joyent/manufacturing/blob/master/parts-database.ods
it seems that Joyent is using
Supermicro SuperStorage Server 6047R-E1R36L with 7K3000 (and maybe
soon 7K4000) disks.
Hi Saso,
Today Saso Kiselkov wrote:
On 11/11/13, 2:05 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
We are looking at purchasing a new box. According to
https://github.com/joyent/manufacturing/blob/master/parts-database.ods
it seems that Joyent is using
Supermicro SuperStorage Server 6047R-E1R36L
Hi Keith,
Today Keith Wesolowski wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
We are looking at purchasing a new box. According to
https://github.com/joyent/manufacturing/blob/master/parts-database.ods
it seems that Joyent is using
Supermicro SuperStorage
Following the latest instructions from your webpage, we tried this:
pkg list incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland /dev/null 21 || pkg install
incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland@11,5.11-0.151006
now, if we run
# pkg update -nv
we get
Creating Plan /
pkg update: No solution was found to
Hi Eric,
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Following the latest instructions from your webpage, we tried this:
pkg list incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland /dev/null 21 || pkg
install incorporation/jeos/omnios-userland
Hi Paul,
Today Paul Jochum wrote:
Hi Tobias:
Sorry, I don't know why you are having these strang io-patterns, but I
was wondering if you could share how you
record and display this info?
I created a little plugin for collectd to interface with iostat. I
guess having one for vfsstat
,
Henk
On 13/12/2013 14:13, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
I created a little plugin for collectd to interface with iostat. I
guess having one for vfsstat and arcstat along the same lines would
give a better picture as to what users actually experience but this
one gives some impression as to what
I am running omnios r151008 on a recent box with 3gig SAS disks
arranged in a raidz2 pool.
I have this 7TB filesystem where I have my zimbra server store its
backups. The backup-sets are highly redundant, so for a time I had
deduplication turned on to great effect, but as the size of the
Hi Richard,
Yesterday Richard Elling wrote:
On Dec 22, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Hi Richard,
Yesterday Richard Elling wrote:
c) shouldn't the smarter write throttle change
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit
I just had an odd thing happening to my r151008 server. It suddenly
stopped communicating over its igb0 interface ...
Upon further investigation I found:
a) several KVM guests talking over the same physical interface were
still happily chatting
b) logging into the guests and trying to reach
Hi,
we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on
the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours.
any idea what could be causing this ?
server and client are directly via a crossover cable over a dedicated interface.
Jan 21 01:21:34 iscsi-client kernel: :
Today Dan McDonald wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Narayan Desai narayan.de...@gmail.com wrote:
We've seen problems like this when we have a SATA drive in a SAS expander
that is going out to lunch. Are there any drives showing errors in iostat
-En? or any drive timeout messages in
Hi Tim,
Today Tim Rice wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi,
we are serving ISCSI volumes from our omnios box ... in the log on
the client I keep seeing this pattern every few hours.
any idea what could be causing this ?
server and client are directly via
Hi Nld,
Today Narayan Desai wrote:
Sorry, I should have given the requisite yes, I know that this is a recipe
for sadness, for I too have experienced said sadness.
That said, we've seen this kind of problem when there was a device in a
vdev that was dying a slow death. There wouldn't
Today Saso Kiselkov wrote:
I guess you can check for this string at runtime:
$ strings /kernel/drv/amd64/igb | grep _eee_support
If it is missing, then it could be the buggy EEE support that's throwing
your link out of whack here.
Nevermind, missed your description of the KVM guests
a zpool on one of our boxes has been degraded with several disks
faulted ...
* the disks are all sas direct attached
* according to smartctl the offending disks have no faults.
* zfs decided to fault the disks after the events below.
I have now told the pool to clear the errors and it is
Today Zach Malone wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@richardelling.com wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
a zpool on one of our boxes has been degraded with several disks
faulted ...
* the disks are all sas
Yesterday Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
[...]
it happened over time as you can see from the timestamps in the
log. The errors from zfs's point of view were 1 read and about 30 write
but according to smart the disks
Hi Richard,
Mar 23 Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Yesterday Richard Elling wrote:
On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
[...]
it happened over time as you can see from the timestamps
Today we were out of diskspace on one of our pools ... a few removed
snapshots later all is fine, except that I find that I don't realy
understand the numbers ... can anyone elighten me?
# zpool list fast
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZCAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
fast 4.34T 1.74T 2.61T
Just out:
ZnapZend a Multilevel Backuptool for ZFS
It is on Github. Check out
http://www.znapzend.org
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
www.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902
___
of OmniOS-discuss digest...
Today's Topics:
1. announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool (Tobias Oetiker)
2. Re: announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool
(Theo Schlossnagle)
3. Re: announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool (Saso Kiselkov)
4. Re: Slow scrub performance
digest...
Today's Topics:
1. announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool (Tobias Oetiker)
2. Re: announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool
(Theo Schlossnagle)
3. Re: announcement znapzend a new zfs backup tool (Saso Kiselkov)
4. Re: Slow scrub performance
\
--mbuffersize=1G --tsformat='%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S' \
SRC '7d=1h,30d=4h,90d=1d' tank/home \
DST:a '7d=1h,30d=4h,90d=1d,1y=1w,10y=1month' -O 10.0.0.1:9090
- Original Message -
From: Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch
To: Hafiz Rafibeyli rafibe...@gmail.com
Cc: omnios-discuss
--mbuffer=/opt/omni/bin/mbuffer:13872 \
--mbuffersize=1G --tsformat='%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S' \
SRC '7d=1h,30d=4h,90d=1d' tank/home \
DST:a '7d=1h,30d=4h,90d=1d,1y=1w,10y=1month' root@bserv:backup/home
cheers
tobi
- Original Message -
From: Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch
Today Hafiz Rafibeyli wrote:
Hello Tobias,
did you try znapzend on Nexenta 4.x?anyway run it on Nexenta?
no
and second question:
is znapzend working with volume based(block based) filesystems?
there should be no problem ...
cheers
tobi
regards,
Hafiz
--
Tobi Oetiker,
) but otherwhise there is no option for this
(yet).
cheers
tobi
i'm using demonize mode
Regards,
Hafiz
- Original Message -
From: Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch
To: Hafiz Rafibeyli rafibe...@gmail.com
Cc: omnios-discuss omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September, 2014 11:54
I just did a little investigation, why my additions to /etc/logadm.d
were not showing up in /etc/logadm.conf and came upon
/lib/svc/method/logadm-upgrade
Has the person who crafed this little marvel ever wonderd what
the meaning of upgrade is ? Seriously ? Maybe the script should
have been
Hi
I have been looking into network performance on omnios hosted kvm
hosts. especially in connection with ssh.
the test is this:
physical-linux-host$ ssh -c aes256-cbc virtual-kvm-linux-host dd if=/dev/zero
bs=10M count=10 /dev/null
running this simple test from a physical ubuntu 12.04
I am still running omnios r10 ...being reluctant to upgrade,
because we find that kvm virtio network performance seems to have
taken a severe hit from r10 to r12
I am runing this simple test:
hw-box$ ssh -c aes256-ctr kvm-guest dd if=/dev/zero bs=10M count=10
/dev/null
On r10 I get 31 MB/s
Hi Dan,
Today Dan McDonald wrote:
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I am still running omnios r10 ...being reluctant to upgrade,
because we find that kvm virtio network performance seems to have
taken a severe hit from r10 to r12
I am runing
Hi Michael,
Nov 9 Michael Mounteney wrote:
[Later] just running
# /usr/sbin/in.tftpd -p -d -s /tftpboot
doesn't work either. A client-side
$ tftp cortex -c get text
times out.
we found that tftpd on omnios stoped working with the upgrade to
r10 .. we have investigated a bit but not
So tonight, we finally took the plunge and upgraded our zfs/kvm
server to r151012 ... the results were terrible. The kvm booted
very slowly and all networking felt really slow ... so I did a
little test:
ubutu-14.04-guest$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=20 | ssh omnios-r151012-host
dd
Yesterday Dan McDonald wrote:
I have not tested disk performance explicitly, but even booting a
windows host took ages ... so I suspect whatever is causing this
influences all kvm guest IO.
What's really REALLY weird about this is that we did not alter
anything about how we built KVM
Hi Michael,
Today Michael Mounteney wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 06:14:56 +0100 (CET)
Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
This leads me to suspect, that either only very few people are
using omnios as a kvm server OR it is also a hardware dependent
problem.
I think it must be. I'm
I am looking at upgrading the firmware of our LSI HBAs to P19 since
we suspect that our use of P17 is the cause for disk timeouts we
are seeing every few weeks.
I am wondering, is it save to flash the HBAs from a running omnios system,
and if so, has anyone written some notes down on the process
...
ipadm only accepts the setting with the -t switch
cheers
tobi
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I seem to run into trouble with ipadm ...
here is the latest
root@simplon:~# ipadm show-addr
ADDROBJ TYPE STATEADDR
lo0/v4
Hi Dan,
Yesterday Dan McDonald wrote:
On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 2014, at 2:54 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I seem to run into trouble with ipadm ...
here is the latest
Silly question -- what does ipadm show
caveat: due to the kvm performance problem I am still running 010
... but maybe this is also a problem on more recent versions ...
so here goes:
after upgrading to 010 the tftp service on our omnios box stopped
working properly ... it served a few bytes of the request and then
timed out ...
we
Hi Michael,
so your tests wer now exectued on a bloody host ?
indicating that the performance went back up in bloody ?
cheers
tobi
Today Michael Mounteney wrote:
Sorry to take so long to get back to you Tobias and I hope this is
still relevant. As described elsewhere in this list, I had
Is
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/89621fe174cf95ae903df6ceab605bf24d696ac3
in 14 ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
www.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902
___
Dan,
you mentioned in an earlier post that you had not heard anything
good about P19 ... this seems to prompt people to consider
downgreading to P18 ...
Did you mean to say that you had heared something BAD about P19 or
just nothing at all. Because I like my firmware best when it just
does what
I got a bunch of new disks on one of our systems and wanted to
transfer an existing pool over to them so what I did was this:
zfs snapshot -r old-pool@replicaton
zfs send -R old-pool@replication | mbuffer -m 1G | zfs receive -F -d
new-pool
but then halfway through the operation, I got
/675185/incomplete-recursive-snapshots-on-zfs
cheers
tobi
Dan
Sent from my iPhone (typos, autocorrect, and all)
On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:25 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I got a bunch of new disks on one of our systems and wanted to
transfer an existing pool over to them so
I got these bunch of new disks when for our (r12 omnios) server and
userd repication send / receive to transfer an existing pool to the
new disks. While doing so, we found that the kvm instances running
on that machine had a rather pronounced tendency to become
unresponsive. Killing the kvm
If zfs sees too many errors on a disk, it will 'FAULT'
the disk, replace it with a spare disk and start resilvering.
We have one system where this keeps happening ... as explained in
http://lists.omniti.com/pipermail/omnios-discuss/2014-March/002413.html
We have since replaced the firmware on
Hi Dan,
Today Dan McDonald wrote:
Sometime during Q2CY2015 (no earlier than April 1st), OmniOS
r151014 will be released. At that time, support for r151010
(previous stable) will be discontinued. This is in accordance
with the OmniOS release cycle:
experts!
If you were to buy 6TB disks for a RAIDZ2 Pool, would you go for
512n like in the olden days, or use the new 4Kn.
I know ZFS can deal with both ...
So what would be your choice, and WHY?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
Today Tobias Oetiker wrote:
Hi Marts,
Yesterday Warren Marts wrote:
At some point sourcing true 512 B/sector disks will get more difficult and
expensive - unless you knew this filesystem is likely to see lots of small
writes and performance or space efficiency are critical I'd lean
Michael,
Today Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:25:42 +
John Barfield john.barfi...@bissinc.com wrote:
I?ll try to pull some numbers but the truth is that debian based guest
versions perform WAY better than CentOS guests.
Are the kernels identical in Debian and
I am just watching OpenZFS Conference Videos. George Wilson just
showed off his allocation throttle work ... is this in omnios
already ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
www.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902
Friday Tobias Oetiker wrote:
We are trying to get an intel 10G network interface x540 to work
on omnios r014. We do see the interface with
$ dladm show-phys
but it does not show any reaction when we plug an ethernet cable
leading to a 1Gb switch port. It stays 'down'
to resolve
We are trying to get an intel 10G network interface x540 to work
on omnios r014. We do see the interface with
$ dladm show-phys
but it does not show any reaction when we plug an ethernet cable
leading to a 1Gb switch port. It stays 'down'
any ideas ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker,
We are looking into the possibility of setting up our first SSD
based pool ... any recommendations for SSDs to use ?
Our System Integrator recommends the use of Intel SSDs as opposed
to Samsung since Samsung would be changing their lineup every few
weeks and thus make it difficult to source
Just found that samsung now has an ssd with power loss protection
http://www.storagereview.com/samsung_sm863_ssd_review
what do you think ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
www.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902
Hi Lawrence,
if you install something from source, NEVER unpack the source in
the installation directory ...
unpack in /scratch or /tmp ... install to /opt/package-version
cheers
tobi
Today Lawrence Giam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to test Znapzend on OmniOS R151014 but getting errors on
Hi Robert
znapzend is "push-only"
cheers
tobi
Today Robert Fantini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got znapzend working on omnios. that can remote send to linux using a
> napp-it job .
>
> Next I want to run znapzend on linux and pull from omnios .
>
> this does not work ,
> znapzendzetup create \
- On 18 Aug, 2016, at 17:15, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Mick Burns wrote:
>>
>> *bump*
>> anyone ?
>
> I'm going to forward your note to someone I know who works on CIFS. He's not
> on
> this list.
looking forward to the
Robert,
Today Robert.fantini wrote:
> Hello
>
> My issue may have nothing to do with the omnios upgrade. It could be due to a
> mistake I made somewhere else.
>
> After upgrading to :
> OmniOS 5.11 omnios-cac2b76 October 2016
> SunOS sys4 5.11 omnios-cac2b76 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
> our KVM's using
On 11 Jan, 2017, at 00:03, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
> Given how encompassing the 022 work is, don't hold your breath. If there are
> real, provable show-stoppers in LX, fixes may get backported.
We have setup ThinLinc (www.cendio.com) in an ubuntu 16.04 lx zone ...
ThinLinc is a
- On Mar 17, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
>> On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Tobias Oetiker <t...@oetiker.ch> wrote:
>>
>> We found the cause of the problem:
>>
>> svc:/system/rcap:default
>>
>> enable it and enjo
We found the cause of the problem:
svc:/system/rcap:default
enable it and enjoy the behaviour detailed below plus random hangs on nfs and
iscsi export
disable it and things are as before
cheers
tobi
- On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:15 PM, Dan McDonald dan...@omniti.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
maybe a page on the omnios wiki with pointers would be all that is needed
cheers
tobi
- On Apr 3, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Johan Kragsterman
johan.kragster...@capvert.se wrote:
> Hi Michael and all!
>
>
> I think this is a good idea, thanks, Michael, but that is not the most
> important
>
So, there you have it ... software is not free, and for something as complex
and slick as OmniOS, there is serious money involved in keeping it at its
current level.
It seems that OmniTI has not managed to get this message
across to the many organizations relying on OmniOS to run their
Servers.
Hi
We are running kvm instances on omni r20 and are experiencing random short
freezes.
I wrote the following short test script to see how frequent the freezing
occurres
perl -e 'use Time::HiRes qw(time usleep); my $now = time; while(1){usleep
20; my $next = time; my $diff = $next -
Did zfs-io-priority for zones ever make it into omnios ?
https://omnios.omniti.com/ticket.php/13 suggests it did
but the notes on configuring it from
https://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/Tuning+the+IO+Throttle
don't seem to apply.
anyone ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker,
t 5:32 AM, Tobias Oetiker <t...@oetiker.ch> wrote:
> >
> > Did zfs-io-priority for zones ever make it into omnios ?
> >
> > https://omnios.omniti.com/ticket.php/13 suggests it did
> >
> > but the notes on configuring it from
> >
> > https://wi
OmniOS Community Edition is releasing OmniOS r151022m three days early as this
is an urgent security release. The release contains new versions of git and hg
to fix
CVE-2017-1000117
CVE-2017-1000116
CVE-2017-1000115
see http://blog.recurity-labs.com/2017-08-10/scm-vulns for details
on the
the hope that "the
community" would take up further development of the OS. 14 weeks later, OmniOS
Community Edition is a reality.
Andy Fiddaman (www.citrus-it.net), Tobias Oetiker (www.oetiker.ch) and Dominik
Hassler have spent some quality time setting up the systems and procedures
a
OmniOSce Bloody
With the urgent security updates and bug fixes for r151022 out of the way we
have spent the last week concentrating on getting bloody updated, including new
ISO, USB and PXE images. In addition to bringing us up-to-date with the latest
from illumos, we have also bumped many of
Hi Chris,
we have discussed this in the core team and found that no one of us has been
using LTS until now and no one is planning to do so in the future ...
What we intend, is to support the current and previous release with an emphasis
on the current release going forward from r151022.
That
- On Jul 2, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Andy Fiddaman omn...@citrus-it.net wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Guenther Alka wrote:
>
> ; Unless there are news regarding OmniOS my stance is
> ;
> ; - OmniOS 151022 is a freeze of current Illumos + LX. At the moment it is the
> ; most stable and feature rich
Gea,
the king is dead, long live the king
https://gitter.im/omniosorg/Lobby
www.omniosce.org
the story continues ...
cheers
tobi
- On Jul 5, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Guenther Alka wrote:
> about OmniOS and the silence for weeks
> For my own future, I have already
Hi Aurélien,
- On Jul 7, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Aurélien Larcher <aurelien.larc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Tobias Oetiker < [ mailto:t...@oetiker.ch |
> t...@oetiker.ch ] > wrote:
>> Hi Aurélien
>> the motivation behind OmniOSc
Folks,
so if you would rather have someone maintain omnios fulltime than relying on
'the community' todo it for free, now is the time to come forward. Write down
a line in our straw poll spreadsheet ...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IyAI950a-JkPgRRLSezZm9-Rt8HkfO_nIkubd_m8d_0
then we
Dear All
This is the weekly update for w/c 7th of August 2017 and contains NO security
updates but several bugfixes from upstream illumos and joyent lx. For this
update, a reboot is required.
We are aware that system reboots pose a problem for many sites, so we are
investigating ways to
- On May 15, 2017, at 11:20 PM, Michael Rasmussen m...@miras.org wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2017 22:46:10 +0200
> Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 May 2017 07:37:35 +0200
>> Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>>
>> > To follow example I will commit myself to
since omnios is already taken how about
https://github.com/omniosorg
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
www.oetiker.ch t...@oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902
___
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
Oliver,
are you running rcapd ? we found that (at least of the box) this thing wrecks
havoc to both
nfs and iscsi sharing ...
cheers
tobi
- On Jun 22, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Oliver Weinmann
wrote:
> Hi,
> we are using OmniOS for a few months now and
Release Notes for OmniOSce 151022s
--
Early weekly release for w/c 25th of September 2017, uname -a shows
omnios-r151022-eb9d5cb557
Since this release contains security fixes we urge people to upgrade as soon as
possible.
** This update requires a reboot. **
In response to our call for someone to step up to take over responsibility to
maintain OmniOS LTS releases we received a number of detailed responses, but
only from people interested in using the product and none who wanted to help
maintain it.
After careful consideration of all the input,
OmniOS Community Edition is releasing OmniOS r151022o with a bunch of security
fixes:
libxml2 fixes for:
* CVE-2016-4658
* CVE-2016-5131
* CVE-2017-0663
* CVE-2017-5969
* CVE-2017-9047
* CVE-2017-9048
* CVE-2017-9049
* CVE-2017-9050
bzip2 fix for (we
with
>> a
>> (pro forma) invoice online what makes institutional/edu payments
>> possible
>> (to accept this quotation, pay the amount until..)
>>
>> - with some sort of an extra offer over the free offerings
>> maybe a Pro subscription to beta/
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo