[oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010j.bb | 10 -- recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010k.bb | 10 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010j.bb create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 1/2] tzcode-native: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
--- recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb | 16 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010k.bb | 16 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb create mode 100644 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010k.bb

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] tzcode-native: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Roman I Khimov
В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 10:01:31 автор Simon Busch написал: --- recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb | 16 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010k.bb | 16 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100644

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] tzcode-native: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread morphis
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:10:42 +0400, Roman I Khimov ro...@khimov.ru wrote: В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 10:01:31 автор Simon Busch написал: --- recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb | 16 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010k.bb | 16 2 files

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/8/10 Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com: On 10 August 2010 04:31, Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/8/9 Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Hauser, Wolfgang (external) wolfgang.hauser.exter...@eads.com wrote:

[oe] [PATCH] package_ipk.bbclass: remove redundant dependencies upon opkg/opkg-collateral.

2010-08-10 Thread Graham Gower
Signed-off-by: Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com --- classes/package_ipk.bbclass |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/classes/package_ipk.bbclass b/classes/package_ipk.bbclass index 3d70181..5d388da 100644 --- a/classes/package_ipk.bbclass +++

[oe] [PATCH] task-boot.bb: Don't pull in u-a if ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT=none.

2010-08-10 Thread Graham Gower
This makes it possible to build an opkgless system, without having to set DISTRO_UPDATE_ALTERNATIVES. In the unlikely event that someone doesn't want opkg, but does want update-alternatives, one can set DISTRO_UPDATE_ALTERNATIVES in the local.conf. Signed-off-by: Graham Gower

[oe] SDK problems. GCC won't launch because it can't find libmpfr.so.4

2010-08-10 Thread Tasslehoff Kjappfot
I've compiled an SDK from a source tree in //data/src/lead-dev/openembedded/, and the resulting gcc compiler for arm has an RPATH of //data/src/lead-dev/openembedded/build/angstrom-dev/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/lib/, and will only run on my machine as long as that directory exists. If I remove

Re: [oe] [PATCH] ncurses: added 5.7 recipe

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Enrico Scholz enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote: It uses ideas from the old 5.4 recipe but brings a lot of new features like widec libs, pkgconfig files or splitted library packages.

Re: [oe] [PATCH] openmoko: removed distro

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As discussed on #oe on aug 10, 2010. Removed because this is not used or maintained any more. A message * * *Sorry, The Openmoko distribution has been removed on aug 10, 2010. *It is recommended to use the SHR

Re: [oe] SDK problems. GCC won't launch because it can't find libmpfr.so.4

2010-08-10 Thread Tasslehoff Kjappfot
This is apparently because it wants a native version of libmpfr.so.4, which is not available for Ubuntu 10.04. OE compiled a version of the library in the TMPDIR where I created the SDK, but of course that is not distributed with the SDK. I tried grabbing libmpfr.so.4 from Ubuntu 10.10, but

Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Can't build gstreamer-ti

2010-08-10 Thread Gary Thomas
On 08/09/2010 04:37 PM, Chethan Pandarinath wrote: This seems to be the same error: http://e2e.ti.com/support/dsp/omap_applications_processors/f/42/t/42905.aspx With the problem being that the cl6x compiler isn't bundled with the rest of the toolchain, and has to be downloaded separately.

Re: [oe] [PATCH] angstrom-uboot-scripts: debugged beagleboard validation boot/user scripts

2010-08-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 13:52 -0500 schrieb Jason Kridner: Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner jkrid...@beagleboard.org […] I know this has already been committed in 9eab7a12e4a94efbb53e5e43beeb67d15ae9eab5 [1]. But I do not like the commit summary. Is this script developed in a repository

Re: [oe] [PATCH] beagleboard-test-scripts: updated to latest

2010-08-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 18:58 -0500 schrieb Jason Kridner: It would be great, if you could add a link to the updated revision [1] into the commit message. [1] http://gitorious.org/beagleboard-validation/scripts/commit/f009c731df5c410eb819fa90f199713ea60cea6a Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner

Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Can't build gstreamer-ti

2010-08-10 Thread Gary Thomas
On 08/10/2010 04:58 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: On 08/09/2010 04:37 PM, Chethan Pandarinath wrote: This seems to be the same error: http://e2e.ti.com/support/dsp/omap_applications_processors/f/42/t/42905.aspx With the problem being that the cl6x compiler isn't bundled with the rest of the

Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Can't build gstreamer-ti

2010-08-10 Thread Henning Heinold
Hi, this is known use binutils 2.18 for now. Bye Henning ___ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cross.bbclass: Override STAGING_* paths to match cross installation

2010-08-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 08:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote: Hi Khem, On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 23:44 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- classes/cross.bbclass |8 1 files

[oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010j.bb | 10 -- recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010k.bb | 10 ++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes/tzdata/tzdata_2010j.bb create mode 100644

[oe] [PATCH 2/2] linux-palmpre: bump git revision

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
The new version fixes a compile problem with software using the kernel typedefs u8 and __u8 Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/linux/linux-palmpre_git.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/linux/linux-palmpre_git.bb

[oe] [PATCH 1/2] linux-palmpre: add git version

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
The sources from Palm for the Palm Pre has beed modified with little improvements and are rebased against the latest version from Palm found at http://opensource.palm.com from time to time. The modified kernel tree is maintained by the FSO team. Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de ---

[oe] [PATCH 5/5] lvm2.inc: remove unnecessary EXTRA_OECONF_arm line from recipe

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/lvm2/lvm2.inc |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes/lvm2/lvm2.inc b/recipes/lvm2/lvm2.inc index db3a1c1..da7cc9c 100644 --- a/recipes/lvm2/lvm2.inc +++ b/recipes/lvm2/lvm2.inc @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/4] lvm2: rebase all recipes on a global lvm2.inc recipe

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Am 28.07.2010 20:07, schrieb Stefan Schmidt: Hello. On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:20, Simon Busch wrote: On 28.07.2010 15:44, Stefan Schmidt wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 21:58, Simon Busch wrote: On 26.07.2010 09:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:44, Simon Busch

Re: [oe] [PATCH] conf/distro/include: remove unused versions

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com --- While browsing through conf/distro/include I notided some files that were not used. Triggered by this I did a grep in conf/distro and conf/distro/include to

[oe] [RFC] add maintainers to distro conf files, move or remove orphaned distro's, remove obsolete distro's

2010-08-10 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Dear all, For me it is totally unclear about most of the distro's whether they are still used, and if so, who maintains them (and who to contact when there are issues) As distro's are first class citizens it seems like a good plan to identify in the conf file who is the maintainer (yes, I know

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Roman I Khimov
В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 19:27:57 автор Simon Busch написал: Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de Uhm. I meant, the _first_ one, which is for tzcode-native. BTW, it would be nice if you've updated patchwork when submitting updated patches:

Re: [oe] [PATCH] conf/distro/include: remove unused versions

2010-08-10 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2010/8/10 Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com --- While browsing through conf/distro/include I notided some files that were not used. Triggered by this I did a

Re: [oe] [PATCH] cross.bbclass: Override STAGING_* paths to match cross installation

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 08:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Richard Purdie rpur...@rpsys.net wrote: Hi Khem, On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 23:44 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Re: [oe] gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r14.1 failed on SH4 angstrom

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: HI,        I'm currently trying to use OE for a titan (SH4) board with Angstrom distrib        I've attached my conf and log        gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r14.1 failled to compile due to the

Re: [oe] glibc-initial do_install failure

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Adrian Alonso aalons...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Khem, Log with -v option at http://pastebin.com/5mB7CvHm OK it seems its using right assembler then I wonder why linker can not understand the objects generated by it. Try to generate a .o with this gcc for a small

Re: [oe] [OE][PATCH] pkgconfig.bbclass: Remove spurious rpaths and -isystem includes from pkgconfig files.

2010-08-10 Thread Ash Charles
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Roman I Khimov ro...@khimov.ru wrote: I have -isystem... change in my own patch queue and rpath-link should be fine also. I'm not so sure about incdir or libdir change though. Okay---cool. The libdir incdir stuff would be for such a case: To compile against

[oe] [PATCH 1/2] tzcode-native: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb | 16 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010k.bb | 16 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2010j.bb create mode

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Am 10.08.2010 19:53, schrieb Roman I Khimov: В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 19:27:57 автор Simon Busch написал: Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de Uhm. I meant, the _first_ one, which is for tzcode-native. BTW, it would be nice if you've updated patchwork when submitting

Re: [oe] [RFC] add maintainers to distro conf files, move or remove orphaned distro's, remove obsolete distro's

2010-08-10 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 10 sierpnia 2010 o 19:41:27 Frans Meulenbroeks napisał(a): celinux-test.conf Not listed in MAINTAINERS created by Marcin Juszkiewicz in 2006 Created for CELF and their testlab. No idea is it in use or not. Probably Tim Bird would be a good contact. IIRC it was Angstrom

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Roman I Khimov
В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 22:51:17 автор Simon Busch написал: Sorry for this. I choose the file to send too quickly so I dismissed to choose the first one :) I have updated the status of the patches in the patchwork system (never worked with it before, so I decided to reject the

Re: [oe] [Angstrom-devel] Can't build gstreamer-ti

2010-08-10 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:48:55AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 08/10/2010 04:58 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: But I've downloaded those tools and was able to build this recipe just a few weeks ago. I think something in the staged packaging has broken it. I worked past this problem by installing a

[oe] [PATCH] ecore: remove fix-ecore-fb-initialization.patch

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Removing the fix-ecore-fb-initialization patch as it let ecore open the supplied touchscreen device twice which results in an error on platforms where the touchscreen device node can be opened only once. Furthermore I doubt that it is necessary to open the touchscreen device node more than one

[oe] [PATCH] tslib: add config files for palmpre machine

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
Signed-off-by: Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de --- recipes/tslib/tslib/palmpre/ts.conf | 27 +++ recipes/tslib/tslib/palmpre/tslib.sh |6 ++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes/tslib/tslib/palmpre/ts.conf create mode

Re: [oe] [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: bump version to 2010k

2010-08-10 Thread Simon Busch
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:20:18PM +0400, Roman I Khimov wrote: В сообщении от Вторник 10 августа 2010 22:51:17 автор Simon Busch написал: Sorry for this. I choose the file to send too quickly so I dismissed to choose the first one :) I have updated the status of the patches in the

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-08-10 01:15, Graham Gower wrote: On 10 August 2010 04:31, Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/8/9 Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Hauser, Wolfgang (external)

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Chris Larson
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-08-10 01:15, Graham Gower wrote: On 10 August 2010 04:31, Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/8/9 Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com: On

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Graham Gower
On 11 August 2010 06:26, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: What's the point of setting a preferred version at all if you make it a weak assignment? The distro nearly always knows better and if you want to use a

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Mass convert PREFERRED_VERSION_* to be weakly assigned.

2010-08-10 Thread Graham Gower
On 11 August 2010 09:56, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote: On 08/10/2010 04:47 PM, Graham Gower wrote: find conf -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/^PREFERRED_VERSION_\([^ \t]*\)\([ \t]*\)=/PREFERRED_VERSION_\1\2?=/' {} \; Shouldn't DISTRO's decide on a per DISTRO decision whether or not

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Mass convert PREFERRED_VERSION_* to be weakly assigned.

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 August 2010 09:56, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote: On 08/10/2010 04:47 PM, Graham Gower wrote: find conf -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/^PREFERRED_VERSION_\([^ \t]*\)\([ \t]*\)=/PREFERRED_VERSION_\1\2?=/'

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:14:41AM +0930, Graham Gower wrote: On 11 August 2010 06:26, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: What's the point of setting a preferred version at all if you make it a weak assignment?

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Mass convert PREFERRED_VERSION_* to be weakly assigned.

2010-08-10 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:17:47AM +0930, Graham Gower wrote: find conf -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/^PREFERRED_VERSION_\([^ \t]*\)\([ \t]*\)=/PREFERRED_VERSION_\1\2?=/' {} \; Signed-off-by: Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com NACK! Not acceptable! In general - distro maintainers should

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Graham Gower
On 11 August 2010 11:12, Denys Dmytriyenko de...@denix.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:14:41AM +0930, Graham Gower wrote: On 11 August 2010 06:26, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: What's the point of

Re: [oe] gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r14.1 failed on SH4 angstrom

2010-08-10 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:27 Tue 10 Aug , Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: HI,        I'm currently trying to use OE for a titan (SH4) board with Angstrom distrib        I've attached my conf and log        

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Denys Dmytriyenko
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:13:08PM +0930, Graham Gower wrote: Ok, I'm not so passionate about this change... But I'd like to highlight why this is not particularly intuitive. My experience has been that only certain image targets will build without overrides in a local.conf. But then i

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Mike Westerhof
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: 2010/8/10 Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com: On 10 August 2010 04:31, Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/8/9 Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Hauser, Wolfgang (external) wolfgang.hauser.exter...@eads.com

Re: [oe] [PATCH] Mass convert PREFERRED_VERSION_* to be weakly assigned.

2010-08-10 Thread Mike Westerhof
Graham Gower wrote: find conf -type f -exec sed -i -e 's/^PREFERRED_VERSION_\([^ \t]*\)\([ \t]*\)=/PREFERRED_VERSION_\1\2?=/' {} \; Signed-off-by: Graham Gower graham.go...@gmail.com --- conf/distro/amsdelta-oe.conf |2 +- conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf

Re: [oe] gcc-cross-initial-4.3.3-r14.1 failed on SH4 angstrom

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: On 11:27 Tue 10 Aug     , Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote: HI,        I'm currently trying to use OE for a titan

Re: [oe] Why PREFERRED_VERSION setting of distro.conf overrules local.conf setting ?

2010-08-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-08-10 01:15, Graham Gower wrote: On 10 August 2010 04:31, Frans Meulenbroeks