Marc Dionne wrote:
John W. Sopko Jr. wrote:
Without more information I would
only be speculating on how Microsoft intends one to use the setspn
command. Having multiple service principles attached to a single account
name is confusing.
Nothing to do with AFS, but setspn is useful even in a
Hi!
All the documentation I've encountered insists that the directory owner
has implicit a permission to the directory. I know this no longer
applies (as of 1.4.something, where something = 2, since 2 is what we
use). While this probably should be reflected in the documentations, it
makes me
Juha Jäykkä wrote:
Hi!
as a member of system:adminstrators, do
mkdir /afs/cell/dir
mkdir /afs/cell/dir/dir2
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir user all
as user, do
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir/dir2 anyone anything
to get
fs: You don't have the required access rights on ...
This is the expected
as a member of system:adminstrators, do
mkdir /afs/cell/dir
mkdir /afs/cell/dir/dir2
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir user all
as user, do
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir/dir2 anyone anything
to get
fs: You don't have the required access rights on ...
This is the expected behaviour,
Juha Jäykkä schrieb:
as a member of system:adminstrators, do
mkdir /afs/cell/dir
mkdir /afs/cell/dir/dir2
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir user all
as user, do
fs setacl /afs/cell/dir/dir2 anyone anything
to get
fs: You don't have the required access rights on ...
This is the expected behaviour,
Juha Jäykkä [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps the way to go is groups, although this situation would dictate
groups with only a single member, but at least memberships can be given
and taken easily without admin interference. All other situations,
groups are easier anyway since there are
Has anyone else seen this behavior:
bash-2.05$ pts mem kim:foobar
Members of kim:foobar (id: -152687) are:
bash-2.05$ pts rename kim:foobar kim:boofar
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
bash-2.05$
bash-2.05$ pts chown kim:foobar kkadmin
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
bash-2.05$
Kim
Yes, I submitted a patch for this a while back, it's in the CVS head -
look for changes to src/ptserver/ptuser.c.
Kevin Hildebrand
University of Maryland, College Park
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Kim Kimball wrote:
Has anyone else seen this behavior:
bash-2.05$ pts mem kim:foobar
Members of
* pts chown and rename crashes have been fixed.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-announce/2007/000180.html
Kim Kimball wrote:
Has anyone else seen this behavior:
bash-2.05$ pts mem kim:foobar
Members of kim:foobar (id: -152687) are:
bash-2.05$ pts rename kim:foobar kim:boofar
An afterthought...
This truly does concern me.
How does a production/stable release make it out with pts
commands coredumping?
Is there a testing framework in place? Maybe it just doesn't
go this deep? :(
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
Hi all,
I would like to use GSSAPIAuthentication with ssh-krb5 package
on debian.
The ssh server does the work, but, my problem is that I cannot get
neither the kerberos tgt neither the afs token when I login:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ klist
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1112_19O8Ft
Default
we got a note from symantec as well...we use afs and netbackup for
general backups here (the northstar afs cell is just a small part of
the stuff that gets backed up) and we have our homegrown scripts to
get the data ready for netbackup. if we hear anything interesting from
symantec,
Oh one more thing to add, we are going to turn the current 16 drive
raid into two replicated 8 drive raids using DRBD to replicate between
the new fileserver' and a live spare. Not sure if that will make a
difference. I am thinking that part should work fine regardless of
which of the 3
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
Brandon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now what I am trying to figure out, is should I use openafs or gfs to
replace NFS? GFS was sounding cool as I read that using iscsi to
connect the partition on the raid at a block level could be 10 times
faster than NFS. But
Jeff Blaine wrote:
An afterthought...
This truly does concern me.
How does a production/stable release make it out with pts
commands coredumping?
Is there a testing framework in place? Maybe it just doesn't
go this deep? :(
We do not have a test framework that can test every command.
On 18 Jan 2007, at 21:29, Massimiliano Masi wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to use GSSAPIAuthentication with ssh-krb5 package
on debian.
Firstly, you need to have credential delegation enabled. You need
GSSAPIDelegateCredentials yes in the client configuration file, or
the client command
Massimiliano Masi wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to use GSSAPIAuthentication with ssh-krb5 package
on debian.
You need too delegate as well. So the client
needs GSSAPIDelegateCredentials yes
The ssh server does the work, but, my problem is that I cannot get
neither the kerberos tgt
17 matches
Mail list logo
