[OpenAFS] repeated message: Delete longest inactive host

2006-11-05 Thread Michal Svamberg
Hello, AFS Fileserver (OpenAFS 1.4.1 built 2006-05-05) was coming to meltdown slowly. After debuging (kill -TSTP) to the fileserver on level 1, it writes a log message: ---cut--- Fri Nov 3 08:26:50 2006 [16] GSS: First looking for timed out call backs via CleanupCallBacks Fri Nov 3 08:26:50

Re: [OpenAFS] many packet are as rx_ignoreAckedPacket and meltdown

2006-11-05 Thread Michal Svamberg
Hi, Thank for the link. The problem is that the clients have the same UUID because they have the same SID. This problem is seen at hosts.dump (kill -XCPU pid_of_fileserver) near the line with string lock:, for example: ---cut--- ip:360de493 port:7001 hidx:251 cbid:16297 lock:

Re: [OpenAFS] many packet are as rx_ignoreAckedPacket and meltdown

2006-11-05 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Michal Svamberg wrote: Hi, Thank for the link. The problem is that the clients have the same UUID because they have the same SID. This problem is seen at hosts.dump Ugh. I have a question about this problem, do you consider about new option with maximum clients with the

RE: [OpenAFS] 1.5.10 notes - i386_w2k

2006-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, ted creedon wrote: The 1.5.10 downloaded msi file is named openafs-en-US-1-5-11.msi. I can send it to you directly if required. Maybe if you renamed it. It's not that way on the server: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] 6 ls /afs/grand.central.org/software/openafs/1.5.10/win2k/*.msi

Re: [OpenAFS] many packet are as rx_ignoreAckedPacket and meltdown

2006-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Michal Svamberg wrote: Hi, Thank for the link. The problem is that the clients have the same UUID because they have the same SID. Are you saying that these are Windows machines and that (a) you cloned the machines and did not delete the AFSCache or (b) are running cloned machines with OAFW

Re: [OpenAFS] many packet are as rx_ignoreAckedPacket and meltdown

2006-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Hutzelman
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Michal Svamberg wrote: Thank for the link. The problem is that the clients have the same UUID Don't do this. UUID stands for Universally Unique IDentifier; each client _MUST_ have a different UUID. If two or more clients have the same UUID, then the fileserver thinks that

Re: [OpenAFS] many packet are as rx_ignoreAckedPacket and meltdown

2006-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Michal Svamberg wrote: I have a question about this problem, do you consider about new option with maximum clients with the same UUID that can connected to fileserver? Or write warning message to FileLog (without debug)? By my opinion it is not good if clients are able to shutdown a server.

Re: [OpenAFS] Server connection speed differences

2006-11-05 Thread Derrick J Brashear
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Mr Budzynowski wrote: How and when does the cache manager assign ranks to file servers? Based on classful subnetting (regardless of whether you use it) when it encounters them. Specifically, does it take the connection speed into account? No. For instance, if an