Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Library Communications Framework

2012-11-19 Thread Dan Scott
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:13:01AM -0800, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote: I have just returned from the UK where I met with BIC and CILIP (Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals) representatives as well as RFID vendors. BIC has commissioned of a new set of library

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Library Communications Framework

2012-11-19 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
I think instead of inviting BIC to use Evergreen, it would be more fruitful for we, US Libraries, build on the work they've done to look beyond those many protocols (from among the yet another you mention) that a) are implemented completely differently across systems) and b) are limited in the

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Library Communications Framework

2012-11-19 Thread Dan Scott
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:12:29PM -0800, Lori Bowen Ayre wrote: I think instead of inviting BIC to use Evergreen, it would be more fruitful for we, US Libraries, build on the work they've done to look beyond those many protocols (from among the yet another you mention) that a) are implemented

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Library Communications Framework

2012-11-19 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
Dan, Thanks for the clarification. But, isn't suggesting BIC develop modules for Evergreen like asking NISO to write the SIP3 interface for Evergreen? Maybe that is how something like this is done but I do know that there has already been one implementation of the LCF (the work was done by